Zippo wrote:This was a thread designed to maximize Obama's votes. One mistake, I should have also used his middle name "Hussain".
Barack 'Hussain' Obama - would have gotten Muslim votes
Using Obama's race to blame Blacks causing internal conflict - would have gotten white supremist votes
Obama nuking Iran - would have gotten Jewish votes
WIII idea - would have gotten republican votes
All the people who ignored my conspiracy - would have gotten Democratic votes
Green Witch, Why did you have to spoil it
Do you think you are using the forum for its original intent do discuss/debate political views? You don't seem to be involved in discussion nor debate, in my opinion, but something else? Would you be so kind to explain what you are attempting to effect with your posts? This one was not going to maximize Obama's votes, since every point you made, might have caused a vote against Obama by another group. Your above analysis, in my opinion, is one-sided; it doesn't allow for the reaction of other group's reaction to each point of yours.
And, Jews don't want Iran bombed, since there is still a 3,000 year old Jewish community in Iran, in addition to many innocent civilians of other religions. They might just prefer a new political administration. Do you think it appropriate to claim American Jews are willing to bomb a country?This accusation is really inappropriate.
And, how many people do you think read your posts, to affect the election? Also, in my opinion, this particular post is so convoluted, many readers may not have followed
your logic. "Word bites" Zippo. That's what the public is used to in the media.
Unless I'm totally incorrect of understanding your "posting history," you are pro-Palestinian. If that is correct, then McCain would be your preferred choice of candidate, since his willingness to have a United States presence in the Middle East for a very long time would give stability to the region that would allow for a
stable two-state solution with the Palestinians and the Israelis. Barack, perhaps, wouldn't even be inclined to
broker a two-state solution, since he seems to be more oriented towards a U.S. that becomes more concerned with the folks back home. In other words, stability to the Middle East cost shekels; if money is going to social programs in the U.S., under a Democratic administration, guess what would likely be put on a back burner.