0
   

Important Stories Hidden By The Election

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Mar, 2008 08:43 am
Advocate wrote:
blatham, good piece! I am very shocked that any AG, except for Alberto, would so rule. The ruling goes against our democratic principles, and amounts to an exercise of brutal political power.


advocate
If you haven't read this piece yet, I recommend it highly.
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/20858




On another matter, there's the issue of the WH aide's plagiarism but more importantly, there's the issue of the modern conservative movement's ethos that NOTHING (or damn near nothing) is more importanat than gaining and maintaining power. To the degree we don't fully appreciate this reality, to that degree we will fail to strategize effectively against them.

Quote:
Goeglein gets standing ovation from conservative crowd
March 6, 1:28 AM

Tim Goeglein has had a tough week, but he still has friends in the "right" places. The former White House aide in charge of religious and conservative outreach resigned late last week after admitting he plagiarized pieces he wrote for the News-Sentinel of Fort Wayne, Ind. Goeglein took passages from Pope John Paul II and Dartmouth professor Jeffery Hart, among others.

But Goeglein is still embraced by the conservative community. At the weekly meeting of center-right leaders at American for Tax Reform [this is Grover Norquist's co-ordination meeting] on Wednesday morning, he received three rounds of applause from the packed room, including one standing ovation, as he asked for their forgiveness.

Via e-mail, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino told us, "We strongly appreciate Tim's service and many contributions, and we have been saddened by the situation."
http://www.examiner.com/blogs/Yeas_and_Nays/2008/3/6/Goeglein-gets-standing-ovation-from-conservative-crowd?cid=rss-Yeas_and_Nays
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 Mar, 2008 12:15 pm
One question... are you saying the democrats are just holding onto their hate America propaganda? What a farce!

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=278808786575124

CAN YOU DIG INTO THE SEWER A BIT MORE?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Mar, 2008 08:34 pm
The worms are turning. Back to the sewer, digging deep.

Quote:


Ex-Defense Official Assails Colleagues Over Run-Up to War

By Thomas E. Ricks and Karen DeYoung
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, March 9, 2008; A01

In the first insider account of Pentagon decision-making on Iraq, one of the key architects of the war blasts former secretary of state Colin Powell, the CIA, retired Gen. Tommy R. Franks and former Iraq occupation chief L. Paul Bremer for mishandling the run-up to the invasion and the subsequent occupation of the country.

Douglas J. Feith, in a massive score-settling work, portrays an intelligence community and a State Department that repeatedly undermined plans he developed as undersecretary of defense for policy and conspired to undercut President Bush's policies.

Among the disclosures made by Feith in "War and Decision," scheduled for release next month by HarperCollins, is Bush's declaration, at a Dec. 18, 2002, National Security Council meeting, that "war is inevitable." The statement came weeks before U.N. weapons inspectors reported their initial findings on Iraq and months before Bush delivered an ultimatum to Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. Feith, who says he took notes at the meeting, registered it as a "momentous comment."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/08/AR2008030802724_pf.html


0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 08:54 am
Quote:
Signs of life from House Democratic leaders

Fully recognizing it may not last any longer than a couple of weeks, it's actually necessary to give some credit where it's due -- to the House Democratic leadership. Nobody expected that they would ever allow the Protect America Act to expire, yet they did. And nobody expected, especially after the meek and incoherent appearance of Silvestre Reyes on CNN last weekend, that they would ignore the barrage of Terrorist-Lover accusations from the President and unveil yet another bill that is actually decent and refuses to bestow lawbreaking telecoms with amnesty, but they now have.

Add to that the fact that they actually seem serious about pursuing a court battle to force Josh Bolton and Harriet Miers to comply with their Subpoenas, and one detects a possible change in their approach. There is perhaps a stirring of recognition among House Democrats that there is no political cost to standing against this President on vital matters -- even ones involving the magic Terrorism word -- and there might even be real political benefit...
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/?last_story=/opinion/greenwald/2008/03/12/house_democrats/
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Mar, 2008 02:19 pm
blatham wrote:
Quote:
Signs of life from House Democratic leaders

Fully recognizing it may not last any longer than a couple of weeks, it's actually necessary to give some credit where it's due -- to the House Democratic leadership. Nobody expected that they would ever allow the Protect America Act to expire, yet they did. And nobody expected, especially after the meek and incoherent appearance of Silvestre Reyes on CNN last weekend, that they would ignore the barrage of Terrorist-Lover accusations from the President and unveil yet another bill that is actually decent and refuses to bestow lawbreaking telecoms with amnesty, but they now have.

Add to that the fact that they actually seem serious about pursuing a court battle to force Josh Bolton and Harriet Miers to comply with their Subpoenas, and one detects a possible change in their approach. There is perhaps a stirring of recognition among House Democrats that there is no political cost to standing against this President on vital matters -- even ones involving the magic Terrorism word -- and there might even be real political benefit...
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/?last_story=/opinion/greenwald/2008/03/12/house_democrats/


But they still failed by 51 votes to override the presidents vetop.
What does that say?
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 12:06 pm
It wont be a problem after the coming election.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 06:13 pm
The Dems are 6 gets you 4.

If you are so sure I would get the house on and keep quiet about it in case you shorten the price before you've sold the fixtures and fittings.

Anybody who thinks the problems are going to be solved by the upcoming election is into escapism bigtime.

Would it were so easy.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 07:21 am
Once again, at the behest of business, this administration behave with zero regard for anything but corporate profits.

Quote:
Ozone Rules Weakened at Bush's Behest
EPA Scrambles To Justify Action

By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 14, 2008; Page A01

The Environmental Protection Agency weakened one part of its new limits on smog-forming ozone after an unusual last-minute intervention by President Bush, according to documents released by the EPA.

EPA officials initially tried to set a lower seasonal limit on ozone to protect wildlife, parks and farmland, as required under the law. While their proposal was less restrictive than what the EPA's scientific advisers had proposed, Bush overruled EPA officials and on Tuesday ordered the agency to increase the limit, according to the documents.

"It is unprecedented and an unlawful act of political interference for the president personally to override a decision that the Clean Air Act leaves exclusively to EPA's expert scientific judgment," said John Walke, clean-air director for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The president's order prompted a scramble by administration officials to rewrite the regulations to avoid a conflict with past EPA statements on the harm caused by ozone.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/13/AR2008031304175.html?nav=hcmodule
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:07 pm
Bernie quoted-

Quote:
Miliband admits US rendition flights stopped on UK soil

Britain acknowledged today for the first time that US planes on "extraordinary rendition" flights stopped on British soil twice.

The admission came from the foreign secretary, David Miliband, who apologised to MPs for wrong information given by his predecessor Jack Straw and former prime minister Tony Blair.


I had that on the Brit thread the day it happened.

Mr Milliband announced the rendition flight/s being serviced, presumably by arrangement, at a British base half-an-hour before the guilty verdicts in the Ipswich serial prostitute killer trial.

There was "shock and consternation" for 30 minutes and then BREAKING NEWS and over to our reporter on the steps of Ipswich Crown Court.

The TV companies were ready. Raring to go in fact with stuff that can't be used until after a guilty verdict which everybody knew it would be including Mr Milliband.

So he was tipped the wink that the jury had reached a verdict and he knew that it takes a while to convene the court (30 mins) to hear it given.

So he announces the shocking news that we had been servicing rendition flights. Hardly had we got our breath when Ipswich arrived.

After that it was all day and night on the sordid details. They even stopped the adverts and that's a telling sign. They went to town.

They even had a helicopter follow the prison van taking the convicted man for miles delivering him to jail.

Every detail was covered. All sorts of interviews. CCTV footage. Red Light district. DNA spashes. etc etc etc. It was sickening.

I switched it off because I don't like seeing people on TV mopping droolings off their chins.

The rendition flight saga was as dead as yesterday's rhubarb pie and it wasn't buried by the American election at all.

As that is the topic of the thread the threadmaster is deemed to be "off topic". Not that I mind. It's instructive.

I like to see the lengths Bernie will go to paint a picture of us all as victims of an evil conspiracy and thus hint that with him at the helm we would be rescued from such a humiliating plight.

And here's me been watching the Cheltenham Festival sprawled across my sofa and backing the two winners of the main events. (2 out of 2), complaining about too much coriander in my soup, having the crack on A2K, a short nap, hot soak and in the pub getting stuck into my daily ration of liquid health food and watching the Test Match from Wellington N.Z. on the giant plasma which, on reflection, made me think that the earth might be flat after all.

And here's Bernie trying to cast me as a victim of an evil conspiracy.

I could understand it if I was an Pakistan earthquake victim. Has that been buried too by all the excitement.

What about all the stories we don't even know have been buried.

The rendition flight story never got buried at all for those who didn't forget about it and the same applies to the victims of all the other catastrophes. To suggest otherwise is insulting but I know that socialists are unable to avoid insulting people in this manner. It is second nature to them. They feel superior you see. Especially when trying to bury The Bible or the Malleus Malifacarum or the 7 Deadly sins and a few other things.

I think your socialism Bernie is strictly for local application.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Mar, 2008 09:15 pm
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4198

Quote:
The U.S. Military Index

Page 1 of 9
March/April 2008
In an exclusive new index, Foreign Policy and the Center for a New American Security surveyed more than 3,400 active and retired officers at the highest levels of command about the state of the U.S. military. They see a force stretched dangerously thin and a country ill-prepared for the next fight.


I could cut and paste just about every paragraph in the nine pages.

I recommend the read while it's available (free, though you may need to register).


http://www.foreignpolicy.com/images/mi-index/stronger-weaker.jpg


http://www.foreignpolicy.com/images/mi-index/forcestrength.jpg

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/images/mi-index/broken.jpg



from page 1

Quote:
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Mar, 2008 09:30 pm
And again, government agencies charged with the task of protecting citizens functioning instead as protectors of corporate profits.

Quote:
Lawmakers Probe EPA Conflicts

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: March 17, 2008
Filed at 8:08 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A House committee opened an investigation Monday into potential conflicts of interest in scientific panels that advise the Environmental Protection Agency.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee cited the case of eight scientists who were consultants or members of EPA science advisory panels assessing the human health effects of toxic chemicals while getting research support from the chemical industry on the same chemicals they were examining.

In two cases, EPA advisers were employed by companies that made or worked with manufacturers of the chemicals being evaluated. the committee said.

Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., the committee's chairman, said such conflicts appear to be in stark contrast to EPA's decision last summer to remove a public health scientist and expert in toxicology, from a panel examining the health impacts of a flame retardant because of critical comments she made about the chemical.

The American Chemistry Council, the industry trade group, had called for the removal of Deborah Rice, a toxicologist from Maine, as chairman of an independent EPA panel assessing the health risks from ''deca'', a flame retardant in electronic equipment, after she urged the Maine state legislature to ban the chemical.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-EPA-Science.html
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Mar, 2008 10:55 pm
Why does anyone even bother to listen to him anymore. Why don't people just say, "Stop lying, Mr President, we've had enough. Do the honorable thing and resign. Let someone who's competent step in."

Quote:
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2008 08:42 am
Quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/28/us/28alabama.html
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2008 07:23 am
Quote:
Official Says HUD Chief Leaving

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: March 31, 2008
Filed at 8:49 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson is resigning Monday, according to a government official.

Jackson is under criminal investigation at the same time the housing industry is in a crisis so serious that it has imperiled the nation's credit markets, placing the country on the brink of what some economists predict will be a major recession.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-HUD-Chief.html
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2008 10:19 am
Quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/30/washington/30nsa.html?_r=2&ref=us&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2008 10:47 am
Quote:
FCC opens inquiry into Siegelman report blackout
Remember the curious glitch that prevented a CBS affliliate in northern Alabama from airing the recent 60 Minutes' report -- and that report only -- on the politics behind the controversial prosecution of former Gov. Don Siegelman? Well, the Federal Communications Commission has launched an inquiry into the incident, Reuters reports:
The FCC issued a "notice of inquiry" to WHNT, a CBS affiliate in Huntsville, Alabama, in connection with an outage that cut off a segment of the February 24 broadcast of "60 Minutes," an FCC spokeswoman said.

WHNT, which has blamed the black-out on equipment failure, has 30 days to respond with an explanation of what happened in the incident.
The inquiry came at the request of Commissioner Michael Copps, one of two Democratic appointees on the five-member body. The agency's chairman, Kevin Martin, is a Republican.

WHNT is owned by an investment firm whose founder's family has close ties to the Bushes, and it's managed by Local TV, a company headed by a former Clear Channel Communications executive and major Bush contributor. After initially blaming the blackout on a CBS transmission problem, the station management has since maintained that the problem was caused at the receiving end by an equipment failure that cut off the feed. The station later re-aired the segment twice.
http://southernstudies.org/facingsouth/2008/03/fcc-opens-inquiry-into-siegelman-report.asp
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Mar, 2008 10:53 am
Quote:
The Federal Communications Commission has launched an official inquiry into the blackout. But legal experts say that, even if WHNT acted purposefully, and for the most naked political reasons, the station could at worst walk away with a slap on the wrist. In fact, they say, years of deregulation have left broadcasters with broad freedoms over the content they air, and their reasons for doing so.

"If they say, 'Look, we're owned by conservative Republicans and we don't want to show something that makes the party look bad,' they can do it," said Michael Botein, director of the Media Law Center at New York Law School. "There are almost no rules today."

Andrew Jay Schwartzman, president and CEO of the Media Access Project, a nonprofit First Amendment watchdog group, said that Reagan-era deregulation could, indeed, allow broadcasters to black out programs of their choosing. Even if WHNT is found to have acted "for the most nefarious reasons," Schwartzman said, "it's not at all clear that any violation of any FCC regulation was involved."
http://www.washingtonindependent.com/view/what-happened-to-the
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2008 06:49 am
Not really a very important story but the advisory council's vote (20 to 3) holding that the science didn't back up reclassification is notable. And, if Brown decides to ignore that scientific consensus that too will be notable for it's political pandering.

Quote:
Gordon Brown's desire to see cannabis reclassified as a Class B drug has received a setback after it emerged that the Government's drug advisory body has decided to recommend it stays in the less serious Class C category.

The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) decided at a private meeting yesterday that it will not recommend reclassifying the drug, after 20 of its 23 experts voted there was not sufficient new scientific evidence to justify a change, The Times has learned.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3673602.ece
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2008 07:36 am
Krugman has been writing about this for a while...

Quote:
World Bank Chief Calls for Immediate Action on Deepening Global Food Crisis

By Harry Dunphy
Associated Press
Monday, April 14, 2008; Page A08

The president of the World Bank yesterday urged immediate action to deal with sharply rising food prices, which have caused hunger and violence in several countries.

Robert B. Zoellick said the international community has to "put our money where our mouth is" now to help hungry people. Zoellick spoke as the bank and its sister institution, the International Monetary Fund, ended two days of meetings in Washington.

He called on governments to rapidly carry out commitments to provide the U.N. World Food Program with $500 million in emergency aid by May 1. Prices have only risen further since the program issued that appeal, so it is urgent that governments step up, he said.

Zoellick said that the fall of the government in Haiti over the weekend after a wave of deadly rioting and looting over food prices underscores the importance of quick international action.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/13/AR2008041301972.html?hpid=sec-world
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Apr, 2008 09:37 am
Blatham
Blatham, I think we must give up on the idea of using corn to produce ethanal for vehicle fuel. We cannot divert corn (and any other food grains) for that purpose. We can't produce enough grain to feed the hungry in poor nations. Even in the developed countries, the cost of grains is causing higher prices at a time when our economy is in the tank.

We probably can copy Brazil and use sugar as a source, but I think we must turn our attention to waste fibre to produce ethanal. That would have two benefits. Reducing landfill waste and providing less expensive fuel.

I, personally, don't favor putting all of our eggs in the ethanal basket. I think it was urged because farmers wanted it to increase their income.

I prefer that we concentrate on battery operated hybrid cars. It's the most sensible solution to the fuel problem and will reduce greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. There is a great film everyone should watch: "Who Killed the Electric Cars?" It will make you angry that once again, the special interests killed another good idea for the common good, just as the oil, tire and auto industries did to kill public transportation decades ago.

In 1996, electric cars began to appear on roads all over California. They were quiet and fast, produced no exhaust and ran without gasoline. Ten years later, these cars were destroyed by their manufacturers because they didn't make as much profit as their gas guzzlers provided.

http://www.sonyclassics.com/whokilledtheelectriccar/electric.html

BBB
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/09/2024 at 07:56:12