1
   

Lawyers demand Bush hearings

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
blueflame1
 
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 06:46 pm
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 534 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 07:02 pm
Who knew there were a thousand leftist Bush-hating lawyers in America?

Course they might not all be lawyers ... any non-lawyer could follow the link and sign up: LINK

Go for it, BF.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 07:12 pm
Ticomaya, of course go for it. The Mass Murderer in Chief should face a judgement day.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 07:53 pm
No, you go for it, BF.

BTW ... a real lawyer would spell "judgment" without the second "e."

Wouldn't want you to make any mistakes while you're masquerading as a lawyer.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 11:04 pm
Quote:
BTW ... a real lawyer would spell "judgment" without the second "e."


Judgemnt. Thanks, real lawyer.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 11:51 pm
blatham wrote:
Quote:
BTW ... a real lawyer would spell "judgment" without the second "e."


Judgemnt. Thanks, real lawyer.


I knew someone wouldn't be able to figure it out ... but I didn't figure you for the stooge, Bernie.
0 Replies
 
Jim
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Dec, 2007 10:39 am
Hmmmm. Lawyers make $500+ an hour.

Of course they're demanding a hearing.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Dec, 2007 11:18 am
Ticomaya wrote:
blatham wrote:
Quote:
BTW ... a real lawyer would spell "judgment" without the second "e."


Judgemnt. Thanks, real lawyer.


I knew someone wouldn't be able to figure it out ... but I didn't figure you for the stooge, Bernie.


I'm the fourth...Burney. What did I miss? Where you in the US appear to skip the first 'e', it's common, even more proper, in Canadian or Briteese to include it.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Dec, 2007 04:54 pm
Ticomaya, my spelling typo aint gonna wash away Bushie's crimes against humanity which you support with great complicity.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Dec, 2007 07:29 am
So actually, these lawyers are complaining about the Democratic Congress.

They are right to criticize the Democratic controlled Congress. However, where were they 7 years ago when Bush got us involved in this mess?
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Dec, 2007 07:58 am
blatham wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
blatham wrote:
Quote:
BTW ... a real lawyer would spell "judgment" without the second "e."


Judgemnt. Thanks, real lawyer.


I knew someone wouldn't be able to figure it out ... but I didn't figure you for the stooge, Bernie.


I'm the fourth...Burney. What did I miss? Where you in the US appear to skip the first 'e', it's common, even more proper, in Canadian or Briteese to include it.


Yes, judgement is the correct spelling.

Smile
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Lawyers demand Bush hearings
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/15/2024 at 11:11:37
▲ ▼