0
   

Bush Leauge Justice

 
 
Reply Mon 10 Dec, 2007 08:25 pm
Sometimes, it's difficult to wrap one's head around all the changes we've seen over the last 6 years.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-abrams/bush-league-justice_b_75998.html

Quote:
Bush League Justice

Posted December 9, 2007 | 05:53 PM (EST)

Bush League Justice is a series (airing Monday-Thursday at 9 pm on MSNBC) that stems from my increasing frustration and outrage over how the Bush administration has politicized the usually apolitical Justice Department. In the process, it has significantly abused its authority to try to enhance power at the expense of any sense of objective justice. Many of the administration's most controversial maneuvers have been widely reported, from the torture memos to the NSA's warrantless searches to the U.S. Attorney scandal to the appointment of only the most conservative of judges and justices.

But that is really just the tip of this administration's ongoing effort to uproot the Justice Department. As we will show the week of December 10, they have regularly circumvented Congress, and decimated some of the most fundamental and cherished principles that define justice in this country.

Maybe most egregious is the now nearly unrecognizable Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice. Since 1957, it has led the effort to enforce civil rights laws and the fight for minorities. Even Richard Nixon's effort to delay implementation of school desegregation, was less radical then how this president has flipped the goals and mission of the Division and allowed it to become a tool of the radical right.

Instead of pursuing cases of discrimination against African Americans, the Division under President Bush has focused on supposed reverse discrimination against whites and religious discrimination cases against Christians. A Boston Globe report even showed that almost half of the new hires in that department who had "civil rights experience" had "experience" only in defending employers or -- fighting -- affirmative action.

Those in the Voting Rights Section of the Justice Department must really feel like they are in an upside down world. From 2001 to 2006, not one voting discrimination case was brought on behalf of African-American voters. Instead they have focused on alleged voter fraud cases that effectively target minority communities rather than protecting them.

We will also expose the president's unprecedented use and misuse of so-called signing statements; addendums he tacks on to laws when signing them. The president has effectively declared the right to disobey more than 750 laws. From the interrogation of prisoners to torture to investigations by U.S. officials in Iraq, President Bush has added a caveat that says, "I will only enforce this "if." So he is effectively telling Congress thanks for your advice on this law, but I reserve the right to ignore this law. Rather than working with Congress to pass a law that he will enforce, the president chooses to simply ignore them.

Maybe the most obvious betrayal of the public trust has been politically motivated prosecutions. A University of Minnesota study conducted this year shows that for every elected Republican investigated during this president's tenure, there were seven elected Democrats investigated. The most flagrant example may be in Alabama where the democratic former Governor was convicted in 2006 on corruption charges.

A case that led 44 former state Attorneys General, Democrats and Republicans, to complain of irregularities in the investigation and prosecution. They even said it called into "question the basic fairness that is the linchpin of our system of justice." That is hardly surprising considering that there were allegations and even witnesses who said that then-presidential advisor Karl Rove convinced the U.S. Attorney to prosecute and that the key witness made similar allegations against prominent Republicans that were never even investigated.

This series is long overdue. The scandal with the firings of the U.S. Attorneys under Attorney General Alberto Gonzales exposed the underbelly of this administration's penchant for putting politics over objectivity and qualifications. We now hope to dissect the subject more fully and help spur change as the new Attorney General Michael Mukasey tries to rebuild confidence and trust in our Justice Department.

This post first appeared on MSNBC's blog.


I'm watching the first part of the series - on the gutting of the civil rights division. It is quite good. I'll post a transcript if I can find one.

Cycloptichorn
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 521 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 07:36 am
"Instead of pursuing cases of discrimination against African Americans, the Division under President Bush has focused on supposed reverse discrimination against whites and religious discrimination cases against Christians."

There is no such thing as "reverse discrimination".

If a white person is discriminated against, it is just as wrong as if the act happened to a non-white.

If Huffington is suggesting that there is no discrimination against whites and christians, she is dead wrong.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 08:15 am
everyone is discriminated against by someone and everyone is discriminatory to a degree even if it's a very small one.

We suck. We are a species doomed to failure. Might as well get to the trough and graze while we can, because that's all there is.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 08:23 am
The glass is always half-full with you, bear.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Dec, 2007 08:35 am
Ticomaya wrote:
The glass is always half-full with you, bear.


actually the glass is neither half empty or half full.... it was just made too large...
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Dec, 2007 11:06 am
Quote:

Judiciary Committee approves contempt resolutions.

In a 12-8 vote this morning, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved contempt resolutions against Karl Rove and White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten for their refusal to comply with the U.S. attorney investigation. Bush, citing executive privilege, has "refused to allow Rove and Bolten to testify or turn over documents to the panel." Republican Sens. Arlen Specter (R-PA) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) both supported the resolutions. 11:20 am | Comment (12)


http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/1207/Senate_Judiciary_approves_contempt_resolutions_against_Rove_Bolten.html

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bush Leauge Justice
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 05:44:42