17
   

Get yer polls, bets, numbers & pretty graphs! Elections 2008

 
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 04:35 pm
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/29/delegate.counter/index.html

Play with the sliders, see how things turn out.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 05:16 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Oh, nah. She was up by 15 or 20 points in each of those states a few weeks ago. A little bounce back to her at the end is meaningless.

I dunno. Thats how the expectations game goes. Obama won, what, 10 races in a row or something - fairly or unfairly, I think that if Hillary wins both states tomorrow, even with a small margin, the media are gonna roll with it and declare it her "comeback story," and a lot of rank-and-file Dems will go with it. Hell, I know about the 20-point leads from a month ago, but even I would be disappointed if Obama doesnt win either state. Thats how it goes.

As for Obama's tendency to out-perform his polling, you're right of course - but it hasnt been a foolproof thing, see California.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 05:18 pm
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
Crist Says He'd Support a Repeat of Florida Democratic Primary

Nadine ElsibaiSun Mar 2, 1:37 PM ET

March 2 (Bloomberg) -- Florida Governor Charlie Crist said he'd support a repeat of the Democratic presidential primary so the state's delegates can be counted at the party's national convention.

Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said he's open to the possibility. Primary elections are paid for by a state's taxpayers, so the offer from Crist, a Republican, is ``very helpful'' because money is an issue, Dean said.

I think thats cool. Not a bad idea at all. I think the "re-do" option seemed like the fairest one from the start, just unwieldy. This would make it a bit less unwieldy.

And if RJB is right and the primary ends up taking place after the race has already been decided, then it's basically free Dem commercial airtime we're talking about.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 05:23 pm
Butrflynet wrote:
Has anyone heard if there are any results reported yet for all those uncounted ballots in New York? Remember they had a bunch of zero vote precincts reported?

That was just in the first count. By the time the news came out the numbers had already been corrected. (Whether the correction in turn was fully correct was still being questioned by some, but the zero-votes thing itself was never included in any official tally.)
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 05:37 pm
nimh wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Oh, nah. She was up by 15 or 20 points in each of those states a few weeks ago. A little bounce back to her at the end is meaningless.

I dunno. Thats how the expectations game goes. Obama won, what, 10 races in a row or something - fairly or unfairly, I think that if Hillary wins both states tomorrow, even with a small margin, the media are gonna roll with it and declare it her "comeback story," and a lot of rank-and-file Dems will go with it. Hell, I know about the 20-point leads from a month ago, but even I would be disappointed if Obama doesnt win either state. Thats how it goes.

As for Obama's tendency to out-perform his polling, you're right of course - but it hasnt been a foolproof thing, see California.


Remember this?

http://www.pollster.com/ADemSuperTuesday.png

Let's not forget two things 'bout CA:

First, only Zogby had Obama winning CA, near the end; yuck. Take them out and he probably did a point or two better.

Second, early voting really killed Obama in CA; and this may happen in OH as well. But TX? Doesn't look like it, in fact, the opposite may be true, per those fancy charts we've seen showing the meteoric rise in early voting favoring his districts heavily.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 06:55 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
nimh wrote:
As for Obama's tendency to out-perform his polling, you're right of course - but it hasnt been a foolproof thing, see California.

Remember this?

http://www.pollster.com/ADemSuperTuesday.png

OK you got me there! Razz

Should have looked up the actual numbers before positing that...
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 07:00 pm
Zogby has Obama winning both TX and OH.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 07:01 pm
I'd love to believe him but he's been the outlier before and seems to be now, too.
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 08:16 pm
Good evening. I have Obama by 3% in the popular vote in TX but getting a lot more than 53% of the delegates due to the weird system there.
OH, in my opinion, will go to Clinton by 7% but that won't help her much in the delegate race.
Sleep well and long. Catch yall tomorrow night. -rjb-
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 08:29 pm
Today's daily Gallup tracking poll:

Obama 48; Clinton 43.

But: "Obama had increased his lead to eight percentage points in Gallup Poll Daily election tracking from Feb. 28-March 1, but Clinton did significantly better in Sunday night's interviewing, resulting in the narrowed gap in the most recent three-day average."
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 08:36 pm
Texas

InsiderAdvantage poll
March 2, compared to February 27

49% (+2) Clinton
44% (+1) Obama

---------------

Intrade market prices

Re Texas

55.0 Obama
45.9 Clinton

Re Ohio

80.0 Clinton
25.7 Obama
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 08:44 pm
Updated graphs


http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/8061/ohiofeb2cx9.png


http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/7800/texasfeb2qh8.png
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Mar, 2008 09:22 pm
Clinton wins Ohio and maybe comes close in Texas. I love it. I hope these two continue to beat up on each other.

I sense a change in old "mo" here. Is the clock starting to hit midnight for cinderella, Obama? Has the hype peaked finally? Are folks finally starting to examine his record?
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Mar, 2008 06:55 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:


Second, early voting really killed Obama in CA; and this may happen in OH as well.
Cycloptichorn



What is going to hurt Obama in OH is the fact that they had a very early voter registration deadline for the primary, long before the Obama campaign had gotten the registration canvassing going in full force. He won't benefit from last minute new voter registrations like he usually does.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Mar, 2008 07:10 am
Any way you look at it; who ever wins out of McCain, Obama and Clinton would still better than someone who follows the Bush doctrine all down the line. That is assuming of course that McCain recent (last few years) changes towards the right are just to get the republican vote during the primaries. However; one thing he has pretty well always been consistent on has been the Iraq war (consistent as in supporting it, not his defenses of it.) It may or may not end up hurting him in the general election since more Americans want the Iraq war (occupation) to end.

Iraq Casts Shadow on Ohio, Texas Votes

Quote:
In an Associated Press-Yahoo News poll in December, nearly half of all respondents said they would be more likely to vote for a candidate who supports immediate withdrawal of troops, while just over a third said they would be less likely to do so. Only 15 percent said a candidate's war position would make no difference.

Backing for the war divides sharply along partisan lines.

A staggering 92 percent of Democrats in that poll said they opposed the war while 65 percent of Republicans favored it. Another result could bode ill for McCain: 77 percent of independents also said they oppose the war. That swing voting group is critical in the general election.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Mar, 2008 08:24 am
Crosspost from the Obama thread:

------------------

JPB wrote:
Steve 41oo wrote:
As an observer, I dont think race comes into it. Obama appears to be just as popular with younger whites as he is with non whites, which is to the credit oft American voters.

I think it's naive to think that race doesn't come into it. Obama appears to be just as popular with younger whites as he is with non-whites is a testament to the future but can't be generalized to say that race is a non-issue today.

Plus, it's an overstatement. Obama does well with young whites, but he isnt "just as popular with younger whites as he is with non whites" - not by a long shot.

Percentage vote for Obama among 17-29 year olds

Virginia
72% among whites
91% among blacks

Maryland
53% among whites
87% among blacks

California
63% among whites
35% among Latinos

Georgia
58% among whites
91% among blacks

Tennessee
39% among whites
81% among blacks

South Carolina
52% among non-blacks
77% among blacks


(I'm afraid those are the only states for which exit polls specify data for both the white and a non-white subgroup of 17-29 year olds. In all the other states, there werent two such groups constituting a large enough share for the pollsters to provide reliable crosstabs, or - in the very first states - there was no separate category by race/age combined.)
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Mar, 2008 08:28 am
This was good, I thought, from First Read:

Quote:
Other things to watch

Here are a few very plausible scenarios: Obama could net more delegates out of Vermont than Clinton does out of Ohio. Clinton can win both Ohio and Texas, 52%-48%, and lose the overall delegate battle tonight, thanks to how both Texas and Ohio award more delegates in African-American heavy areas as well as those crazy Texas caucuses. Speaking of Texas, Obama likely has a five-point cushion on the delegate front, meaning he could lose the state by five points and still net delegates. How will the media handle Clinton winning two states but Obama winning the most delegates tonight? Who wins the night? Bonus question: Who do we reward the state of Texas to if Clinton wins the popular vote in the primary but Obama nets the most delegates? And finally, for all the talk of bias against Clinton's campaign in the media, does anyone believe any other candidate could have lost 11-straight contests, be this far behind in delegates, and be simply two victories away from being back in the game? One thing the media has done is they've given Clinton every chance she wants to write her own comeback story. She gets another shot today.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Mar, 2008 10:48 am
Did I just see something on CNN about a poll ending yesterday with Obama 49% and Clinton 42%??

I saw the very tail end of it and I can't find any confirmation of it yet.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Mar, 2008 10:57 am
Hope so!!!

How is the weather looking today?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Mar, 2008 10:58 am
Dunno. There's a new ABC/WaPo poll out that has Obama at 50% and Clinton at 43% - but it's a national poll.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.55 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 04:50:02