Main Entry: 1slave
Pronunciation: 'slAv
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English sclave, from Old French or Medieval Latin; Old French esclave, from Medieval Latin sclavus, from Sclavus Slavic; from the frequent enslavement of Slavs in central Europe
Date: 14th century
1 : a person held in servitude as the chattel of another
2 : one that is completely subservient to a dominating influence
3 : a device (as the printer of a computer) that is directly responsive to another
4 : DRUDGE, TOILER
- slave adjective
Main Entry: slav·ery
Pronunciation: 'slA-v(&-)rE
Function: noun
Date: 1551
1 : DRUDGERY, TOIL
2 : submission to a dominating influence
3 a : the state of a person who is a chattel of another b : the practice of slaveholding
Main Entry: chat·tel
Pronunciation: 'cha-t&l
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English chatel property, from Middle French, from Medieval Latin capitale -- more at CATTLE
Date: 14th century
1 : an item of tangible movable or immovable property except real estate, freehold, and things (as buildings) connected with real property
2 : SLAVE, BONDSMAN
Main Entry: 2del·e·gate
Pronunciation: -"gAt
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): -gat·ed; -gat·ing
Date: 1530
transitive senses
1 : to entrust to another <delegate authority>
2 : to appoint as one's representative
intransitive senses : to assign responsibility or authority
- del·e·ga·tee /"de-li-g&-'tE/ noun
- del·e·ga·tor /'de-li-"gA-t&r/ noun
Main Entry: 1pow·er
Pronunciation: 'pau(-&)r
Function: noun
Usage: often attributive
Etymology: Middle English, from Old French poeir, from poeir to be able, from (assumed) Vulgar Latin potEre, alteration of Latin posse -- more at POTENT
Date: 13th century
1 a (1) : ability to act or produce an effect (2) : ability to get extra-base hits (3) : capacity for being acted upon or undergoing an effect b : legal or official authority, capacity, or right
2 a : possession of control, authority, or influence over others b : one having such power; specifically : a sovereign state c : a controlling group : ESTABLISHMENT -- often used in the phrase the powers that be d archaic : a force of armed men e chiefly dialect : a large number or quantity
3 a : physical might b : mental or moral efficacy c : political control or influence
4 plural : an order of angels -- see CELESTIAL HIERARCHY
5 a : the number of times as indicated by an exponent that a number occurs as a factor in a product; also : the product itself b : CARDINAL NUMBER 2
6 a : a source or means of supplying energy; especially : ELECTRICITY b : MOTIVE POWER c : the time rate at which work is done or energy emitted or transferred
7 : MAGNIFICATION 2b
8 : 1SCOPE 3
9 : the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis in a statistical test when a particular alternative hypothesis happens to be true
synonyms POWER, AUTHORITY, JURISDICTION, CONTROL, COMMAND, SWAY, DOMINION mean the right to govern or rule or determine. POWER implies possession of ability to wield force, permissive authority, or substantial influence <the power to mold public opinion>. AUTHORITY implies the granting of power for a specific purpose within specified limits <gave her attorney the authority to manage her estate>. JURISDICTION applies to official power exercised within prescribed limits <the bureau having jurisdiction over alcohol and firearms>. CONTROL stresses the power to direct and restrain <you are responsible for the students under your control>. COMMAND implies the power to make arbitrary decisions and compel obedience <the army officer in command>. SWAY suggests the extent or scope of exercised power or influence <an empire that extended its sway over the known world>. DOMINION stresses sovereign power or supreme authority <given dominion over all the animals>.
synonyms POWER, FORCE, ENERGY, STRENGTH, MIGHT mean the ability to exert effort. POWER may imply latent or exerted physical, mental, or spiritual ability to act or be acted upon <the awesome power of flowing water>. FORCE implies the actual effective exercise of power <used enough force to push the door open>. ENERGY applies to power expended or capable of being transformed into work <a worker with boundless energy>. STRENGTH applies to the quality or property of a person or thing that makes possible the exertion of force or the withstanding of strain, pressure, or attack <use weight training to build your strength>. MIGHT implies great or overwhelming power or strength <the belief that might makes right>.
Main Entry: 2right
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English riht, from riht, adjective
Date: before 12th century
1 : qualities (as adherence to duty or obedience to lawful authority) that together constitute the ideal of moral propriety or merit moral approval
2 : something to which one has a just claim: as a : the power or privilege to which one is justly entitled b (1) : the interest that one has in a piece of property -- often used in plural <mineral rights> (2) plural : the property interest possessed under law or custom and agreement in an intangible thing especially of a literary and artistic nature <film rights of the novel>
3 : something that one may properly claim as due
4 : the cause of truth or justice
5 a : RIGHT HAND 1a; also : a blow struck with this hand <gave him a hard right on the jaw> b : the location or direction of the right side <woods on his right> c : the part on the right side d : RIGHT FIELD
6 a : the true account or correct interpretation b : the quality or state of being factually correct
7 often capitalized a : the part of a legislative chamber located to the right of the presiding officer b : the members of a continental European legislative body occupying the right as a result of holding more conservative political views than other members
8 a often capitalized : individuals sometimes professing opposition to change in the established order and favoring traditional attitudes and practices and sometimes advocating the forced establishment of an authoritarian order (as in government) b often capitalized : a conservative position
9 a : a privilege given stockholders to subscribe pro rata to a new issue of securities generally below market price b : the negotiable certificate evidencing such privilege -- usually used in plural
- right·most /-"mOst/ adjective
- by rights : with reason or justice : PROPERLY
- in one's own right : by virtue of one's own qualifications or properties
- of right 1 : as an absolute right 2 : legally or morally exactable
- to rights : into proper order
We recommend that the lawsuit that follows be filed in each one of the 88 federal district courts in the country.
WE FREE CITIZENS OF THESE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING IN ACCORD WITH OUR OWN JUDGMENTS, CONSCIENCES, AND FREE WILL, FILE THIS LAWSUIT IN ORDER TO BETTER SERVE THE INTERESTS OF OUR POSTERITY
We accuse past and present members of the Congress, past and present members of the Supreme Court, and past Presidents and the present President, of not complying with their oaths or affirmations to support the Constitution of the United States of America as lawfully amended. Their failures to comply with their oaths or affirmations constitute the perpetration of high crimes. We direct these perpetrators of high crimes to cease and desist perpetrating these high crimes or resign from office.
PREAMBLE
We fully support without any reservation Our Declaration of Independence (hereinafter, ODOI). We believe that ALL innocent people are equally endowed with certain unalienable rights. As specified in ODOI, these rights include, but are not limited to, the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. As forecast in ODOI, we the people of the United States of America instituted our government in order to secure these rights for each of us and for our posterity.
Our Constitution As Lawfully Amended (hereinafter, OCALA) specifies those powers we the people delegated to our republic for securing our rights. OCALA expressly denies our republic any other powers. OCALA also specifies those rights we shall not have and some of the rights we do have. OCALA also explicitly specifies that we the people retain additional rights not denied by OCALA and not specified by OCALA, including, but not limited to, the exclusive ownership of our individual selves by our individual selves. In addition, our individual selves own that property which we individually have obtained lawfully. Our money property paid in the form of taxes to enable government to secure our rights is justly compensated. Our money property paid in the form of taxes to enable government to achieve other purposes is not justly compensated.
We willingly and knowingly pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands: one nation under God; indivisible; with liberty and justice for all. By virtue of this our pledge, we have knowingly chosen to obligate ourselves as free citizens of these United States of America to take such lawful action we judge is most likely to preserve our republic for us and our posterity.
FIRST HIGH CRIME
The Government of the United States of America is currently exercising the power to compel the transfer of property between Americans for purposes other than those specified in OCALA. These powers have NOT been delegated to the Government of the United States of America by OCALA. Consequently, the Government of the United States of America is usurping these powers, is thereby violating "the supreme Law of the Land," and is thereby perpetrating a high crime.
Specifically, the Government of the United States of America is:
a. Taxing younger people in order to pay retirement income to older people, who are neither federal government employees or federal government contractors;
b. Taxing younger people in order to pay for medical treatment of older people, who are neither federal government employees or government contractors;
c. Taxing some of us in order to pay others of us, who are neither federal government employees or federal government contractors, to educate still others of us;
d. Taxing some of us in order to grant and/or loan money to others of us, who are neither federal government employees or federal government contractors;
e. Taxing some of us in order to provide income to others of us, who are neither federal government employees or federal government contractors.
SECOND HIGH CRIME
The government of the United States of America is exercising the power to exempt and tax our individual dollars of income differently depending on the circumstances under which they have been received, held, spent, or transferred, when that power has NOT been delegated to the Government of the United States of America by OCALA. Consequently the Government of the United States of America is usurping these powers, and is thereby violating "the supreme Law of the Land," and is thereby perpetrating a high crime.
Specifically, the Government of the United States of America is exempting and taxing the individual dollars of income and/or revenue received by persons according to:
a. How much income a person has received;
b. When a person received that income;
c. Who (e.g., age, responsibilities, etc.) received that income;
d. What is the vocation of that person who receives that income;
e. Why the person received that income;
f. How much income that person received within a given time;
g. How much income that person received up to that given time;
h. How that income is transferred or spent; and,
i. Under what conditions the person received that income.
WE SEEK THIS REMEDY
According to the 10th Amendment to OCALA, our federal government has only those powers delegated to it by OCALA. According to the 9th Amendment to OCALA, we individually have all those rights not prohibited us by OCALA. According to the 5th, 9th, and 10th Amendments, each and everyone of us has the same privileges and immunities, the same rights to life, liberty, property, the same rights to due process of law, the same rights to equal protection of the law, and the same rights to just compensation for such of our property taken for a public use. Any action by our federal government to deny us, the innocent, those rights constitutes a high crime and we direct such denial of our rights cease immediately.
Our federal government was not delegated by OCALA the power to perpetrate the high crimes specified above. On the contrary, our federal government is expressly denied by OCALA’s 9th and 10th Amendments the power to perpetrate the high crimes specified above. Nor does OCALA DENY us, the people, the right to direct our federal government to cease and desist perpetrating these high crimes.
Therefore, we direct our federal government to cease and desist, now and in the future, perpetrating both of the high crimes specified above.
THE HIGH NECESSITY FOR TERMINATING OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S PERPETRATION OF THE SPECIFIED HIGH CRIMES
I. Liberty lovers must recognize that they act as their own enemies when they use their liberty and representative majority to aid and abet the transfer property from those who have less to those who have more, or to transfer property from those who have more to those who have less. When they aid or abet either of these, they are perpetrating a theft. They are thereby violating the law; they are perpetrating a felony; they are corroding respect for the rule of law; they are encouraging the stifling of their own liberty; they are destroying the viability of our republic; and, they are committing a high crime. Their posterity will surely suffer from such behavior if it is allowed to continue.
II. It is especially true that our posterity will suffer loss of political privileges, if our objective is to achieve equal social privileges or equal economic privileges among all persons. Equal social, equal political, and equal economic privileges are mutually contradictory:
1. Equal social privileges include the right of the innocent to equal status;
2. Equal economic privileges include the right of the innocent to equal property;
3. Equal political privileges include the right of the innocent to equal liberty.
Enforcement of equal status among all innocent people precludes enforcement of equal property, and equal liberty. With enforcement of equal status, those with superior talent (e.g., knowledge, skills, judgment, and accomplishments) will have their liberty and property reduced in direct proportion to their talents in order to achieve equal status. The most talented will suffer the most reduction of their property and liberty, and the least talented will suffer the least reduction of their property and liberty.
Similarly, enforcement of equal property among all innocent people precludes enforcement of equal status and equal liberty. With enforcement of equal property, those with superior talent will have their status and liberty reduced in direct proportion to their talents in order to achieve equal property. The most talented will suffer the most reduction of their status and liberty, and the least talented will suffer the least reduction of their status and liberty.
Enforcement of equal liberty among all innocent people precludes enforcement of equal status and equal property. However, with enforcement of equal liberty, those with superior talent will achieve more status and more property, while those with less talent will achieve less status and less property. This is true because increased honorable application of one’s own liberty produces more not less status, and more not less private property, while decreased honorable application of liberty produces less not more status, and less not more private property,
Thus, the unequal talents among innocent people must by themselves, and not by government coercion, determine a person’s status and property in order for them to enjoy equal liberty as stipulated by our Declaration of Independence. Otherwise, achieving equality of status or equality of property, precludes achieving equal liberty.
Equal liberty requires a rule of law that is not different for individuals according to differences in the property they receive in mutually voluntary transactions. Equal liberty requires a rule of law that uniformly protects the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States and does not deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Failure of our republican government to abide by these principles will inevitably lead to the dissolution of our republic and its replacement by anarchy and/or tyranny.
III. Failure to obey the rule of law will encourage the birth of factions that will seek their ends by use of deceit and/or force. Failure to obey the rule of law by us in order to maintain the comforts of some at the expense of the comforts of others is never worth the damage it shall certainly do to our posterity.
The use of deceit and/or force breeds the use of deceit and/or force. Inevitably, a faction shall rise for the purpose of forcefully removing from government all those in government who disobey the rule of law with respect to rights of property and/or to rights of innocent vocations. Another faction shall also arise for the purpose of forcefully practicing pernicious coveting (i.e., the striving to reduce and/or transfer to them selves what others have).
Each of these factions shall be corrupted by any increase in their power over that specified in OCALA. That corruption shall lead them to escalate their use of deceit and/or force until they finally shall deny those who oppose them their rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Such events shall of course lead to the cessation of our republic in the same manner and for the same reasons as republics have historically ceased to exist.
THE OPINION OF EXPERT WITNESSES IN SUPPORT OF THE NECESSITY FOR TERMINATING OUR GOVERNMENT’S PERPETRATION OF THE SPECIFIED HIGH CRIMES
I. Alexander Tyler writing about the viability of democracy, in "The Cycle of Democracy", 1778:
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasure. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most money from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy followed by a dictatorship."
Let’s do what is necessary to be the exception!
II. Alexander Hamilton supporting the adoption of OCALA, in "Federalist Paper No. 1", 1788:
"It has been frequently remarked that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force. If there be any truth in the remark, the crisis at which we are arrived may with propriety be regarded as the era in which that decision is to be made; and a wrong election of the part we shall act may, in this view, deserve to be considered as the general misfortune of mankind."
Now it is our turn to make the right election!
III. John Jay supporting the adoption of OCALA, in"“Federalist Paper No. 5", 1788:
"Distrust naturally creates distrust, and by nothing is good-will and kind conduct more speedily changed than by invidious jealousies and uncandid imputations, whether expressed or implied."
Let’s breed trust by compelling faithful adherence to the rule of law!
IV. James Madison supporting the adoption of OCALA, in "Federalist Paper No. 10", 1788:
"The influence of factious leaders may kindle a flame within their particular States, but will be unable to spread a general conflagration through the other States. A religious sect may degenerate into a political faction in a part of the Confederacy; but the variety of sects dispersed over the entire face of it must secure the national councils against any danger from that source.
A rage for paper money, for an abolition of debts, for an equal division of property, or for any other improper or wicked project, will be less apt to pervade the whole body of the Union than a particular member of it; in the same proportion as such a malady is more likely to taint a particular county or district, than an entire State.
In the extent and proper structure of the Union, therefore, we behold a republican remedy for the diseases most incident to republican government. And according to the degree of pleasure and pride we feel in being republicans, ought to be our zeal in cherishing the spirit and supporting the character of Federalists."
Let’s begin again to rigorously apply that “republican remedy”!
V. Alexander Hamilton supporting the adoption of OCALA, in "Federalist Paper No. 85", 1788:
"The additional securities to republican government, to liberty and to property, to be derived from the adoption of the plan under consideration, consist chiefly in the restraints which the preservation of the Union will impose on local factions and insurrections, and on the ambition of powerful individuals in single States, who may acquire credit and influence enough, from leaders and favorites, to become the despots of the people; … and in the precautions against the repetition of those practices on the part of the State governments which have undermined the foundations of property and credit, have planted mutual distrust in the breasts of all classes of citizens, and have occasioned an almost universal prostration of morals."
Let’s renew and strengthen those restraints!
VI. Thomas Paine writing about the rights of posterity, in "The Rights of Man", 1791-92:
"The illuminating and divine principle of the equal rights of man, (for it has its origin from the Maker of man) relates not only to living individuals, but to generations of men succeeding each other. Every generation is equal in rights to the generations which preceded it, by the same rule that every individual is born equal in rights with his contemporary."
"Government has no right to make itself a party in any debate respecting the principles or modes of forming, or changing, constitutions. It is not for the benefit of those who exercise the powers of government, that constitutions, and the governments issuing from them, are established. In all those matters, the rights of judging and acting are in those who pay, and not in those who receive."
Let’s fully exercise the rights of those of us who pay!
VII. Thomas Paine writing about the proper origin of a constitution, in "Letter Addressed to the Addressers of the Late Proclamation", 1792:
"A Constitution is a thing antecedent to a government; it is the act of a people creating a government and giving it powers, and defining the limits and exercise of the powers so given."
Let’s maintain our vigilance and again hold our government accountable to us, the people! Let’s direct our government to exercise only those powers expressly delegated to it by OCALA. Let’s stop the federal government from acting as an unlawful substitute for our meeting our own obligations to provide others charitable assistance when they require it.
REPUDIATION OF THOSE INTERPRETATIONS OF OCALA THAT VARY WITH CIRCUMSTANCE
I. It has been argued, and unfortunately generally accepted, by the Supreme Court of the United States of America, that the Supreme Court is delegated by OCALA the power to interpret OCALA in the context of contemporary events; NOT in the context of OCALA’s own proposals and ratifications; and, NOT in the context of the Declaration of Independence which declared the principles, beliefs and causes for the establishment of our republic and OCALA, as reiterated in the preamble of OCALA. However, no where in OCALA is the Supreme Court of the United States of America delegated such power. Therefore the exercise of such power by the Supreme Court is an usurpation of such power, is a violation of OCALA, and is thereby a perpetration of a high crime.
II. The judges in the United States of America are expressly denied the power to exceed the bounds of the"the supreme Law of the Land," as written both in OCALA and in those laws made in the pursuit of the objectives of OCALA. This denial of power shall prevail regardless of whether one can find in OCALA, or in any laws of any State, that which can be interpreted or can be construed to permit otherwise.
III. Furthermore, the application of word definitions and interpretations of OCALA contrary to those applied those who proposed and those who ratified OCALA, actually constitutes amendment of OCALA in a manner other than that specified in Article V of OCALA. For that reason also, interpretation of OCALA by the Supreme Court in other contexts than those intended by applied those who proposed and those who ratified OCALA constitutes an usurpation of power, and is thereby a violation of the law, and is thereby a perpetration of a high crime.
QUOTATIONS, AND OUR INTERPRETATIONS, FROM ODOI AND OCALA
The quotations and interpretations that follow constitute our evidence that our Federal Government is not delegated by OCALA the power to change the word definitions and interpretations of OCALA from those which prevailed at the times the original federal constitution and its individual amendments were proposed and ratified. Specifically, when OCALA and its amendments were ratified, the power to transfer between people property not intended to be used by government to perform its functions, was not delegated to the federal government. Also, when OCALA and its amendments were proposed and ratified, the power to tax the same kind of objects different rates depending on the circumstances under which they have been received, held, spent, or transferred was not delegated to the federal government.
ORIGINAL QUOTATIONS FROM ODOI REGARDING OUR RIGHTS
ODOI was the Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of America, July 4, 1776.
1. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
2. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
3. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
----our interpretations
1. We individually, acting in our own perceived individual self-interest, do mutually and equally endow all innocent people with certain unalienable rights, that among these are the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
2. In order to secure these our rights, we established the government of the United States of America that derives its just powers from the consent of we who are governed.
3. In the event our government usurps powers not delegated, it is our right and duty to ourselves and to our posterity to either alter or to abolish our government, and to institute a government that does not usurp powers not delegated to it. We are not delegated by the government the power to alter or abolish our government. These powers are the powers that are ours by right of our having been born.
ORIGINAL QUOTATION FROM THE PREAMBLE TO OCALA
The Constitution of the United States of America, was ratified by all thirteen of the original states by March 4, 1789. The purpose of our Constitution was declared in its preamble.
4. (Preamble) We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
----our interpretation
4. We the people of the United States of America adopted OCALA. We adopted OCALA in order to institute a government of the United States of America whose powers are limited to those specified by OCALA. These powers are delegated for the express purpose of securing the blessings of liberty to our selves and to our posterity. OCALA helps accomplish this purpose by specifying what constitutes justice and the rule of law. Proper application of justice and the rule of law insures domestic tranquility, our effective common defense, and thereby promotes our general welfare.
ORIGINAL QUOTATION FROM OCALA DELEGATING SPECIFIC POWERS TO CONGRESS
5. (OCALA, Article I., Section 8.) The Congress shall have power
to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;
To establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures;
To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States;
To establish post offices and post roads;
To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;
To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court;
To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;
To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water;
To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;
To provide and maintain a navy;
To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;
To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;--And
To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.
----our interpretation
5. The Congress shall have the power: To do those things expressly specified in Article I., Section 8. of OCALA.
The following powers have NOT been expressly stipulated in Article I., Section 8. of OCALA or in any other place in OCALA, and, therefore, the Congress DOES NOT have the power:
To transfer property, for purposes other than those stipulated in OCALA, from those who have less to those who have more;
To transfer property, for purposes other than those stipulated in OCALA, from those who have more to those who have less; and,
To tax any object of property, including any object of money, differently depending on the circumstances under which it has been received, held, spent, or transferred.
ORIGINAL QUOTATION FROM OCALA REGARDING CITIZEN’S RIGHTS
6. (OCALA, Article IV. Section 2.) The citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states.
----our interpretation
6. Our rights consist of privileges and immunities. Privileges are what we have a right to do and have. Immunities are what we have a right to not have done to us. Each and every citizen, regardless of his state of residence has the same privileges and immunities as citizens in every state of the United States of America.
ORIGINAL QUOTATIONS FROM OCALA REGARDING THE SUPREMACY OF OCALA
7. (OCALA, Article VI) This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land;
8. (OCALA, Article VI) and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
----our interpretation
7. OCALA, and the laws of the United States of America which were made in pursuit of the purpose of OCALA; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority delegated to the United States by OCALA, shall be the "the supreme Law of the Land,".
8. The judges in the United States of America shall always be bound by the "the supreme Law of the Land," and nothing to the contrary in OCALA or in any laws of any State shall ever be interpreted or be construed to permit otherwise.
ORIGINAL QUOTATIONS FROM OCALA REGARDING POWERS AND RIGHTS NOT EXPRESSLY DELEGATED OR NOT EXPRESSLY SPECIFIED BY OCALA
9. (OCALA, Amendment IX, 1791)
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
10. (OCALA, Amendment X, 1791)
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
----our interpretation
9. Those rights enumerated in OCALA are but a portion of all the rights retained by the people. The government of the United States of America shall have the burden to prove to the people that any right it claims the people do not have is actually prohibited by OCALA.
10. Powers NOT delegated to the government of the United States of America by OCALA, NOT prohibited the government of the United States of America by OCALA, NOT prohibited the governments of and within the states by OCALA, and NOT prohibited the people by OCALA, are reserved to the people, or to the governments of or within the states, respectively. The government of the United States of America shall have the burden to prove to the people that any power it exercises is delegated to it by OCALA. The government of the United States of America shall have the burden to prove to the people that any power it claims the people or the states do not have is actually denied the people or the states by OCALA.
ORIGINAL QUOTATIONS FROM OCALA REGARDING OATHS TAKEN BY ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS
11. (OCALA, Article II, Section 1) Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
12. (OCALA, Article II., Section 4.) The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
13. (OCALA, Article VI) The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution;
----our interpretation
11. At the beginning of each term of his office, the President of the United States of America did swear (or affirm) to faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and to the best of the President’s ability, act in accord with, preserve, protect and defend OCALA.
12. The elected and appointed officials of the government of the United States shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of high crimes. An elected or appointed official commits a high crime when she or he violates her or his oath or affirmation to act in accord with, preserve, protect and defend OCALA,"the supreme Law of the Land," and shall be impeached and convicted of that high crime. When impeached and convicted, an elected or appointed official shall be removed from office.
13. The Senators and Representatives of the Congress, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States of America and of the several states, are bound by their oath or affirmation, to act in accord with, preserve, protect and defend OCALA.
ORIGINAL QUOTATION FROM OCALA REGARDING THE PROCESS OF AMENDING OCALA
14. (OCALA, Article V) proposed] Amendments ... shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, . . .
----our interpretation
14. Article V and no other article in OCALA specifies the method for amending OCALA. OCALA does not specify any other method for ratifying amendments to OCALA than the two methods specified in Article V.
OCALA can only be amended by the ratification of the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by the ratification of conventions in three fourths of the states.
Neither the legislative branch, the judicial branch or the executive branch of the government of the United States of America is delegated by OCALA the power to ratify amendments to OCALA.
ORIGINAL QUOTATION FROM OCALA REGARDING PROHIBITION OF SLAVERY AND INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE
15. (OCALA, Amendment XIII, 1865, Section 1) Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
----our interpretation
15. Except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, no person within the United States of America, or any place subject to their jurisdiction shall be compelled into that condition wherein they are an item of the tangible movable or immovable property of another. We individually possess exclusive ownership of our individual selves. We individually share our own ownership of our individual selves with no other mortal. In addition, our individual selves own that which we individually have obtained lawfully.
ORIGINAL QUOTATION FROM OCALA REGARDING THE CONDITIONS FOR A PERSON’S DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS WITHIN THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW
16. (OCALA, Amendment V, 1791) No person shall be ... deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
17. (OCALA, Amendment XIV, 1868, Section 1) No state shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
----our interpretation
16. Both the government of the United States of America and the government of any state of the United States of America shall NOT deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without the due process of law; nor shall they deprive any person of their property without just compensation.
17. The government of any state shall NOT deprive any person within its jurisdiction of life, liberty, or property without the due process of law; nor shall it deprive any person of their property without just compensation; nor shall it deprive any person of equal protection of the law.
ORIGINAL QUOTATION FROM OCALA REGARDING THE INCOME TAX
18. (OCALA, Amendment XVI, 1913) The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
----our interpretation
18. The Congress shall have power to circumvent the limitations specified in Article I. Section 9. (i.e., No capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken), while laying and collecting taxes on all incomes. However, the Congress has not been delegated by this amendment the power to abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States or deny to any person within the United States either the equal protection of the law, or just compensation for property taken for a public purpose.
The federal government shall not exercise powers not delegated to it by OCALA. Accordingly, the amount of any person’s income exempt from federal income tax shall be uniform among all persons. The federal tax on each dollar of income shall be uniform among all dollars of income not exempted. No dollar of income shall be taxed on the basis of the circumstances under which it has been received, held, spent, or transferred.
CONCLUSION
Denial of a person’s equal rights to life, to liberty, to property, to protection of the law, to due process, and to just compensation for their property taken for a public use, are a violation of OCALA and are thereby constitute a perpetration of high crimes. Those denying any of these rights shall cease and desist or resign from office.
=====================================================================
WE PROPOSE THIS AMENDMENT TO THE CONGRESS
DISCUSSION
Immediate termination of these proven high crimes shall cause suffering to those who themselves have previously been victims of these high crimes, who were forced thereby to transfer their property to others, and who are now receiving property from others who have been forced to transfer their property to them. In order to ameliorate such suffering, we recommend that Congress propose an appropriate amendment of OCALA to the States for their speedy ratification.
We recommend this amendment as a means to delegate to the Congress the power to provide for the timely, responsible, fair, and thorough disassembly of federal government programs not authorized by OCALA.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT XXVIII
Section 1. Congress shall have the power to adopt reasonable procedures for terminating by December 31, 2014, all currently existing laws and programs that violate Our Constitution As Lawfully Amended, “the supreme Law of the Land.”
Section 2. Congress shall have the power to establish voluntary programs for financing and ameliorating human suffering.
=====================================================================
“A generous parent should have said,
‘If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace’;
and this single reflection, well applied, is sufficient to awaken every man to duty.”
---Thomas Paine in “The American Crisis (1776-83)”, December, 1776.
=====================================================================
OUR REVISED LAWSUIT IS POSTED FROM:
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2003 2:42 am Post subject:
THROUGH:
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2003 3:09 am Post subject:
