37
   

Why 7 days for Creation?

 
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Aug, 2017 06:18 pm
@MontereyJack,
Louis Essen was earthbound. Satellite clocks are not. They are moving fast enough with respect to the earth for relativistic effects to show up and need to be taken iknto accountto keep earth and space clocks in synch. They've been making the needed relativistic corrections for several decades now, and it works. Sorry Cameronloon, FAIL.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Aug, 2017 06:22 pm
@cameronleon,
camloon says:
Quote:

Clocks in outer space do not slow. Clocks in outer space malfunction.


Both statements are false.
cameronleon
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 27 Aug, 2017 08:07 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Louis Essen was earthbound. Satellite clocks are not. They are moving fast enough with respect to the earth for relativistic effects to show up and need to be taken iknto accountto keep earth and space clocks in synch. They've been making the needed relativistic corrections for several decades now, and it works.


Relativistic effects? ha ha ha ha... what an idiot...

Monty, the clocks in satellites and the clocks on ground zero are both traveling around the Sun at the same speed: 19 miles per hour.

You are trying to sell tires in here... lol
cameronleon
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 27 Aug, 2017 08:09 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Both statements are false.


On the contrary, now more than ever it has been proved that there is no time dilatation:

Clocks in outer space do not slow. Clocks in outer space malfunction.


0 Replies
 
cameronleon
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 27 Aug, 2017 08:12 pm
@TomTomBinks,
Quote:

How likely is it that they ALL malfunction in exactly the same way and by an amount predicted by Relativity? Think about it for a minute.


What prediction are you talking about?

First, show that time exists physically.

Otherwise, your predictions are pure sh*t. lol
0 Replies
 
cameronleon
 
  -3  
Reply Sun 27 Aug, 2017 08:14 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
Maybe in "Christian Science" but in my field, you still must present evidence and draw a conclusion and present it. We need to know why the negative may be fact. Its like non-fiction writing, forensics cuts both ways.


You better go back to school... because you are really, really making the ridiculous with your nonsense.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Sun 27 Aug, 2017 08:33 pm
@cameronleon,
You just don't realize that farmerman is highly educated, and has a PhD. You're talking nonsense.
TomTomBinks
 
  4  
Reply Sun 27 Aug, 2017 09:09 pm
@cameronleon,
Quote:
Monty, the clocks in satellites and the clocks on ground zero are both traveling around the Sun at the same speed: 19 miles per hour.

The clock in orbit and the clock on the Earth's surface are traveling at different speeds relative to each other. Their speed around the sun doesn't matter. But I think it's more then 19mph!
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Sun 27 Aug, 2017 11:53 pm
@cameronleon,
Thirty years of experience with comparisons between satellite clocks and earthbound clocks have shown conclusively that you are ful of ****, and have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. HaHaHa on you. Kudps tp TTBinks who independently pointed out the obvious flaw in your argument. As anybody who took any physics in high school or college would.
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2017 05:14 am
@TomTomBinks,
19 miles per hour per hour is the critical acceleration rate that separates sailing vessels from motor boats.

Cameron is onto something there because he has been trying to sail fast enough so he wont fall off the edge of the planet.
0 Replies
 
cameronleon
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2017 08:25 am
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
You just don't realize that farmerman is highly educated, and has a PhD. You're talking nonsense.


PhD in his case means Physicist having Dementia.

In science there is not a single requirement to prove a negative.

Who knows where the hell he obtained his PhD
cameronleon
 
  0  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2017 08:29 am
@TomTomBinks,
Quote:
The clock in orbit and the clock on the Earth's surface are traveling at different speeds relative to each other. Their speed around the sun doesn't matter. But I think it's more then 19mph!


(an error was made when I wrote "hour" instead of "a second")

It happens that the speed of earth and the satellite, both together traveling at 19 miles per SECOND relative to the Sun: it matters a lot.

Relativity is a nonsense. Period.
0 Replies
 
cameronleon
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2017 08:32 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Thirty years of experience with comparisons between satellite clocks and earthbound clocks have shown conclusively that you are ful of ****, and have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. HaHaHa on you. Kudps tp TTBinks who independently pointed out the obvious flaw in your argument. As anybody who took any physics in high school or college would.


That is a great idea.

It is time to input in schools books of science that clocks malfunction in outer space.

A sand clock malfunction in outer space.

A water clock malfunction in outer space.

A Sun clock malfunction in outer space.

A digital clock malfunction in outer space.

An atomic clock malfunction in outer space.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2017 09:15 am
@cameronleon,
Wrong. Farmerman teaches at the graduate level.
All you're doing is resorting to ad hominem.
0 Replies
 
cameronleon
 
  0  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2017 01:50 pm
No wonder why the givers of the Nobel Prize in physics said that they were glad of not giving a Nobel Prize to retarded Einstein because his theory of relativity because this theory is not science but philosophy, and in their opinion... poor philosophy.

The satellites carrying atomic clocks travel at 5 miles per second around the earth.

Ignorant relativists say that because the clocks on ground zero "are at rest" relative to the atomic clocks in outer space, then there is a phenomenon called time dilatation due to the fast speed of satellites in reference to "standing earth" Lol

Then, we have that the atomic clocks in satellites actually travel together with "resting earth" at 19 miles per second around the Sun.

Relativists are so stupid that they never say that time dilates due to "our 19 miles per second" speed in reference to standing Sun... ha ha ha ha...

Face it guys, the theory of relativity is a complete fantasy.




cameronleon
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2017 01:54 pm
Now, when we have proved that relativity, evolution and big bang are nothing but mere imaginations of idiots, we can continue analyzing why God decided to establish the week, the 7 days.

Again, God is order, and 7 is a nice number, I also like the number 7.

I agree with God, the creator of heavens and earth that 7 days was a right choice.

(Of course I don't agree with everything that comes from God, but these 7 days are surely an acceptable choice)
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2017 04:30 pm
@cameronleon,
Quote:
we can continue analyzing why God decided to establish the week


You need to study the history of calendars. It started long before the christian religion was created.
TomTomBinks
 
  2  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2017 04:55 pm
@cameronleon,
Cam,
Your understanding of this subject is abysmal. Why don't you actually study it before you try to discredit it?
Why do you think GPS satellites have software that accounts for time dilation if it's a load of nonsense? Talk to the guys who designed the GPS. The readings must be taken using very accurate time measurements. If time dilation was not taken into account, GPS would not be accurate. It's not a matter in question. It's not a matter of debate, it's practical engineering, it's being used by billions of people all over the world.
cameronleon
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2017 07:09 pm
@TomTomBinks,
Quote:
Your understanding of this subject is abysmal. Why don't you actually study it before you try to discredit it?
Why do you think GPS satellites have software that accounts for time dilation if it's a load of nonsense?


Listen, the hardware used to update the incorrect data received from the clocks in outer space is based in trial and error observations and later calculations.

This is to say, when the clocks were sent to outer space nobody had the minimum idea of how much will be the difference between data of clocks on ground zero with clocks in outer space.

After observing the regular rate of incorrect data, a receiver with the hardware was built in order to update the data from atomic clocks in outer space.

If by any chance, you believe or think that the incorrect data from atomic clocks in outer space was already calculated in advance before sending those clocks to outer space, ha ha ha ha, then no doubt that you have been deceived... those relativists made you an idiot... ha ha ha ha...
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2017 09:45 pm
@cameronleon,
Quote:

Listen, the hardware used to update the incorrect data received from the clocks in outer space is based in trial and error observations and later calculations.


That's called research.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/11/2021 at 11:01:38