Nobel Fraud Prize

The whole case Algor and others try to make is a joke from every possible viewing angle.

Algor points out the graphs of CO2 levels and temperature, the obivous implication being that the CO2 levels CAUSE the temperature levels, when it is clear that the opposite is the case i.e. that the CO2 levels LAG the temperature levels by several centuries. I.e. the temperature fluctuations cause the fluctuations in CO2 levels.

We observe warming on Mars and two or three other bodies in our system; nobody smokes cigars or drives SUVs on Mars...

We have the obvious cases of the medieval temperature optimum in Europe and the mini ice age of the 1600s long before anybody could even think of blaming human activity for it.

We observe absolute correlations between solar activity and temperature trends. Newer paradigms as to how stars actually work PREDICT periodic heating and cooling trends.

Algor's thing, for anybody who hasn't figured it out, is about power more than anything else, and about the idea of tossing democratic institutions in favor of granting somebody like Algor fiat powers to do battle with the overwhelming planetary evil of man-made global warming. The basic idea seems to be to convince the world that we're out of time and that if this bold new visionary plan is not implemented, we'll all die.

Again, Tim Slagle on how to deal with 23" of water over 100 years...

http://tinyurl.com/3xacxo

Gunga, on the global warming thread, as a lark, I took the solar radiance information figures, used my calculator and in a few minutes, I calculated the increased heat into the earths atmosphere computed into about 0.3 degrees centigrade. This was based on using the average temperature above absolute zero. The increase in radiance is dismissed because it is supposedly too small, but I decided to run the numbers by applying it to the temperature scale. Interestingly, this is approximately the same increase observed in today's climate, if you can believe all the measurements are close to accurate. Also interesting, nobody has shot this calculation down yet. I am still waiting for a scientist to come up with a reason why a simple answer can't be a correct answer or at least part of the answer, and why such a calculation doesn't make as much sense as some obscure and complex greenhouse gas formula cranked into a computer that nobody understands or can relate to the real world. Also, the beauty of my calculation did not require a government grant or millions or billions of dollars. I have done it free at no taxpayer expense.

correction okie... most people LIKE YOU make it the butt of humor....and the recepients don't know or care....