1
   

Global Warming is a Hoax

 
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Jan, 2008 10:46 am
farmerman wrote:
hbg. The climate worldwide is warming , of that there is no doubt, Im only doubting , via additional evidence , that humans may not actually be the real cause, since the percentage effects of all our species carbon and Sulfur and Nitrogen spewing does not seem to have a really significant (or even measurable) effect.

The last major interglacial stage was not catastrophic but WAS life altering for species. Polar bears seemed to have made it alright, palm trees grew in Maine and Massachussetts (we have pollen analyses from interglacial peat deposits that are of the 116000 ybp times)

I know this is cj's post so I dont want to interfere with the spirit of healthy debate among people who obviously respect each other. I feel a lot of love in the room.


is cj sodomizing a woodland creature?
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Jan, 2008 12:34 pm
you should add "again?"
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 06:51 am
You two having fun stroking each other?

It's 14 effing degrees here (again) today.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 07:39 am
cjhsa wrote:
You two having fun stroking each other?

It's 14 effing degrees here (again) today.


What are you going to do when winter comes?

CJ should show his defiance and buy lots of shorefront property.

Joe( life on a raft can be fun)Nation
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 07:46 am
Uh, I do own lakefront property. The big lakes are WAY WAY DOWN. We have sh*tloads of beach.

If you didn't know, as most coastal dwellers don't, Michigan has more shoreline than any of the lower 48.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 07:53 am
I might also mention, Lake Michigan shoreline property runs about $10K/foot, if you are thinking of investing.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 08:17 am
No, sorry, I meant shoreline as in Florida Keys or Carolina Barrier Island.
At the place we go in Florida, the residents figure they have about twenty years before it does an Atlantis. That is, if everything isn't blown away by the ever increasing violence of the hurricane season.

Yes, many of us know that Michigan has something to be proud of, more shoreline than any of the other lower forty-eight.

Joe(No jobs, but plenty plenty shoreline.)Nation
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 08:39 am
cjhsa wrote:
The big lakes are WAY WAY DOWN.

It must be all the fish drinking the water. It couldn't possibly be something like global warming or climate change.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 09:39 am
parados wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
The big lakes are WAY WAY DOWN.

It must be all the fish drinking the water. It couldn't possibly be something like global warming or climate change.


Neither. It's the farming demands combined with some political gamesmanship. A powerful state representative owns property on Lake Michigan. The lakes cycle up and down over a 15 year period. He didn't like the fact his cottage was about to fall in the lake, and fanagled a lowering of the lake level.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 10:28 am
cjhsa wrote:
parados wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
The big lakes are WAY WAY DOWN.

It must be all the fish drinking the water. It couldn't possibly be something like global warming or climate change.


Neither. It's the farming demands combined with some political gamesmanship. A powerful state representative owns property on Lake Michigan. The lakes cycle up and down over a 15 year period. He didn't like the fact his cottage was about to fall in the lake, and fanagled a lowering of the lake level.


It's nice to see that man has no effect on his surroundings, none, nada, zilch. How could anyone possible suspect man in the changes going on? They must be complete idiots to think that.

But I am curious how a single politician lowered the lake level. Did he just open the gates on the dam at the end of the lake? Did he also get the other great lakes lowered as well so Michigan would stay low? Of course global warming is a hoax, but its "TRUE" that one man finagled the lowering of the water levels in the great lakes. All he had to do was cause the rainfall levels to decrease since 1998. Such a simple thing to do.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 10:32 am
The lakes have been low for much longer than that.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 10:37 am
My bet is this. In 20 years all of you GW types (that's funny!) are going to look back and wonder how you got duped so badly.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 12:03 pm
But wait, we need to know who this guy is who has the clout to lower the level of Lake Frigging Michigan?!

Joe(oboy)Nation
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 03:39 pm
Don't bet more than pocket change, cj. You'll lose.
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 03:45 pm
But if you own property to the waterline, just think how much richer you'll be, cj. Last I heard, the climate models predict more drought for the midwest, so you're going to get a LOT. Of course you may have to buy hiking boots to get to the water, but there are always tradeoffs.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 04:29 pm
if you want to learn what the lower lake levels have done to shipping on the GREAT LAKES have a look at the article from the detroit news - and keep in mind that the article is from 1999 - lake level has dropped even more .

Quote:
Ships carry less cargo to avoid running aground

Shallow lakes add caution, cost to commercial shippers



By Jeremy Pearce | The Detroit News

hoals and shallow waters along lake channels have become sobering obstacles for the huge ships that haul iron ore, coal, grain and other raw cargoes critical to the economies of two nations.

Great Lakes freighters are forced into "light-loading," carrying 5 percent to 8 percent less in goods to guarantee precise steering and enough buoyancy to avoid running aground.

Even with precautions, there are problems.

"Outside of Chicago this year, at Calumet Harbor, we couldn't pull into port," complained Capt. Gus Balanda, a ship's pilot who guides foreign vessels on Lakes Michigan, Huron and Superior. He has spent 46 years on the water.

"We had to partially unload outside the port, and then pull in," he said. "Do you have any idea how expensive that is?"

Lighter loads mean more trips, crew hours and fuel to carry the same amount of cargo, shippers say.

"When you light-load a 1,000-foot freighter, you can lose 5,520 tons and about $27,500 in revenue each trip, depending on the cargo," said John Greenwood, publisher of Greenwood's Guide to Great Lakes Shipping.

Greenwood's Guide is the standard source of statistics for the entire lakes shipping industry.

"That's one ship," he said. "The accumulated cost of low waters over the whole industry is finally going to be figured in the tens of millions of dollars."

Shipping industry claims are supported by federal records at the Sault Ste. Marie locks, which reflect a nearly 10-percent drop in cargo tonnage during the past year.

Iron for construction and Detroit's auto industry makes up the majority of cargo that moves on the lakes.

Ore is dug from mines west of Duluth and sent to foundries in Indiana and other southern ports. Iron-ore pellets, called taconite, made up 56 percent of all cargo entering the locks in 1998.

"We've grown used to high waters. Now we're eating the loss and there's not much we can do about it," said Stuart Theis, president of Oglebay Norton Co.'s marine services division in Cleveland.




full article :
LAKERS LOWER FREIGHT LOADS

and a more up-to-date article from april 2007 :

LOWER LAKE LEVELS
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 05:27 pm
Apparently NASA is in on the hoax....


Antarctic Ice Loss Speeds Up
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 05:55 pm
Doesn't that guy who cj says lowered the lake owe a lot of money to the shippers??

Joe(What's the guy's name???)Nation
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 01:08 pm
just coming back from a walk along eastern lake ontario .
the water level is quite low - even though the locks are now closed for the winter - no ships oming through the eisenhower-locks .
there is just a thin crust of ice on the lake - not thick enough for skating or playing ice hockey .
perhaps global COOLING can be blamed for the freeze-up occuring later and later during the last 10 - 15 years . :wink:
hbg
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jan, 2008 08:26 am
Uh, what the heck does the last 10-15 years prove about ANYTHING?

Except that maybe we have elected a lot of idiots to office?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.3 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 08:33:47