NanoDog wrote:sigh..
ok..
I just thought I was missing something.
I think you are missing the fact that when using surface water for the source of your drinking water, that's prior to water wells, man ingested usually softer waters than we do today when most of our water is ground water coming from wells AND...
The info in your quote is anti water softeners. As most water companies and universities and guv'mint agencies are because they don't want people clamoring for softening of all the water the water companies produce, distribute and sell residences, commercial establishments and industries that can not have hard water damaging their water using appliances, fixtures and/or plumbing and manufacturing processes and products. Not to mention their hair, skin, clothes and all fabrics etc. washed in hard water.
The AWWA (American Water Works Assoc.) and its water company membership say that water is soft until it has more than 150-180 mg/l of hardness in it. That is from 8.77 to 10.5 gpg! No one other than the guv'mint agrees though, because they see the outcome of using water that hard.
BTW, when you soften the cold water to the water heater only, and then mix any hard cold water with softened hot water, you are using hard water, and that is a very dumb idea IMO. And all you have done is to prevent scale build up in the heater, you still have all the problems of hard water everywhere else in the building.
You should also look up how much water a person has to drink to get any measurable benefit from the minerals it. I can tell you that the amount is substantial.
Also, that 80 mg/l of added sodium if 10 gpg hardness is removed by an ion exchange softener... check the label of a loaf of white bread for sodium and you normally see 120-160 mg PER SLICE. A glass of skim milk has much more than a liter (roughly a quart) of that softened water; 40+% more.
I question why the universities etc. don't mention any of that in there dissertation on hard water and ion exchange water softeners.... To me it makes them sound as if they are agenda driven; and I've been reading their stuff for over 20 years, it is always the same stuff, with a new revision date and different author.