Breaking!!! US Govt Found to Have Infected Blacks with STDs

This article was written 5 months ago.

AND

Clinton apologized for it in 1997.


Is this news? And is it really "breaking"?

Not really. But I see it does explain, in part, that the Black community doesn't see it as crazy that the gov't could infect Blacks with Aids, for example, as some recent preachers have claimed.

Cycloptichorn

No ****, Sherlock.

Ok..................so the title of the thread "Breaking!!! US Govt Found to Have Infected Blacks with STDs" is inaccurate right?

Tongue in cheek, Einstein. Anyone with the IQ of a flea could figure that out.

Don't take it personal, Ma.

No one at here A2K is quite as brilliant or compassionate as our dear Rozzz.

('cept maybe Ol' One Eye)

I fully support you saying whatever you like to say in order to make yourself feel good; it's immaterial either way.

Cycloptichorn

Why thank you, Cyclo.

You are one of the most courteous insulters on the forum.

Well, does this explain why at least 90% of black females today, have babies out of wedlock?

No problem. And I really didn't mean it as an insult at all. The internet, and the anonymous nature of posting, allows for everyone to present themselves to a much exaggerated degree, without fear of any real reprisal. This tends to lead to people saying things which are far more harsh or extreme then they would in real life. Therefore, the only wise course of action is to not take anyone's comments about one's personal life or character with any real seriousness; it's a good way to end up bitter and angry all the time, and a poor way to further conversation.

Cycloptichorn

Rev. Wright has made strong accusations. Those accusations are not are based gut instincts. It would be sweet to see a network interview him fairly and objectively. I doubt that will happen because Wright would have a mountain of evidence to back up his every claim. The AIDS claims certainly rankle a lot of Americans. But those claims would not have any legs at all if there wasn't something concrete to back them up. If the DOD had not asked for and received from Congess appropriations to develop a biological weapon that would attack and destroy the human immune system there would be no basis for the charges. But the DOD did make the request and there are researchers who followed that money trail and concluded the government did develop such a weapon.

"In 1969 Department of Defense representatives appeared before the Defense Subcommittee of the House and requested $10 million in 1970 DOD Appropriations for design and manufacture of a synthetic AIDS virus.

Specifically, on Tuesday, July 1, 1969, Dr. MacArthur of the Army Advanced Research Project Agency made the following statement to the Subcommittee:

"There are two things about the biological field agent I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technical surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of five to ten years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired."

MacArthur later submitted more detail to the Congressional Committee. The key points were:

1. Up to this point, (1969) all biological agents are naturally occurring.

2. It is possible to make a "new infective micro-organism" that would be "refractory to the immulogical and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious diseases."

3. A research program would take six years and $10 million.

4. The program should be initiated through the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council (NAS-NRC).

5. The matter was discussed with NAS-NRC and "tentative plans were made to initiate the program.

The report added: "It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to another method of 'massive killing of large populations." http://www.eaec.org/dove/bio-warfare.htm

Oh at least. I guess you have now officially abandoned your ridiculous ruse that you support Clinton for president.