Hilary

Perhaps you mean Hillary. I doubt she is yet. She has enough name rec to survive a few early losses.

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Perhaps you mean Hillary. I doubt she is yet. She has enough name rec to survive a few early losses.

Cycloptichorn

She won't be the center of the media's attention anymore. This will likely hurt more than a 3rd place showing.

0 Replies

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Perhaps you mean Hillary. I doubt she is yet. She has enough name rec to survive a few early losses.

Cycloptichorn

It's early, I know, but connecting Clinton with the words "LOSER" and TOTAL REJECTION is a wonderful thought.

0 Replies

Senator Clinton already was not the center of media attention. Oprah's support of Obama had already removed the spotlight from Clinton. Nevertheless, Clinton still likely remains the most "electable" Democrat. It's early yet--Obama and Edwards can do well in primaries down the road. I doubt that Edwards has a shot in the long run for the nomination--he might have a shot at a vice-presidential nod, especially if Obama wins the nomination.

0 Replies

The choice between the two leading Democratic candidates is really between favoring the vast amount one doesn't know about Obama over the vast amount one should know about Clinton but which too many ignore.
It is a choice between a guess and the gross, the unknown hustler and the known perp, the blank page over an overflowing, disingenuous and dishonorable record.

Mae West said that when faced with the choice between two evils, she always picked the one she hadn't tried before.
This is clearly a strong argument for Obama, but fortunately we still have another choice left:
John Edwards, whose proposals are the most progressive of the lot and whose supporters include those among the most active in pushing for real change and not just gossamer clouds of undefined hope.

Even if Edwards can't win the election, he will definitely win the argument because an America that succeeds will adopt his approach and one that fails will be sorry it hadn't.
A fantasized future or a falsified past won't save America:
real progress for real people just might.
http://emporium.turnpike.net/P/ProRev/#new

0 Replies

Ramafuchs wrote:

The choice between the two leading Democratic candidates is really between favoring the vast amount one doesn't know about Obama over the vast amount one should know about Clinton but which too many ignore. It is a choice between a guess and the gross, the unknown hustler and the known perp, the blank page over an overflowing, disingenuous and dishonorable record.

You are completely full of it. Obama has plenty on his record as a rep in state government and as a senator. Likewise, most of the "sins" you paint Clinton with are figments of the collective imagination of the rabid right. Most of those are things attributed to her husband that blacken her by extension. One person on here said she was mean to her husband to explain his dislike. To call Obama a hustler and Clinton's record disingenuous and dishonorable shows a complete disregard for the facts and a willingness to liable that I haven't seen you display before.

0 Replies

Are you qualified Ms clinton?( yes with money)
Don't you think that you make a drama?( yes( Americans are half baked potatoes)
My name is Rama Fuchs.
We the global people( read non-Americans) are fed up with your intellectual country.

0 Replies

Ramafuchs wrote:

Are you qualified Ms clinton?( yes with money)
Don't you think that you make a drama?( yes( Americans are half baked potatoes)
My name is Rama Fuchs.
We the global people( read non-Americans) are fed up with your intellectual country.

I'm not sure what an "intellectual country" is, but apparently you feel that there are no people in the US qualified to be the President you want. Still, what you posted above is straight out liable.

0 Replies

Or libel. Either one.

0 Replies

Eng
"To call Obama a hustler and Clinton's record disingenuous and dishonorable shows a complete disregard for the facts and a willingness to liable that I haven't seen you display before."
It is too early to come out.
Await for the inevitable hour.
Accept my thanks in advance.
Rama

0 Replies

Ramafuchs wrote:

Eng
"To call Obama a hustler and Clinton's record disingenuous and dishonorable shows a complete disregard for the facts and a willingness to liable that I haven't seen you display before."
It is too early to come out.
Await for the inevitable hour.
Accept my thanks in advance.
Rama

Legally speaking, the truth is always sufficient defense against any allegation of libel.

0 Replies

of course
FlaJa
Am i wrong to expose the legal intricacies?

0 Replies

Ramafuchs wrote:

of course
FlaJa
Am i wrong to expose the legal intricacies?

If Obama is a hustler and Clinton's record is disingenuous and dishonorable, then it isn't libelous to say so.

Hilary

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know