24
   

Lola at the Coffee House, Cafe 101

 
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Apr, 2009 02:17 pm
@Lightwizard,

That photo f****d up my computer, dang it. Get with the program.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Apr, 2009 02:27 pm
@Lightwizard,
I didn't know about the Korean Center (slurps late afternoon latte, such a tacky thing to do, apparently)
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Apr, 2009 01:00 pm
@McTag,
Damn, I'm sorry, I didn't realize that there are some people on A2K who still have the wind-up version of a PC. Smile
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Apr, 2009 01:02 pm
@CalamityJane,
That looks like a building everyone will cheer and applaud when they push the plunger on the dynamite.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Apr, 2009 02:54 pm
Yes, that certainly was an architectural mishap. Prices in that building are
extremely high though. Their monthly maintenance fee is already $1000 - 1500.
It's mainly occupied by second-home-owners and retirees.

ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Apr, 2009 03:04 pm
@CalamityJane,
Well, you know what I think, so I won't elaborate.

On the cove photo I linked, and that I whined about, I think those buildings were later built a bit south around the curve from where I lived and south from where the monstrosity still reposes. More toward what we called Shell Beach or south of that.

A side point, my landlord in the victorian used to commute from there to hollywood each day, and he was an old guy then. Well, hell, I was 22-23, so he might only have been sixty. Heh.
Hmmm, maybe I can find something about them in the local news archives.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Apr, 2009 03:16 pm
@ossobuco,
I suppose I should rattle on about this - to wit -

I'm keen on ocean access, and ocean views, somewhat follow the pros and cons, at least re california, even though one of my friends has a malibu colony place, and a cousin had to change their building plans.

On the other hand, I don't always hate tall buildings in a city near water, take Chicago... but then Chicago did consider public access to some degree.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Apr, 2009 04:47 pm
@ossobuco,
Ive lost interest in the project,but does anyone know what the final design for the World Trade center II will be?

I saw the POS "compromise dsign" and found it unremarkeable and uncreative. Were any changes (think: "for the better") made in ensuing drafts.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Apr, 2009 04:51 pm
@farmerman,
I followed that incessantly in the beginning, most agreeing with Maya Lin's take on it, but never mind. I gave up, it seems like, a few years ago, big messola.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Apr, 2009 06:13 pm
@farmerman,
Here is the final design. The building also will be renamed from "Freedom Tower" to "One World Trade Center" and should be completed in 2011 -
10 years after 9/11.

http://www.gerrymay.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/freedom-tower-11.jpg
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Apr, 2009 11:40 am
@CalamityJane,
Well, if one enjoys living in a glassed-in rabbit hutch or bee hive with or without an ocean view. Promontory Point in NPB, not that modern by any means and based on Spanish architecture:

http://www.rental-living.com/assets/images/collection/signature/PromontoryPoint/gallery/lg/633500781339951141.jpg
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Apr, 2009 05:04 pm
@Lightwizard,
What a horrible, tasteless architectural feat that is.

It is meant to be funny isn't it. Say it is meant to be funny. Please.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Apr, 2009 05:12 pm
@CalamityJane,
I likd the original design that had a complex of buildings that seemed to all point to the tower , and the tower had a neat twist to it. This one is just ok but it doesnt nock yer socks off. Oh well the original WTC was kind of an ugly redux of 1950's project buildings
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Apr, 2009 01:24 pm
@farmerman,
I was dismayed when they rejected the original design but not at all astonished -- it's the Port Authority and some major leasers that I thought were the committee to approve the design but I'd have to look it up again.

It's a glass-house-boys throwback (need we know what firm got the contract just by looking at it?) With all the imaginative and innovative skyscrapers being build by other countries, notably Asian countries, we get the bland conservative glass monstrosity only appreciated by the Wingnut businessmen who want to lease space.
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Apr, 2009 02:12 pm
@CalamityJane,
Latest estimate of completion date for that tower is end-2013.

I'm often on the 42nd floor of 7, WTC (a new building) and looking down on that gaping hole is enough to make me doubt even that latest estimate for all 108 floors planned for 1, WTC. But I'm glad for the name switch - it's like "freedom fries", people have gone back to calling them French - imposed by the rental agents, who said (correctly, imho) that nobody wants to live in a mausoleum, and 1, WTC, is more commercially acceptable.
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Apr, 2009 09:57 am
@High Seas,
If everyone has seen now enough buildings, hope it's OK to bring into Lola's Coffee House some furniture - basics, like a table or a bed. This is my current favorite (serves as either piece) though people here with piercings shouldn't roll under it - it floats by magnetism:
http://bedzine.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/21082006141343-0.gif
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Apr, 2009 11:35 am
@High Seas,
You're right, "Freedom Building" would have been silly. Frankly, having been
to the old WTC and having seen Ground Zero, I am all in favor for a memorial
park and forego another WTC altogether.

How about this view?

http://tempo5.sandicor.com/SNDImages/62/090008894_501_81.jpg
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Apr, 2009 11:41 am
@High Seas,
Looks like the monolith from "2001." I'd stay away from that furniture -- you could get sucked into another galaxy, grow old and get reborn as a Star Baby.
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Apr, 2009 11:42 am
@CalamityJane,
Is that Cardiff-By-The-Sea or Carlsbad?
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Apr, 2009 11:56 am
@Lightwizard,
It does look like 2001's monolith - that's where the idea came from:
Quote:
Jan Jaap Ruijssenaars took inspiration for the bed " a sleek black platform, which took six years to develop and can double as a dining table or a plinth " from the mysterious monolith in Stanley Kubrick’s 1968 cult film “2001: A Space Odyssey.”

http://bedzine.com/blog/bed-frame/magnetic-floating-bed/
 

Related Topics

What is the most valuable thing you own? - Discussion by BumbleBeeBoogie
Has there been a roll call? - Discussion by gustavratzenhofer
Here's another Trump thread... - Discussion by tsarstepan
Should I be offended? - Question by the prince
How desperate can a christian get? - Discussion by reasoning logic
Is A2K A Religion? - Question by mark noble
Top o' the Mornin' to Ya! - Question by Transcend
8/31/05 : Gas Prices - Discussion by Ken cv
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 11:20:57