0
   

A new, crazy candidate enters the race

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
mysteryman
 
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 06:13 am
So watch out democrats, she is one of you.

http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=879CD9B5-8FF1-4AAC-B2CC-C73A044FEBFE

Quote:
The time for confrontation has come for me," Cynthia McKinney told about 60 supporters on December 4. Launching her quest for the Green Party Presidential nomination, McKinney compared her "revolution" to Haiti, Venezuela, and war-torn Cote d'Ivoire.


Quote:
The former six-term Democrat Congresswoman was ousted in 2006 from Georgia's 4th Congressional district for the second time. In 2002, she spoke to the Black Congressional caucus claiming that President Bush had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks. She also openly solicited $10 million from the Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal; New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani rejected the check after the prince suggested U.S. foreign policy had brought on 9/11. McKinney's actions resulted in her first electoral defeat in the 2002 Democratic primary, after serving five terms in office. On the night of her 2002 primary defeat, McKinney's father told media, "Jews have bought everybody...J-E-W-S." She came back in 2004, and promptly signed a "call for immediate inquiry into evidence that suggests high-level government officials may have deliberately allowed the September 11th attacks to occur."


Quote:
The Greens are on in 21 states right now. If Cynthia McKinney is the nominee, and if she qualifies for primary season matching funds, and if the FEC pays primary season matching funds quickly, it is possible she could get on in all 51.


I thought there were only 50 states?

Does this woman actually think she can win?
She has finally gone crazy, IMHO.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 680 • Replies: 19
No top replies

 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 06:15 am
Surely no crazier than Alan Keyes, who's run hopeless campaigns from the right for years.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 06:18 am
She's not a Democrat.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 06:34 am
edgarblythe wrote:
She's not a Democrat.


Oh really??

Quote:
The former six-term Democrat Congresswoman


But you are correct.
According to Wikipedia, she quit the dem party in sept of 2007.
I apologize for calling her a democrat.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 08:18 am
Re: A new, crazy candidate enters the race
mysteryman wrote:
I thought there were only 50 states?

Does this woman actually think she can win?
She has finally gone crazy, IMHO.


Puerto Ricans vote in US Presidential elections, although they have no electoral college votes.

Only she knows if she thinks she can win, but regardless of her thoughts on winning getting matching funding and on all 51 ballots gives her a platform for her rhetoric.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 08:48 am
mysteryman wrote:
edgarblythe wrote:
She's not a Democrat.


Oh really??

Quote:
The former six-term Democrat Congresswoman


But you are correct.
According to Wikipedia, she quit the dem party in sept of 2007.
I apologize for calling her a democrat.


it's okay. It's not like you used filthy language by calling her a republican....
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 08:48 am
Re: A new, crazy candidate enters the race
JPB wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
I thought there were only 50 states?

Does this woman actually think she can win?
She has finally gone crazy, IMHO.


Puerto Ricans vote in US Presidential elections, although they have no electoral college votes.

Only she knows if she thinks she can win, but regardless of her thoughts on winning getting matching funding and on all 51 ballots gives her a platform for her rhetoric.


bingo.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 10:33 am
Guess Kucinich is no longer the crazy one now.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 10:50 am
She is a certified loon that's for sure.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 11:03 am
Is this the same one who had a scuffle with a Capitol policeman? Or is she someone different. Frankly, i can't be arsed to go look it up myself.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 11:24 am
Arsed, or un-arsed?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 11:31 am
It's an expression from British English, but if you think you can run with Snood, by all means, help yourself . . .
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 12:02 pm
Sorry, dude. I ain't pickin up what you're puttin down...

not receiving messages clearly...

not comprehending what you're sending...

not diggin what you're rappin about...

an 'arse' is a 'behind', or 'butt', best I understood it. So, when you said you couldn't be arsed, I asked if you couldn't be un-arsed, as in, persuaded to leave a seated position...
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 12:05 pm
snood wrote:
not comprehending


that's a bit obvious
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 12:08 pm
Setanta wrote:
Is this the same one who had a scuffle with a Capitol policeman? Or is she someone different. Frankly, i can't be arsed to go look it up myself.


Yuppers.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 12:15 pm
Thanks, BX . . . i thought the name sounded familiar . . . i ain't surprised . . .
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 12:18 pm
snood wrote:
Sorry, dude. I ain't pickin up what you're puttin down...

not receiving messages clearly...

not comprehending what you're sending...

not diggin what you're rappin about...

an 'arse' is a 'behind', or 'butt', best I understood it. So, when you said you couldn't be arsed, I asked if you couldn't be un-arsed, as in, persuaded to leave a seated position...


In the English spoken outside the United States, "can't be arsed" means "i can't be bothered to do that."
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 12:21 pm
Setanta wrote:
snood wrote:
Sorry, dude. I ain't pickin up what you're puttin down...

not receiving messages clearly...

not comprehending what you're sending...

not diggin what you're rappin about...

an 'arse' is a 'behind', or 'butt', best I understood it. So, when you said you couldn't be arsed, I asked if you couldn't be un-arsed, as in, persuaded to leave a seated position...


In the English spoken outside the United States, "can't be arsed" means "i can't be bothered to do that."


Didn't know that, that actually 'splains a few conversations

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 12:24 pm
Quote:
In the English spoken outside the United States, "can't be arsed" means "i can't be bothered to do that."


I've heard this one a lot from pals in Wales and Isle of Wight.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Dec, 2007 07:06 am
ehBeth wrote:
snood wrote:
not comprehending


that's a bit obvious


that's a bit snotty. I obviously wasn't the only one who didn't understand.

thanks, Set.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » A new, crazy candidate enters the race
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.83 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 08:52:17
▲ ▼