map wrote-
Quote:I guess that could be said about all rape cases then huh spendius?
"She shouldn't have been wearing revealing clothing."
"She shouldn't have been on a date with that guy."
"She shouldn't have been walking home."
"She shouldn't have had such large breasts."
"She shouldn't have blond hair."
"She shouldn't have...."
You have over egged your pudding map. Do you not understand why I quoted that pilot?
A young woman in that milieux knows that all eyes are upon her. If she unbuttons a button or two and puts herself about unchaperoned in a semi-lawless setting and doesn't think she is risking that happening to her she should have been weeded out in the recruitment process for stupidity.
Judges here make allowance in sentencing rapists for the provocation the victim showed. And so do the cops in their investigations. It's nothing new. Trying going into court on a woman's allegations and defence lawyers keen to rip her testimony to shreds with your legal reputation at stake.
A Christian would never rape any woman.
To suggest I was justifying rape is ridiculous. I was merely explaining how Commanders-in-Chief take it as a part of the war situation and have more important things on their minds. That's what the thread is about not the "alleged" rape. It's in War and Peace. And Tolstoy was a Christian of sorts.
Like I said--get real. Enough of this cosy "folks back home" sanctimony.
She shouldn't have been there in the first place. Only complete idiots would put women in such situations.