0
   

Ask yourself this question.

 
 
OGIONIK
 
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 01:55 pm
If we as individual citizens are to remain allegiant to the abstraction known as the United States of America, do we have to alter our innate sense of morality where it seems at variance with the morality of the state? Or, in a weaker version, to what extent do we have to alter our innate sense of morality in order to bring it into line with the morality of the state?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 597 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 02:23 pm
Re: Ask yourself this question.
OGIONIK wrote:
If we as individual citizens are to remain allegiant to the abstraction known as the United States of America, do we have to alter our innate sense of morality where it seems at variance with the morality of the state? Or, in a weaker version, to what extent do we have to alter our innate sense of morality in order to bring it into line with the morality of the state?
Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 03:08 pm
The state has no moral compass. The only time morality comes into it is when a politician runs for office. Once they are elected hold on to your a-s. After the next election you will see fully what I am talking about no matter who is elected. I've been around long enough to see this election after election. I almost feel sorry for you Obama supporters when you find he has feet of clay. He is going to talk to business, governments, and other entitetis, so he thinks, but they will eat him alive. Bush had a government of people who had experience although they used it to make themselves rich. Who can Obama go to for experience? Only more crooked politicians.
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 06:06 pm
Re: Ask yourself this question.
OGIONIK wrote:
If we as individual citizens are to remain allegiant to the abstraction known as the United States of America, do we have to alter our innate sense of morality where it seems at variance with the morality of the state? Or, in a weaker version, to what extent do we have to alter our innate sense of morality in order to bring it into line with the morality of the state?


You didnt write that, did you OG?
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 06:12 pm
it is rather eloquent isn't it? its from wikileaks but half the ******* page didnt paste w/e i dont care.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Thu 21 Feb, 2008 07:23 pm
Morality is the lack of opportunity or facility.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Ask yourself this question.
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 04/18/2024 at 10:47:15