2
   

[answered] Possibly I'm just very thick...

 
 
Truthyness
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 03:36 pm
ehBeth wrote:
errr, no. not an option


No worries, m'dear, dlowan got there afore ye.
It's the Royal We that the triggers those sensitivities says he/she? So sorry! We shall commit never to err thus Rolling Eyes again.

Cheerio.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 03:55 pm
ehBeth wrote:
Truthyness wrote:
And again, ehBeth... be a poppet would you


errr, no.

not an option



Garn.


There's a poppet in there somewhere, struggling to get out.







(Running away, very fast....)
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 04:27 pm
Yeah, I'd run very fast if I were you, you widgetty wabbit... imagine calling ehBeth a poppet! I nearly spat my wine out at that one Smile
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 04:31 pm
Mame wrote:
Yeah, I'd run very fast if I were you, you widgetty wabbit... imagine calling ehBeth a poppet! I nearly spat my wine out at that one Smile


I am not so stupid as to call her a poppet, I merely alluded to the possibility of an INNER poppet.


I am sure we all have one, just as we have an inner Genghis Khan.
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 04:32 pm
One wonders how many other identities you have inside of you, you ball of fluff.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 04:33 pm
Mame wrote:
One wonders how many other identities you have inside of you, you ball of fluff.


I speak of "us" not "me".
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 04:36 pm
Is that the Royal Us?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 04:44 pm
Mame wrote:
Is that the Royal Us?



No, it is the bog common "us".



Genghis, you know, was rumoured to be short, with poofity hair, and fond of gin.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 04:46 pm
Genghis was much more fertile than Victoria.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 04:51 pm
What's a poppet?

Ok, I know I can look it up. Sounds storybook, and I had a storybook spare childhood.
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 05:46 pm
The word poppet is an older spelling of puppet, from the Middle English popet, meaning a small child or doll. In British Dialect it continues to hold this meaning. Poppet is also a chiefly English term of endearment.

In folk-magic and witchcraft, a poppet is a doll made to represent a person, for casting spells on that person.
"To some others at these times he [the Devil] teacheth how to make pictures of wax or clay. That by the roasting thereof, the persons that they beare the name of, may be continually melted or die away by continually sickness."

A brand of chocolate sweet (UK)

In nautical terms it also means any of the vertical timbers bracing the bow or stern of a vessel about to be launched.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poppet

No relation to Poppety head which of course ehbeth is
0 Replies
 
Truthyness
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 06:17 pm
Coo er! what singular thing have I started!

And I learn there's a Ghengis-Poppet amongst us (dispensation craved for plurals here)!

Thanks Dadpad for that very interesting "folk-magic and witchcraft" reference. In that particular context the word conjures up Sheela-na-gigs ... but p'rhaps, on reflection, that's not a path we (and I mean we) want to tread here!Embarrassed

A dieu, sleep tight all ye now in twilight hours Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
Truthyness
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 06:44 pm
Mame wrote:
Yeah, I'd run very fast if I were you, you widgetty wabbit... imagine calling ehBeth a poppet! I nearly spat my wine out at that one Smile


Irony, darls, irony. :wink:
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 06:54 pm
Thanks, dad, that was helpful.
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Oct, 2007 07:02 pm
Truthyness wrote:


A dieu, sleep tight all ye now in twilight hours Embarrassed


Its the middle of the day why would i sleep.

Or was it an invitaion?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 01:19 am
Lawksamussy!


It's a digression thread!
0 Replies
 
Truthyness
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 04:16 am
dadpad wrote:
Truthyness wrote:


A dieu, sleep tight all ye now in twilight* hours Embarrassed


Its the middle of the day why would i sleep.

Or was it an invitaion?


Your reference earlier to OZ was not lost, hence the qualified comment: 'all ye now'. And you'll have picked up on the Sheela reference no doubt Laughing

Though, as to invitations, I'm pretty open. This forum's an invitation in itself ... to share some great crack. And what with being a night bird, the chances are we'll meet Razz

Cheers Dadpad (a propos is that an anagram?)

*poets license, read night.
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 09:04 am
Truthyness wrote:
dadpad wrote:
Truthyness wrote:


A dieu, sleep tight all ye now in twilight* hours Embarrassed


Its the middle of the day why would i sleep.

Or was it an invitaion?


Cheers Dadpad (a propos is that an anagram?)


Tis only what I am most importantly.

Ps. Its "sheila". But we'll forgive you that one.
0 Replies
 
Truthyness
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 03:24 pm
dadpad wrote:


Ps. Its "sheila". But we'll forgive you that one.


Tut, tut, Dadpad! you're for it now!

And there was I thinking you'd want to give Sheelas of all kinds a wide berth ... would that it had been so. And Lord knows I tried hard to steer clear of the ribald reference in a thread already denounced (rightly) by dlwhiterabbit as digression!

So I failed and here we go:

It may be that, on occasion, birds in OZ have been heard referred to, as Sheilas; an appellation - if I understand things correctly - of Celtic origin and one which may be, indeed is, written in a variety of ways. Take my own sister Shelagh for example (bless her) and the Celtic idol Sheelas, to list but two. And this last Sheela was precisely where I feared to tread! Rember DP, you pushed me.

Sharp outlet of breath... hesitates one last time .... takes the plunge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheela_na_Gig

You see the topic is not predisposed to clear the (any?) censors, especially not here on these squeaky clean family boards ... But you forced my hand ... and in the interest of general knowledge and culture... Don't say I didn't warn you Dadpad. Should you follow the link, you may be discouraged from ever calling anyone of the feminine gender a Sheila again!

This is all your fault, it was the fascinating bumph you turned out on the term poppet that triggered it. Just thank your stars that I don't know how to bundle in images with my posts, or I think www.able2know.org would have risked implosion!

G'day Bruce.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Oct, 2007 05:46 pm
Nah, they're "Sheilas"...if anyone uses the term now...it's very dated.


And digreessing is good.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How to use the new able2know - Discussion by Craven de Kere
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
I'm the developer - Discussion by Nick Ashley
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
A2K censors tags? - Discussion by hingehead
New A2K Bugs - Discussion by sozobe
New A2K annoyances - Discussion by sozobe
The a2k world is changing 3: about voting - Discussion by Craven de Kere
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Welcome to the 'New' My Posts - Discussion by Nick Ashley
The "I get folksonomy" club - Discussion by Robert Gentel
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 12:14:59