0
   

DEATH WISH MOVIE: Good or Bad Filosofy ?

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jan, 2008 09:02 pm
Endymion wrote:


i think kids should be protected from adult fantasy and 'make believe' as much as possible.

Thay have as much right to be informed as u do.



Quote:
The Death Wish films are the real insult to intelligence.

How ?
What insult ?



Quote:
Certificate 18 - and for good reason.

For protection.

What the hell does THAT mean ?
If someone steals your car ( or any other property )
and says that it s for your protection,
does that make OK ?

I don 't think so.





Quote:
Apart from the graphic rape scene in death wish II
(which i would consider child abuse to show a kid) -
revenge is a mug's game.

What does THAT mean ?
What is a mug ?

Everyone must decide for himself whether to execute revenge
and chance the consequences.







Quote:
A perversely negative Ouroboros,
destroying itself by becoming the very thing it set out initially to defeat.

Bronson never became what he set out to defeat.
He defeated what he sought out
( for a limited time, until the police ran him out of town; then he took up the same elsewhere ).







Quote:
Maybe some parents want more for their kids than miss-placed hero worship

The kids and everyone else,
of every age, are all free to believe whatever thay opt to believe,
and to worship whatever or whoever thay choose.
Everyone of any age is sovereign n autonomous between the ears.







Quote:
combined with self righteousness that deceives the weak
into thinking they can get away with murder/playing god.

WhatayaMEAN " deceives " ??
Have u proof that it cant happen ?

It was not murder.
He was ready to defend himself
( and in so doing, the REST of us, too ).
He was much more valuable to public safety than the police were.

If that happened in real life, I 'd CHEER.

He put the police to shame, by comparison.
He was a better deterent to violent criminals than thay were.
The criminals who Bronson had interred, were deterred PERMANENTLY.







Quote:
That they have the right to inflict their suffering onto others.

Yes; the right of revenge; of getting even.
There 's nothing rong with that.





Quote:
Anyway, the central character is a fake

It was not presented as having been a true story.
Many movies are not.





Quote:
If he'd really had a death wish
he would have stuck the gun in his own mouth and blown his own brains out.

Any chance that the wish for death
was against the bad guys

( like the ones who attacked his wife n child )
and that he carried out his wish ?





Quote:
The man was having a paddy.

What the hell 's a paddy ?




Quote:
He was out of control.

Under whose CONTROL do u want him to BE ?




Quote:
A police marksman would have brought him down for sure, in reality.

Nonsense.
He had no snipers aiming at him
,
nor did he do anything rong.

He defended himself from violent depredations,
after enticing them, killing many violent criminals
and serving a very valuable purpose for the rest of us.
If the story were TRUE, then I 'd be very grateful to him.

He 'd have been much more valuable than most politicians.








Quote:
He went on a killing spree to distract himself from the painful reality.

Yes; he DID have fun with it,
but in the execution thereof, he made society much safer
for the rest of us
. If it had been true,
how many violent felonies wud have been prevented
by the criminals being too dead to commit them ????????????





Quote:
He became what he despised rather than face his own grief.

Nonsense.
He did NOT become what he despised,
because he did not kill innocent, decent people.

Each of those criminals was a DANGER;
he extinguished those dangers.



Quote:
What a baby.

U thought he was too young ?
Well, maybe, but he made up for youth by his bravery.







Quote:
If he'd really loved the victims whose deaths are flaunted as an excuse,

U accuse him of hypocrisy ?
I do not remember him alleging that he loved anyone.
He merely acted upon his beliefs
( more than most folks do ).






Quote:
he would have honored them
by protecting others from similar violent death - not by dishing out more of it.

That is a really STUPID thing to say
( which is the reason that Edgar agrees with u )
that if Bronson loved,
then he wud AGREE with your cowardice.

Incidentally, " protecting others from similar violent death "
is absolutely impossible.




Quote:
I think it takes a brave man to feel the pain of injustice and deal with it inside
Endy

( Lemme get this straight: u think that if a man is NOT brave,
then it is IMPOSSIBLE for him to feel the pain of injustice ??
Therefore, cowards are immune to the pain of injustice ?
If the pain of injustice is inflicted upon a coward
[e.g., if someone unjustly slices off one of a coward 's ears] he will be unable to feel it ? )

Our hero, Bronson dealt with it
inside and outside.


Your post is very poorly reasoned, Endy.
David
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 02:42 am
I'm speechless
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 02:51 am
Endymion wrote:
I'm speechless

That 's just as well.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 03:04 am
I own that movie.

While u are busy being speechless,
it will look good on my High Definition TV.
David
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 03:14 am
Yippee-kay-yay!

and all that
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 03:21 am
God, i need a good day's sleep
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 05:29 am
Pleasant dreams.

Don 't dream of Bronson.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 05:47 am
You are by all indications a sick f*ck who is completely oblivious to his own affliction.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 08:20 am
How is this scenario?

Individually, thirty or forty would be Bronson type deathwishers, instead of finding criminals to entice and blow away, mistake one another for criminals. By the time the National Guard shows up they are in the latter stages of the kind of battle that would make George Bush proud.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 09:22 am
Ah, we can dream edgar....
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 04:35 pm
snood wrote:
You are by all indications a sick f*ck who is completely oblivious to his own affliction.

I might as well say the same of u.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 04:42 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
How is this scenario?

Individually, thirty or forty would be Bronson type deathwishers,
instead of finding criminals to entice and blow away,
mistake one another for criminals. By the time the National Guard shows
up they are in the latter stages of the kind of battle that would make George Bush proud.

No.
That does not make sense,
because Bronson ONLY counterattacked,
after he had been attacked in the first place.

Therefore, the Bronson type deathwishers
wud remain quiet, tranquil, and peaceful in one another 's company.





U tried to get away with
the Fallacy of the Stolen Premise.
It did not work.





David
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 04:48 pm
If you get that many lunatics out there, it can happen. Most persons do not have script writers to choreograph it for them. To think there would be no extra "nudging" by many of them would be wishful thinking.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 05:33 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
If you get that many lunatics out there,
it can happen. Most persons do not have script writers to choreograph it for them.


To think there would be no extra "nudging" by many of them would be wishful thinking.

( U have EVIDENCE of this ?? )

Altho Bronson was upset over the rape/murder
of his family, it is not fair to the hero of the movie
to characterize him as a lunatic.

He did not act in a chaotic nor disorganized fashion.

He was calm and peaceful,
in flashing cash in bad neighborhoods,
and he passively allowed the future to evolve in his presence, as it wud
;
i.e., the predatory criminals aggressively attacked,
and he defeated them with counteraggression that thay had not anticipated,
in that thay thought that their PARTNER, government,
had made their job SAFE for them ( like O.S.H.A. ) by intimidating the future victims
into remaining helpless n defenseless.

In states that have no gun laws,
Vermont and Alaska,
there has been no turbulent conduct;
( tho, in fairness, thay have not had " deathwishers " on the prowl ).

David
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 05:50 pm
It is human nature to get a little extra action in such situations. That is part of the reason why vigilante action is illegal. To think owning a weapon and going out to shoot criminals confers on the vigilante some sort of greater moral character is just plain wrong.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 05:50 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
How is this scenario?

Individually, thirty or forty would be Bronson type deathwishers

That is an interesting thought experiment:
what effects wud result on crime,
if 40 deathwishers flashed cash,
in front of criminal types,
precipitating confrontations that accelerated
the bad guys' demises ?

As the word got around in the criminal community,
how fast wud crime PLUMMET ?


Wud there be a mass migration of violent criminals
to healthier climes, with fewer deathwishers ?

How many violent felonies wud NOT be committed,
because either:
the career criminals were too scared,
or too dead to continue their respective predatory crime sprees ?

In time, there 'd be severe problems among the police
whose services were less required than before
( and a good incentive for them to get rid of the deathwishers ).
Maybe the Fire Dept. wud need them ?

David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 06:02 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
It is human nature to get a little extra action in such situations.
That is part of the reason why vigilante action is illegal.
To think owning a weapon and going out to shoot criminals confers on the
vigilante some sort of greater moral character is just plain wrong.

I don 't think u r being fair, Ed.

U r failing to consider how many good, innocent, decent people
will be saved from a cruel fate, by elimination of the predators, beforehand.

Consider it THIS WAY, if u will:
suppose that someone dear to u, fell victim
to criminal predators.

Suppose further that by a miracle,
u cud turn back time and have a deathwisher
wipe out the said criminal predators ( as Bronson did ), before thay fell upon your loved one.

Wud u accept that opportunity
or
reject it ?

For my part, let me be clear that I 'd accept it
with no second thoughts.


David
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 06:09 pm
You are idealizing the situation. You have to realize that many who would take advantage of that scenario would be out to blast as many criminals as possible, leading to such errors as mistaking the motives and actions of suspected criminals. Less criminals is an admirable goal, but conducting a shooting gallery and not affording a legal system would result in chaos.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 06:32 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
You are idealizing the situation.
You have to realize that many who would take advantage of that scenario
would be out to blast as many criminals as possible,
leading to such errors as mistaking the motives and actions of suspected criminals.
Less criminals is an admirable goal, but conducting a shooting gallery
and not affording a legal system would result in chaos.

If someone is beating upon u with a tire iron, or plunging a knife into u,
that is not the occasion for civil nor criminal litigation; not yet.
In such circumstance,
u need not worry about mistaking him for a criminal.



I agree that everyone shud be as peaceful and quiet as Bronson was,
if no one is becoming violent.

The only question arises within a DEFENSIVE context.

Are u willing to tell us whether u 'd accept or reject
a retroactive opportunity to have Bronson type deathwishers
take out a criminal who 'd attack someone dear to your love,
if that were possible ?


I 've already given MY answer.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jan, 2008 07:21 pm
In an idealized situation, a man who steps up and saves your loved one is great. In actual life, it rarely happens the way of the movie writers.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 11:34:16