1
   

Military Evangelism Deeper, Wider Than First Thought

 
 
Reply Fri 21 Dec, 2007 07:30 pm
By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report

Friday 21 December 2007

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation says the two photos show how the infiltration of fundamentalist Christianity in the US military is starting to mirror Islamic fundamentalism.

For US Army soldiers entering basic training at Fort Jackson Army base in Columbia, South Carolina, accepting Jesus Christ as their personal savior appears to be as much a part of the nine-week regimen as the vigorous physical and mental exercises the troops must endure.

That's the message directed at Fort Jackson soldiers, some of whom appear in photographs in government issued fatigues, holding rifles in one hand, and Bibles in their other hand.

Frank Bussey, director of Military Ministry at Fort Jackson, has been telling soldiers at Fort Jackson that "government authorities, police and the military = God's Ministers,"

Bussey's teachings from the "God's Basic Training" Bible study guide he authored says US troops have "two primary responsibilities": "to praise those who do right" and "to punish those who do evil - "God's servant, an angel of wrath." Bussey's teachings directed at Fort Jackson soldiers were housed on the Military Ministry at Fort Jackson web site. Late Wednesday, the web site was taken down without explanation. Bussey did not return calls for comment. The web site text, however, can still be viewed in an archived format.

The Christian right has been successful in spreading its fundamentalist agenda at US military installations around the world for decades. But the movement's meteoric rise in the US military came in large part after 9/11 and immediately after the US invaded Iraq in March of 2003. At a time when the United States is encouraging greater religious freedom in Muslim nations, soldiers on the battlefield have told disturbing stories of being force-fed fundamentalist Christianity by highly controversial, apocalyptic "End Times" evangelists, who have infiltrated US military installations throughout the world with the blessing of high-level officials at the Pentagon. Proselytizing among military personnel has been conducted openly, in violation of the basic tenets of the United States Constitution.

Perhaps no other fundamentalist Christian group is more influential than Military Ministry, a national organization and a subsidiary of the controversial fundamentalist Christian organization Campus Crusade for Christ. Military Ministry's national web site boasts it has successfully "targeted" basic training installations, or "gateways," and has successfully converted thousands of soldiers to evangelical Christianity.

Military Ministry says its staffers are responsible for "working with Chaplains and Military personnel to bring lost soldiers closer to Christ, build them in their faith and send them out into the world as Government paid missionaries" - which appears to be a clear-cut violation of federal law governing the separation of church and state.

"Young recruits are under great pressure as they enter the military at their initial training gateways," the group has stated on its web site. "The demands of drill instructors push recruits and new cadets to the edge. This is why they are most open to the 'good news.' We target specific locations, like Lackland AFB [Air Force base] and Fort Jackson, where large numbers of military members transition early in their career. These sites are excellent locations to pursue our strategic goals."

Mikey Weinstein, the founder and president of the government watchdog organization the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, whose group has been closely tracking Military Ministry's activities at Fort Jackson and other military bases around the country, said in an interview that using "the machinery of the state" to promote any form of religion is "not only unconstitutional and un-American but it also creates a national security threat of the first order."

A six-month investigation by MRFF has found Military Ministry's staff has successfully targeted US soldiers entering basic training at Lackland Air Force Base and Fort Sam Houston, with the approval of the Army base's top commanders.

"I've said it before and I will say it again," Weinstein said. "We are in the process of creating a fundamentalist Christian Taliban and somebody has to do something to stop it now."

Weinstein points out that on Fort Jackson's Military Ministry web site, the basic training battalion commander, Lt. Col. David Snodgrass, and the battalion's chaplain, Maj. Scott Bullock, who appear in uniform in a photograph with Bussey, is a clear-cut violation of Military rules. MRFF contacted Bussey via email on Wednesday to request information about the "similar programs" he claimed Fort Jackson has for soldiers of other faiths. Bussey, responding to MRFF via email, did not provide an answer to the watchdog group's question, but, instead, he fired back a query of his own asking MRFF Senior Research Director Chris Rodda to direct him to the place in the Constitution where it states there is a "separation of church and state."

A spokesperson for the Fort Jackson Army base did not return calls for comment. Earlier this week, after MRFF exposed the potential constitutional violations between Military Ministry and the Fort Jackson Army base, Bussey added language to Military Ministry at Fort Jackson web site in the form of a "notice to MRFF and ACLU types" in bold red letters that says the Bible study classes are strictly voluntary, not command directed in any way, allows soldiers to exercise for themselves the right of freedom of religion ... and similar programs exist on Fort Jackson for Soldiers of all faiths."

Clause 3, Article VI of the Constitution forbids a religion test for any position in the federal government, and the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights says Congress shall make no law regarding an establishment of religion.

In July, the Pentagon's inspector general (IG) responded to a complaint filed a year earlier by MRFF that accused Pentagon officials of violating the federal law governing the separation of church and state. The IG did not address the church/state issue, but he issued a 45-page report admonishing several high-level Pentagon officials for participating, while in uniform and on active duty, in a promotional video sponsored by Campus Crusade for Christ's Christian Embassy group. The IG report quoted one high-ranking military official as saying he believed his participation in the video was acceptable because Campus Crusade for Christ had become so embedded in the Pentagon's day-to-day operations that he viewed the organization as a "quasi federal entity."

The IG report recommended the military officials who appeared in the video be disciplined, but the Pentagon would not say whether it has in fact punished the military officers who appeared in the video.

MRFF uncovered another recent Campus Crusade for Christ promotional video filmed at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs that would appear to violate the same military rules detailed in the IG report. Cadets and academy officials appear in uniform discussing how Campus Crusade for Christ helped strengthen their bonds with Jesus.

Scot Blom, the Campus Crusade for Christ director assigned to work at the Air Force Academy, says in the video the organization "has always been very intentional about going after the leaders or the future leaders" and that's why Campus Crusade for Christ picked the Air Force Academy to spread its fundamentalist Christian message. Every week, according to the video, cadets are encouraged to participate in a Bible study class called "cru" short for "crusade."

"Our purpose for Campus Crusade for Christ at the Air Force Academy is to make Jesus Christ the issue at the Air Force Academy and around the world," Blom says in the video. "They're government paid missionaries when they leave here."

Weinstein said the recent promotional video for Campus Crusade for Christ, and the photograph of US soldiers holding Bibles in one hand and rifles in the other posted on the Fort Jackson Military Ministry web site, gives the impression the Pentagon endorses the fundamentalist Christian organization and underscores that the occupation of Iraq and the war in Afghanistan appears to be more of a modern-day fundamentalist Christian crusade. That message, Weinstein said, could lead to more "jihads" against the United States.

Indeed. Weinstein, a former White House counsel during the Reagan administration, former general counsel to Texas billionaire and two-time presidential candidate H. Ross Perot and a former Air Force Judge Advocate General, said he had an "unexpected" telephone conversation with several senior Bush administration intelligence officials this week who encouraged him "to continue to fight for the separation of church and state in the US military" because, these senior administration intelligence officials told Weinstein, US troops are being put in harms way.

Weinstein said the senior administration intelligence officials told him they too have been tracking Islamic web sites where people have been discussing on message boards the fundamental Christianity issues Weinstein has raised within the US military. The intelligence officials told Weinstein they are concerned the fundamentalist Christian agenda surfacing in the military could lead to attacks against US soldiers. Weinstein said he could not identify the senior Bush intelligence administration officials he spoke with because they contacted him with the understanding they would not be named.

Fundamental Christianity's Influence on the Bush Administration
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/122107J.shtml
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,393 • Replies: 32
No top replies

 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 07:52 am
Evangelical video shows cadets pressured to be missionaries by Katie Baker
Published: Friday December 21, 2007

A video made by Campus Crusade for Christ, a Christian ministry group, shows Air Force Academy cadets being pressured to participate in religious activities and become "government paid missionaries when they leave."

Mikey Weinstein, president of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), which released the video this week, says the video is "absolutely out of control."

"You cannot engage the U.S. government to propel your religion," said Weinstein.

The video, filmed in the summer of 2002, opens with tranquil shots of "Colorado's most frequently visited man-made attraction." The unnamed narrator describes the chapel in detail, which "resembles a formation of fighter jets shooting into the sky."

While the narrator says that students receive a "well-rounded education" at the Academy, the video focuses mainly on how stressful the environment is and not so subtly suggests that cadets can find solace in religion.

"I do a lot of counseling ... like any other college campus, there are a variety of needs that arise... spiritually and emotionally," says Major John Dider, who "considers himself a chaplain first."

"Our purpose for Campus Crusade for Christ at the Air Force Academy is to make Jesus Christ the issue at the Air Force Academy and around the world," says Scott Blum, the former Academy Campus Crusade for Christ director, who had no previous military experience but -- according to the video -- always "knew that God called him to invest in the lives of military men and women."

As a Church choir sings in the background, the video's narrator asserts that "each year, cadets are recognizing God's call which will make an impact in the present ... and for eternity."

Weinstein says the video is only one item on a "long menu" of unconstitutional evangelism going on in the military. The MRFF compiled a six month investigative report in 2007 on the Christian group, focusing on the group's Fort Jackson "God Basic Training" that they allege teaches the recruits that "when you join the military, you've really joined the ministry."

An Air Force Academy spokesman, who said he has not seen the video, said the Air Force Academy has pledged to defend religious rights.

"We've worked actively to remind our people to respect others, and we make sure we offer a wide variety of [religious] services," the spokesman said.

This video is from Global Pastors Network, filmed in the summer of 2002.
link
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Dec, 2007 08:36 am
BM
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 09:21 am
This is bad? I believe, this is good. This country needs people that are motivated to deal with the 21st century brand of radical enemy. Perhaps religion maintains this needed motivation, rather than a secular orientation of, "why can't we all live together in peace? Coom-bah-ya"

Military installations always had Chaplains. Usually a Catholic Chaplain and a Protestant Chaplain. What's wrong with enriching the religious awareness in the military?

Would we be surprised if there were rabbis on Israeli military installations that tried to get secular Israelies to be more religious? I think that wouldn't raise many eyebrows. So, this being a very Christian country (a country with many Christian citizens), what's wrong with giving U.S. soldiers more of their ancestral faith?

Is there concern that these ministries are proselytizing to non-Christians? That's not how I read these posts. It is just getting soldiers with a Christain background to feel closer to their faith. What's wrong with that?

If the U.S. was comprised of all fundamentalist Moslems, would we have a war on terror? No we wouldn't. We'd already be friendly territory, so to speak.

I'm saying that our enemies are our enemies specifically because we are who we are. Yet, we want to ignore who our enemies see us as?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 10:10 am
Foofie
What is wrong with it you ask? What's wrong with turning the US armed forces into a hot bed of Christian fundamentalism? The same thing that's wrong with religious fundamentalism no matter the religion. In the long run there is very little difference between the aims of Islamic and Christian fundamentalists. I would also add it is unconstitutional {Separation of church and state}
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 10:18 am
historyrepeats
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 11:15 am
Foofie wrote:
This is bad? I believe, this is good. This country needs people that are motivated to deal with the 21st century brand of radical enemy. Perhaps religion maintains this needed motivation, rather than a secular orientation of, "why can't we all live together in peace? Coom-bah-ya"

Military installations always had Chaplains. Usually a Catholic Chaplain and a Protestant Chaplain. What's wrong with enriching the religious awareness in the military?

Would we be surprised if there were rabbis on Israeli military installations that tried to get secular Israelies to be more religious? I think that wouldn't raise many eyebrows. So, this being a very Christian country (a country with many Christian citizens), what's wrong with giving U.S. soldiers more of their ancestral faith?

Is there concern that these ministries are proselytizing to non-Christians? That's not how I read these posts. It is just getting soldiers with a Christain background to feel closer to their faith. What's wrong with that?

If the U.S. was comprised of all fundamentalist Moslems, would we have a war on terror? No we wouldn't. We'd already be friendly territory, so to speak.

I'm saying that our enemies are our enemies specifically because we are who we are. Yet, we want to ignore who our enemies see us as?


The hypocrisy of the so called religious fundamentalists OF ANY RELIGION to align themselves with any military is laughable.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 11:26 am
The Aim of religious fundamentalism. Today the government , tomorrow the world.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 11:44 am
au1929 wrote:
The Aim of religious fundamentalism. Today the government , tomorrow the world.


Agree. And each and every person who supports them are enemies to the US Constitution and must be silenced.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 07:36 pm
woiyo wrote:
au1929 wrote:
The Aim of religious fundamentalism. Today the government , tomorrow the world.


Agree. And each and every person who supports them are enemies to the US Constitution and must be silenced.


I thought the quote was, "Today the Sudetenland, tomorrow the world."

Regardless, I thought the Constitution gives us freedom of speech.

Also, since no one on this thread is saying they have first hand experience as to what constitutes this brand of Christianity being proselytized, then why claim it is some form of fundamentalism?

I believe many people that are either agnostic/atheist, or some "Christmas and Easter only" adherent to Christianity feel that any deeper feelings to that faith reflects fundamentalism. In effect, in their secularism they are acting like fundamentalists, since they would like to minimize the outspoken beliefs of those of a greater religious bent.

It's interesting, I believe, that today Christianity is attacked not just by radical Fundamentalists, but also by those of a Christian ancestry, because Christianity doesn't approve of their lifestyle(s). I don't believe everyone is intellectually honest when it comes to the real reasons (aka ulterior motives) for one's positions.

But again, there is no reason to believe that any sort of fundamentalism is being proselytized in the military. It just may seem that way from the perspective of the watered down Christianity that exists today amongst so many people that got baptized in their youth or infancy.

By the way, in history it did occur that a warrior class was one religion, while the peasants were another religion. Vietnam comes to mind; the military were Catholic; the peasants were Buddhist. Also the military class of the Khazars became Jewish (supposedly) in the Middle Ages, so as not to be taxed by Rome or the Caliphate, while the masses were still pagan.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 07:47 pm
woiyo wrote:
au1929 wrote:
The Aim of religious fundamentalism. Today the government , tomorrow the world.


Agree. And each and every person who supports them are enemies to the US Constitution and must be silenced.


You mean all the Christian Fundamentalists that number in the tens of millions, in this country, are enemies to the U.S. Constitution?
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 12:12 am
Foofie
To a christian fundamentalist the constitution dosent mean poop. The most important teachings come from the bible. They are at least as dangerous as muslims.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 01:46 am
Foofie wrote:
This is bad? I believe, this is good. This country needs people that are motivated to deal with the 21st century brand of radical enemy. Perhaps religion maintains this needed motivation, rather than a secular orientation of, "why can't we all live together in peace? Coom-bah-ya"

This is bad. It puts the wrong emphasis on who the enemy is and who the ally is. If you are trained to be a Christian troop, it blurs the distinction between the radical muslim and the moderate muslim. It gives credibility to this being a holy war, and validates many of the radical claims of the 21st century brand of radical enemy.

If you're a muslim in one of the countries that were currently attacking, what do you want assiciated with our presence: The "Americans are here," or the "Christians are here." If you want them to actively believe that Christianity is a threat to their way of life, then the Christians are dropping bombs.

Foofie wrote:
Military installations always had Chaplains. Usually a Catholic Chaplain and a Protestant Chaplain. What's wrong with enriching the religious awareness in the military?


My Grandfather worked under a catholic Chaplain in WW2. There was a protestant Chaplain as well but he had to leave due to illness. My grandfather was a japanese interpreter and was his second in command. The chaplian knew that his job was not to spread the word of god but to provide spiritual guidance.

There's a difference.

After the war was over, my grandfather was with the Chaplain in the prisons with the japanese generals yet to face millitary trial. The Chaplain and my grandfather spent a great deal of time to make sure that the japanese prisioners that were buddhists and shintoists were able to recieve council/services from monks etc. so they would go into Tokyo and find the monks to come and visit the prison. Additionally, the Chaplain, made sure to tend to other needs such as the prisoners diet and making sure they were offered food which was not in violation of their beliefs.

I think what this Chaplain did was very dignified and it shows that their (Chaplain's) purpose can have meaning without trying to teach the bible or spread Christianity. Many of the people in the prison were executed for war crimes, this included General Tojo. The Chaplain worked very hard to make sure that last rights and burial wishes were honored as the prisoner requested.

I think of this, and then I think today, and it disguests me.

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 07:28 am
Foofie wrote:
woiyo wrote:
au1929 wrote:
The Aim of religious fundamentalism. Today the government , tomorrow the world.


Agree. And each and every person who supports them are enemies to the US Constitution and must be silenced.


You mean all the Christian Fundamentalists that number in the tens of millions, in this country, are enemies to the U.S. Constitution?


Yes. Keep your religion out of the "public square".
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 08:27 am
rabel22 wrote:
Foofie
To a christian fundamentalist the constitution dosent mean poop. The most important teachings come from the bible. They are at least as dangerous as muslims.


Care to support your position with facts showing the relative numbers of Christian fundamentalists blowing up thousands of innocent victims on a regular basis .... as compared to Muslim fundamentalists? Muslim extremists are guided to Jihad by the Quran, and have a propensity to strap on nail bombs and blow themselves up in crowded cafes and buses in an effort to find their 77 virgins. Christian extremists -- guided by the Bible -- don't tend to do that ... unless you have some facts that indicate otherwise?
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 02:24 pm
How about Bush and company blowing up Iraqi people on his trumped up weapons of mass destruction crap. After all isn't Bush the ultimate christian fundamentalist who talks to God and is answered. As such you can see he has no respect for the constitution by the way he bends it to his own beliefs.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 02:42 pm
rabel22 wrote:
How about Bush and company blowing up Iraqi people on his trumped up weapons of mass destruction crap. After all isn't Bush the ultimate christian fundamentalist who talks to God and is answered. As such you can see he has no respect for the constitution by the way he bends it to his own beliefs.


Shocked

Do you consider the Iraq War a "holy war," fought against Islam in the name of Christianity?
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 02:52 pm
Tico
Take your straw man and stuff it.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 03:03 pm
Tico wrote
Quote:
Muslim extremists are guided to Jihad by the Quran, and have a propensity to strap on nail bombs and blow themselves up in crowded cafes and buses in an effort to find their 77 virgins. Christian extremists -- guided by the Bible -- don't tend to do that ... unless you have some facts that indicate otherwise?


Christian extremists are more devious in that they attempt to take over governments and enforce their religious beliefs thru legislation. They are in the long run just as dangerous. In addition as history has proven they are no more adverse to killing than are the Islamic extremists
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 03:25 pm
rabel22 wrote:
Tico
Take your straw man and stuff it.


Laughing

I'm merely trying to ascertain the degree of the idiocy of your thinking, rabel. If you don't want to have your position examined, you probably ought not post here anymore.

As it is, I asked you for some facts to support your claim that Christian fundamentalists are "at least as dangerous as Muslims." In response, you offered up "Bush and company blowing up Iraqi people on his trumped up weapons of mass destruction crap," and you assert that Bush is the "ultimate Christian fundamentalist." There are a number of problems with your claims, but the first thing to do is identify that the only way that assertion makes any sense to support your claim, is if you actually do believe the War in Iraq is a war being fought in the name of Christianity.

So, as you can clearly see, it's no straw man. It's a legitimate question ... which you seem reluctant to answer.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Military Evangelism Deeper, Wider Than First Thought
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/30/2025 at 02:12:07