mysteryman wrote:engineer wrote:OK, but realize that the money is not given away. It is payment for enactment of policies the US favors. Those policies might produce economic benefit and so might pay for themselves many times over, or they may not, but our only recourse is at the ballot box. To call these programs "give aways" is not accurate.
Are you including humanitarian aid in your definition?
Tell me what policies did the US want enacted when we sent disaster relief supplies to Asia after the tsunami.
That counts as money spent, doesnt it?
Yes, I include humanitarian aid and even the money spent by the military supporting operations. Those operations make great photo ops and the people remember all those US helping hands and all the US flags on the boxes of food. It's a great boost to the reputation of the US, especially in an area where the US needs to be seen as a friendly presence. It plays well at home also. Lots of wins for the government on the tsunami especially.
Some of these considerations also go into where Navy units take port calls. A carrier pulling into port will drop over a million dollars into the local economy just in sailors dropping cash around town. Add payments for port services and it adds up to a nice boost. The US plans those visits carefully and sometimes uses them to "reward" a country that is pulling our direction.