I hate to break the news to you, but they already do.
So I suppose that makes it okay for you to do the same?
And obviously he means some Republicans, certainly not all.
Possibly that was what was meant by the title; but, there ain't no indication that is the case, so yes, you assume which is generally a flaw.
uh, sturgis, have you noticed the names people like oralloy and h2oman have been using for years for democrats? not to mention the haters on radio and the media, like rush limbaugh, ann coulter, michael savage, and on and on
Why yes, yes I have. That doesn't make the title of this thread any better by using that as your comparitory place.
ok - so respond to the issue/s presented in those links
I will respond to what I damn well feel like. If I am addressing the title and my reaction towards that, then that is what I am addressing. If I so choose as to address the statements in the links, then that is what I will be opting to do.
In your dizzying dash to run in and defend DrewDad, you failed dreadfully.
You did not address the said links yourself, instead choosing to chastise me for not responding to the thread in the way you want it.
Then again, DrewDad didn't address the links directly either, just made a thread with an intentionally inflammatory title and slapped up some links....no actual comments on the links.
So tell me, why should I address the links themselves if all you can do is come in and make useless comments and even the thread starter can't be bothered addressing them?