1
   

MIT Sues Architect Gehry Over 'Flaws'

 
 
Reply Wed 7 Nov, 2007 03:04 am
Quote:
Gehry sued over leaky university building

· Guggenheim architect accused of faulty design
· $300m centre plagued by problems, lawsuit says


Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington
Wednesday November 7, 2007
The Guardian

It was supposed to be a geek palace for some of the brightest people on the planet. Dissonant angles, sloping floors, an exterior that suggested some sort of implosion - these were just the sort of challenges that inspire the great brains sheltered therein.
But now the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has filed a lawsuit against the architect, Frank Gehry, alleging that faulty design has reduced a building that was supposed to be a campus centrepiece into a leaky tenement.

Patrons who commission Gehry expect innovation. He is responsible for the soaring metallic curves of the Guggenheim museum in Bilbao as well as the Walt Disney concert hall in his native Los Angeles, and is often cited as one of the leading architects of the 21st century.
But the lawsuit against Gehry's practice and the contractor, Skanska USA Building Inc, alleges that the university's $300m (£143.8m) Ray and Maria Stata Centre has been plagued with problems since it was completed three years ago.

The suit, filed last week in Boston, seeks unspecified damages for costs and expenses incurred by MIT.

MIT in its suit said it had sought to create a group of buildings that would encourage innovation and exchange among the departments of computing, artificial intelligence and linguistics, which are all housed in the Stata Centre.

The university paid Gehry's firm $15m for its work. But, according to the suit, poor drainage almost immediately led to cracks in the outdoor amphitheatre, snow and ice fell off the irregular angles of the walls and blocked emergency exits, and mould sprouted on exterior brick. The university says it spent more than $1.5m hiring a company to repair the damage.

"Gehry breached its duties by providing deficient design services and drawings," the suit said, according to the Boston Globe.

Gehry's critics have long accused him of overvaulting ambition, both in terms of assessing the depths of his clients' pockets as well as the technological limitations on turning his visions into reality.

Two of Gehry's earlier university projects have run into difficulties. A 1986 engineering building for the University of California at Irvine has been torn down because it leaked. A building for the management school of Case Western Reserve University in Ohio cost more than double the original estimate.

Critics have been divided since the Stata Centre's completion, with some praising its innovation and others denouncing it as a blight on the landscape.

In 1989, when Gehry was awarded the prestigious Pritzker prize, the citation read: "His sometimes controversial, but always arresting body of work, has been variously described as iconoclastic, rambunctious and impermanent, but the jury, in making this award, commends this restless spirit that has made his buildings a unique expression of contemporary society and its ambivalent values."

Gehry Partners did not respond to calls and emails from The Boston Globe. A spokesman for MIT declined to comment to Associated Press because of the pending lawsuit.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,273 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Nov, 2007 03:04 am
http://i24.tinypic.com/5oursn.jpg
Photo: Walter Hinteler


http://i20.tinypic.com/55m6c5.jpg
The Guardian, 07.11.07, page 6
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Nov, 2007 04:43 am
"Frank Gehry made his mark on Chicago with his sleek, swooping designs for Millennium Park's Jay Pritzker Pavilion and the adjacent BP Bridge. He is also consulting on a project to refurbish the modernist Inland Steel Building at 30 W. Monroe St. "


In today's Chicago Tribune:

MIT: Gehry building a wreck [Boston Globe report]
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Nov, 2007 05:01 am
Many famous architects were complete morons when it came to a building s integrity or site conditions and many(like Wright) were too much self absorbed to consider involving structural engineers except only in limited capacities.

Frank Lloyd WRights famous "FallingWater" was a disaster for its integrity and "water tightness". In the last 5 years it was almost rebuilt..
Some of his prairie houses began leaking shortly after being built.

Many of these single design "mickey Mansions" that are all the rage in US are a complete wste of space and are engineering abominations . Any house that has so many "bump outs" and "telescoping " roof lines and seveeal corners, always present potential for leakage.

Our company was once retained by a township to provide a second opinion about the consequences of the location of a small development of very huge homes. All the homes were designed to fit within a large swale. This very swale was a favorite runnoff path and the location resulted in houses that periodically had their lower floors under water (many had "daylight basements) and we had to retrofit drainage conduits. The builder washed his hands of any responsibility and had a letter in his files that stated how he disagreed with the site's suitability (I hate fixing other peoples screw ups because , by extension, I can become the target of suites if the system(which could have been avoided by better siting) fails)

Ive used architects for mining support building projects where we wanted to maximize light, but I always had them surrounded by a good engineering team.
Architects , for the most part, dont know Jack about physical consequences of designs
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Nov, 2007 12:09 am
I see that the initial lines are being drawn based upon the old argument that MIT "cheapened" up Gehry's design by substituting againsts GEhry"s reccomendation. This is entirely predictable because Gehry , like most architects, tried to hve himself installed as the construction manager of his design, when MIT used the general contractor as CM.

While this is often a valid complaint that most architects have, they should factor their CM rates in the design base, especially since they often charge their services as a percentage of the project costs and , if they save their client money (so their fees are naturally lower) they should negotiate a completion fee that is calculated such that this fee is a premium if the job is done economically.

Otherwise the CM is gonna be a lacky of the general contractor , and these guys have (IMO) conflicts of interest by "cutting corners" wherever they can.


Of course, the fact that architects arent engineers still holds true.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Nov, 2007 01:39 am
farmerman wrote:
Of course, the fact that architects arent engineers still holds true.

What I always thought is that
a) they've at least some better than just basic knowledges about engineering,
b) they work together with them ...
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Nov, 2007 04:29 am
Wright was famous for dismissing engineering sdvice . Consequently, most of Frank Lloyd Wright designed buildings, leak.
0 Replies
 
tinygiraffe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Nov, 2007 04:39 am
geodesic domes have the same problem, but fuller was still a genius.

then again, that building looks like a cartoon. it doesn't so much look futuristic as made for kids, kind of like all the scenery in day of the tentacle... okay, i can see how geeks would like that. still... wow.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Nov, 2007 04:55 am
I wonder where in the specs did MIT "cheapen up" and decide not to use Gehry"s design?
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Nov, 2007 10:38 am
Just saw this, haven't read the Globe article yet.
On the leaks, I'm not surprised as I remember leak comments re Gehry's work for near forever, however trustworthy those comments were or weren't.

Some architects work hand in hand with fantastic engineers, Arup and his firm being one. Some architects aren't engineering dismissers - there are many combo firms, A & E.

For me, the MIT building has been an eye-roller, leaky or not.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Nov, 2007 04:34 pm
Commentary on this from Stephen Bayley in the Guardian -

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/review/story/0,,2208851,00.html



Talk about sick buildings
]Frank Gehry is the latest architect to catch a cold

Stephen Bayley
Sunday November 11, 2007
The Observer


Arrogant architects are tolerant of technical failure. Indeed, some regard water intrusion, buckling, settlement and shear cracks as badges of honour. The great Frank Lloyd Wright insisted that if a building did not leak, the design was not pushing the envelope. So it is no surprise to learn last week that the great Frank Gehry's Stata Centre at Massachusetts Institute of Technology is leaking too. So much so that he is next meeting the client in court.

The history of architecture is punctuated by building calamities, some comic, others tragic, mostly just uncomfortable. That famous tower in Pisa leans because Bonanno Pisano's structure was too ambitious for the unstable Tuscan soil. Cathedrals often fell down in the Middle Ages because masons were ignorant of the law of translational equilibrium. They usually blamed it on earthquakes, not incompetence. Ely and Lincoln had such problems, but East Anglia is not a seismically lively area.

The modern period is especially rich in problem architecture, as building technology struggles to keep pace with advanced litigation processes. YRM's Warwick University became infamous when its beautiful white ceramic tile cladding started dropping off on to startled students. James Stirling's landmark History Faculty in Cambridge suffered from violent solar gain. It was only made worse when they cleaned the windows.

In Boston, IM Pei pushed the envelope with the superb Hancock Tower, at 790 feet the tallest building then to be clad with mirror-finish, double-glazed glass panels. The result? A third of them fell off in the first storm of 1973 and they filled the gaps with rescue plywood. Then there was the Millennium Bridge. Norman Foster's design did not anticipate the destructive rhythmic excitations of happy tourists, so it wobbled. The engineers fixed it. And when Paul Andreu's new terminal at Charles de Gaulle airport collapsed in 2004 with fatal results, the architect was said to be ignorant of the cause. Alas, the perpetrators of the World Trade Centre atrocity were tragically assisted by architect Minoru Yamasaki's insistence on ingenious lightweight construction.

But Gehry will be bullish when he has his day in court. Recently, a disgruntled New Yorker had arthouse T-shirts printed with the legend '**** Frank Gehry'. Gehry was delighted and bought a whole consignment. His interpretation of the message was not that it was a sartorial expression of the ultimate labio-fricative insult, rather an invitation to enjoy a romantic dalliance with greatness. Meanwhile, the lights are going out in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » MIT Sues Architect Gehry Over 'Flaws'
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/07/2024 at 08:11:00