0
   

A Post-Iraq G.I. Bill

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Fri 9 Nov, 2007 10:31 am
Op-Ed Contributors
A Post-Iraq G.I. Bill

By JIM WEBB and CHUCK HAGEL
Published: November 9, 2007
MEMBERS of Congress and other political leaders often say that the men and women who have served in our military since 9/11 are the "new greatest generation." Well, here's a thought from two infantry combat veterans of the Vietnam era's "wounded generation": if you truly believe that our Iraq and Afghanistan veterans are like those who fought in World War II, let us provide them with the same G.I. Bill that was given to the veterans of that war.

In terms of providing true opportunity, the World War II G.I. Bill was one of the most important pieces of legislation in our history. It paid college tuition and fees, bought textbooks and provided a monthly stipend for eight million of the 16 million who served. Many of our colleagues in the Senate who before the war could never have dreamed of college found themselves at some of the nation's finest educational institutions.

Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey went to Columbia on the G.I. bill; John Warner of Virginia to Washington and Lee and the University of Virginia Law School; Daniel Inouye of Hawaii to the University of Hawaii and the George Washington University Law School; and Ted Stevens of Alaska to the University of California, Los Angeles, and Harvard Law School.

Veterans today have only the Montgomery G.I. Bill, which requires a service member to pay $100 a month for the first year of his or her enlistment in order to receive a flat payment for college that averages $800 a month. This was a reasonable enlistment incentive for peacetime service, but it is an insufficient reward for wartime service today. It is hardly enough to allow a veteran to attend many community colleges.

It would cover only about 13 percent of the cost of attending Columbia, 42 percent at the University of Hawaii, 14 percent at Washington and Lee, 26 percent at U.C.L.A. and 11 percent at Harvard Law School.

College costs have skyrocketed, and a full G.I. Bill for those who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan would be expensive. But Congress has recently appropriated $19 billion next year for federal education grants purely on the basis of financial need. A G.I. Bill for those who have given so much to our country, often including repeated combat tours, should be viewed as an obligation.

We must put together the right formula that will demonstrate our respect for those who have stepped forward to serve in these difficult times. First-class service to country deserves first-class appreciation.

Jim Webb, Democrat of Virginia, and Chuck Hagel, Republican of Nebraska, are United States senators.


A A fitting reward for those who served.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 518 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Nov, 2007 11:06 am
Many folks have done the analysis of what the WWII GI bill cost and what the benefit was. The cost was staggering at the time - well over a billion dollars, but the return was over 100 to 1 in terms of economic development. Clearly there is a lot to be learned from that experience, not only for GI's, but for other under-educated portions of the population.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Nov, 2007 12:04 pm
hear,hear
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Nov, 2007 11:59 am
Veterans abandoned
Published: November 12, 2007





All too often, soldiers who return from Iraq or Afghanistan (and those who served in Vietnam or Korea) have been left to fend for themselves, with little help from the government.

Tens of thousands of reservists and National Guard troops whose jobs were supposedly protected while they were at war have been denied prompt re-employment upon their return or else lost seniority, pay and other benefits. Some 1.8 million veterans were unable to get care in veterans' hospitals and clinics in 2004 and lacked health insurance to pay for care elsewhere. More wounded soldiers are surviving the current conflicts with grievous injuries; their long-term medical care and disability benefits could exceed the amount spent so far in prosecuting the war in Iraq.

The entire burden of today's wars has been carried by a voluntary military force and its families. The larger public has not faced a draft, paid higher taxes or been asked to make any other sacrifice. The least a grateful nation can do is support returning troops


A national shame
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Nov, 2007 12:06 pm
I'm all for the GI bill.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » A Post-Iraq G.I. Bill
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 03:41:39