0
   

President Obama

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Roxxxanne
 
Reply Tue 12 Feb, 2008 06:34 pm
Has a funny but nice ring to it. We better all get used to hearing it.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,252 • Replies: 20
No top replies

 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Feb, 2008 06:36 pm
Still have 19 states to go.....
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Feb, 2008 06:47 pm
Let's not get ahead of ourselves.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Feb, 2008 07:04 pm
Put a knife in Hillary, she is done.

And McCain has no chance against Obama. None.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Feb, 2008 07:58 am
Roxxxanne wrote:
Put a knife in Hillary, she is done.

And McCain has no chance against Obama. None.

Remember Glenn Close in "Fatal Attraction"? I wouldn't count Clinton out, but she definitely got plastered in Virginia. I thought she would do better there. Still, I think Texas is a wrap for her and Ohio is hers to lose, so don't turn your back to the tub.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Feb, 2008 09:24 am
Roxxxanne wrote:
Put a knife in Hillary, she is done.

And McCain has no chance against Obama. None.


Why does McCain have no shot against Obama?
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Feb, 2008 03:30 pm
Why does McCain have no shot against Obama?
Obviousley because
he got fed up with American misadventure around the globe.

Those who are behind this
barbaric banal show are not yet out.
The dolls are dancing.
The demons are invisible..

None will change this.
Dreams
0 Replies
 
vid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Feb, 2008 04:01 pm
woiyo wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
Put a knife in Hillary, she is done.

And McCain has no chance against Obama. None.


Why does McCain have no shot against Obama?


I think that McCain shouldn't be written off just yet, but the young seem to be voting in large numbers this time around, and seem to be getting behind Obama. They may just tip the balance, IMO.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Feb, 2008 09:35 pm
woiyo wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
Put a knife in Hillary, she is done.

And McCain has no chance against Obama. None.


Why does McCain have no shot against Obama?


LOL

See ya in November
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 07:03 am
Roxxxanne wrote:
woiyo wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
Put a knife in Hillary, she is done.

And McCain has no chance against Obama. None.


Why does McCain have no shot against Obama?


LOL

See ya in November


Very astute reply. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 07:12 am
Oh, I think that Obama has an excellent shot at the presidency. If I were 22, and still bright eyed and bushy tailed, I too might have been caught up in all that warm fuzziness.

What I am thinking about is a couple of years from now, when all the Obama groupies are shaking their heads and saying, " Whatever WERE we thinking, when we pinned our hopes on that guy"?

The shock may be coming. Don't be surprised when the reality hits!!!
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 07:16 am
Phoenix, did you bother to read anything I posted on your "Media creation" thread?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 07:17 am
That said, I agree that it's way premature to be talking about "President Obama." Looking pretty good this morning, but a whole lot of time left in which a whole lot could happen.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 07:20 am
sozobe wrote:
Phoenix, did you bother to read anything I posted on your "Media creation" thread?




Yes I did!

Soz- I think that it looks like he may very well win. I have made my statement about my "take" on him. I will say no more about it, but let's hold this discussion for a couple of years from now.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 07:27 am
If anything, you have to be shocked by how poorly Clinton ran in Wisconsin. With the exception of a few rural counties, she lost everywhere. In the urban centers, she lost by 30%. She lost across almost every demographic. I really thought the Clinton campaign would have tried to fight even in Wisconsin to build some momentum before Ohio and Texas. Now, she not only needs to win Ohio and Texas, but win them big. A 52/48 win is as good as a loss when she was favored by double digits a week ago. Of course, you could restate this as "how well Obama ran", but I saw Wisconsin as a real test for the Clinton team.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 07:33 am
Phoenix32890 wrote:
sozobe wrote:
Phoenix, did you bother to read anything I posted on your "Media creation" thread?




Yes I did!

Soz- I think that it looks like he may very well win. I have made my statement about my "take" on him. I will say no more about it, but let's hold this discussion for a couple of years from now.


OK.

Part of what I'm pointing to when I say that is my statements about how I DON'T think Obama is perfect, by a long shot. I DO think he's the best of the current field. I think -- based on a lot of research -- that I'd be far MORE disappointed in a President Clinton (take two) or President McCain. That doesn't mean that I will be universally thrilled with a President Obama.

engineer, I agree. I think it's some of each, but I do think that the Clinton campaign has been run badly, especially post- super Tuesday. And I do think that some extrapolations can be made about that.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 07:37 am
Soz, pardon me for interrupting, but are you still in the McCain camp?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 07:39 am
Diehard!
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 07:40 am
Phoenix32890 wrote:
sozobe wrote:
Phoenix, did you bother to read anything I posted on your "Media creation" thread?




Yes I did!

Soz- I think that it looks like he may very well win. I have made my statement about my "take" on him. I will say no more about it, but let's hold this discussion for a couple of years from now.

Should we get there, let's hold the discussion eight years from now. If you evaluated Bill Clinton after two years, you would have called him a disaster (and perhaps you still do Laughing ); if you had looked at GW Bush after two years you might have been very happy.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Feb, 2008 07:40 am
Excellent! I feel he will return the country to the greatness of the Reagan years. I only lament the fact that Bush can not serve yet another term.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » President Obama
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/27/2025 at 12:43:04
▲ ▼