Reply
Mon 21 Jan, 2008 10:51 am
I don't remember where i heard the term but it describes me pretty accurately. Yesterday as I was laying on the sofa with the telly on I listened to various candidates and their campaign speeches/MLK speeches and quickly came to the conclusion that there is not one single candidate fit to be elected president.
Should Alfred E Neuman or Pat Paulson show up I might regain some interest but in the meantime zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
I love the term. I was going to give you credit for it.
Me too, I opened the thread to give you credit for it. Excellent.
You are a naughty guy, Dys.
Why am I not surprised that this stuff come from you?
I hear that it stems from 'premature inauguration'
very good...
maybe sometimes that leads to 'impeachment entreaty'
If you are speaking of 'termus interuptus' then you have my vote ....
Much better than 'sequential stupidity'.
Come on, if you want a real statesman vote Libertarian!
Otherwise McCain baby! He showed that he'd serve our country with every ounce of his being 40 years ago, and since then he's continually gained experience in the technical aspects of political leadership.
This lunatic has seen every side of every issue and if we want the stuff that starts legacies like JFK or Reagan then he's the man. He's the only one in this election who can administer the Ranger-Choke-Hold to the opposition!
'political bleedership'.... thanks, hanno..
I read it as "erectile", and I thought "what the hell is going on with Dys"?
That's sexist.
What's up with "oneupwomanship"?
Following on from Eclectic Liposuction.
I was going for 'clever'
Guess I 'miss'(ed) my mark...... chuckle chuckle
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace