Should the US government take an active role in enforcing / penalizing / monitoring / controlling dietary-lifestyle choices in the interests of improving the population's heath under the guise of universal healthcare and/or from the perspective of "public safety" in general?
The US government certainly does so with respect to a number of other "public safety" considerations such as seatbelts and marijuana, thus I ask why should it be different as to the irresponsible consumption of fast foods under the umbrella of universal healthcare, or for that matter from the perspective of "public safety" in general?
Now understand, I'm not saying that it should-would be that way, but what would logically stop the government from taking a such a position against the irresponsible consumption of fast foods under the guise of universal healthcare and/or from the perspective of "public safety" in general?
Now I know about the slippery slope logical fallacy, and if you feel it applies then show your arguments as to why any consumption of marijuana is penalized by the US government, but fast food is not.
Also, it should be noted that I live in a Canada with universal healthcare and we have what's called "ParticipACTION". Despite government hype to the contrary its efficacy is dubious.
http://www.participaction.com/