Reply
Wed 10 Oct, 2007 11:01 am
October 10, 2007
Picky Eaters? They Get It From You
By KIM SEVERSON
New York Times
A WEEK'S worth of dinners for young Fiona Jacobson looks like this: Noodles. Noodles. Noodles. Noodles. French fries. Noodles. On the seventh day, the 5-year-old from Forest Hills, Queens, might indulge in a piece of pizza crust, with no sauce or cheese.
Over in New Jersey, the Bakers changed their November family vacation to accommodate Sasha, an 11-year-old so averse to fruits and vegetables that the smell of orange juice once made him faint. Instead of flying to Prague, Sasha's parents decided to go to Barcelona, where they hope the food will be more to his liking.
And at the Useloff household, young Ethan's tastes are so narrow that their home in Westfield, N.J., works something like a diner.
"I do the terrible mommy thing and make everyone separate dinners," Jennifer Useloff said.
All three families share a common problem. Their children are not only picky eaters, prone to reject foods they once seemed to love, but they are also neophobic, which means they fear new food.
But for parents who worry that their children will never eat anything but chocolate milk, Gummi vitamins and the occasional grape, a new study offers some relief. Researchers examined the eating habits of 5,390 pairs of twins between 8 and 11 years old and found children's aversions to trying new foods are mostly inherited.
The message to parents: It's not your cooking, it's your genes.
The study, led by Dr. Lucy Cooke of the department of epidemiology and public health at University College London, was published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in August. Dr. Cooke and others in the field believe it is the first to use a standard scale to investigate the contribution of genetics and environment to childhood neophobia.
According to the report, 78 percent is genetic and the other 22 percent environmental.
"People have really dismissed this as an idea because they have been looking at the social associations between parents and their children," Dr. Cooke said. "I came from a position of not wanting to blame parents."
Nutritionists, pediatricians and academic researchers have recently shifted focus to children who eat too much instead of those who eat too little. But cases of obesity are less frequent than bouts of pickiness.
In some families, communal meals become brutal battlegrounds, if they haven't been altogether abandoned. Cooks break under the weight of devising a thousand variations on macaroni and cheese. Strolls through the farmers' markets are replaced with trudges through the frozen food aisle.
For parents who know that sharing the fruits of the kitchen with family is one of the deep pleasures of cooking, having a child who rejects most food is a unique sort of heartbreak.
Hugh Garvey, an editor at Bon Appétit magazine, knows the heartbreak firsthand. He shares his experience on gastrokid.com, a blog he created with a British pal that details the gastronomic life of families. His daughter, 6, is an omnivore's dream child. But his son, 3, will eat only brown food.
"The way I comfort myself is the way any quasi-sane parent comforts himself," Mr. Garvey said. "It's like potty training. Eventually, they're going to graduate from diapers. In the end, he'll eat something green."
Most children eat a wide variety of foods until they are around 2, when they suddenly stop. The phase can last until the child is 4 or 5. It's an evolutionary response, researchers believe. Toddlers' taste buds shut down at about the time they start walking, giving them more control over what they eat. "If we just went running out of the cave as little cave babies and stuck anything in our mouths, that would have been potentially very dangerous," Dr. Cooke said.
A natural skepticism of new foods is a healthy part of a child's development, said Ellyn Satter, a child nutrition expert whose books, including "Child of Mine: Feeding With Love and Good Sense" (Bull Publishing, 2000), have developed a cult following among parents of picky eaters.
Each child has a unique set of likes and dislikes that Ms. Satter believes are genetically determined. The only way children discover what they are is by putting food in their mouths and taking it out over and over again, she said.
"Of course, it's hard when children are just so blasé about food or refuse it, especially for parents who spend a lot of time thinking about it and preparing it," she said.
The genetic link makes sense to Jennifer Useloff, whose son enjoys only variations on the same theme: bread and cheese, with some fruit and the occasional chicken nugget. His younger sister, Samara, isn't as picky but sometimes follows her brother's lead.
Mrs. Useloff, 36, was once a picky eater herself. Although she drank gallons of milk, she couldn't abide raw fruits or vegetables. New foods with strange textures literally frightened her.
The aversion lasted until her 20s, when she worked to overcome her fears. Even today, she refuses to buy cucumbers.
"I feel guilty," she said. "I worry that I've done this to them."
Even though food neophobia appears to be genetic, doctors say parents of picky eaters can't just surrender and boil another pot of pasta.
"We have to understand that biology is not destiny," said Patricia Pliner, a social psychology professor at the University of Toronto. "This doesn't necessarily mean there is nothing we can do about the environment."
People who study children prone to flinging themselves on the floor at the mere mention of broccoli agree that calm, repeated exposure to new foods every day for between five days to two weeks is an effective way to overcome a child's fears. (Other strategies for getting children to eat are included in an accompanying article.)
Of course, attempting to introduce the same food week after week can be a Sisyphean task. Some parents just give up. That is more or less what Jessica Seinfeld did.
Mrs. Seinfeld, the wife of the actor Jerry Seinfeld and the mother of three young children, became fed up with trying to get her children to eat fruits and vegetables. The oldest, Sascha, who is 6, is so picky she used to dictate what the rest of the family ate.
"It made cooking in my house impossible," Mrs. Seinfeld said. "I was so miserable every night. I felt like a failure as a cook and a failure as a mother."
So Mrs. Seinfeld took an end run around the problem and developed a method of feeding her children that is, essentially, based on lying.
Her new book, "Deceptively Delicious" (Harper Collins), outlines a series of recipes based on fruit and vegetable purées that are blended into food in a way that she says children won't notice. Half a cup of butternut squash disappears into pasta coated with milk and margarine. Pancakes turn pink with beets. Avocado hides in chocolate pudding and spinach in brownies.
"My theory, and my husband will back me up on it, is that all of this food tastes better," she said.
And even though she admits to leaving a box of macaroni and cheese on the counter when she's making the stealth vegetable version, she doesn't think her children will mind when they discover that mom's pulled a fast one.
"My kids now are really starting to get that this is a special way my mom knows how to cook," she said.
Some experts don't buy the method.
"It doesn't strike me as the best strategy," Dr. Pliner said.
There is the issue of being found out, at which point a child might not trust new foods the parents present. And hiding foods doesn't help a child learn to appreciate new tastes, she said.
"What we want children to do is like a lot of different foods," she said. "If squash is perfectly disguised, children are not learning anything. Well, they are learning something, but it's not to like squash."
If neither repeated introduction nor hiding the vegetables works, and as long as a pediatrician is keeping an eye on the child's health, the experts suggest nothing more than patience.
"Unless it becomes a huge issue, it tends to be a little more fleeting than parents think," said Harriet Worobey, director of the Nutritional Sciences Preschool at Rutgers University. "I know a year can seem like five to parents, but these food jags are normal."
Hmmm...
I agree with this:
Quote:"We have to understand that biology is not destiny," said Patricia Pliner, a social psychology professor at the University of Toronto. "This doesn't necessarily mean there is nothing we can do about the environment."
I'd believe that there is predisposition, but I do think that there is a lot people can do about it.
Especially, I'm suspicious about this:
Quote:Most children eat a wide variety of foods until they are around 2, when they suddenly stop. The phase can last until the child is 4 or 5. It's an evolutionary response, researchers believe. Toddlers' taste buds shut down at about the time they start walking, giving them more control over what they eat. "If we just went running out of the cave as little cave babies and stuck anything in our mouths, that would have been potentially very dangerous," Dr. Cooke said.
I think it's likely that at that point they get pickier, sure, but I think it's parents'
response to that pickiness that locks things in.
My kid got terribly picky around there too, and it took a whole lot of work to get her through it. But she did get through it, and is now a neophile if anything. New and untasted = interesting.
This seems to be a new thing. I think there have always been picky kids but I know SO MANY kids who are outrageously picky. (A friend of hers would eat only orange foods -- except oranges. Another will eat only cheese pizza for dinner. Etc.) I just don't believe that kind of fickleness was -- or could have been -- indulged up until fairly recently.
i'd like to know how much autism is considered "on the rise" in the united states before making any comments on picky eating. it seems to be going up in correlation with the rising amount of vaccienes that children are given.
it's too early to assume causation here, but there are people that go through an entire childhood and much adulthood before realizing they have high-functioning autism or mild asperger's disorder. it can produce abnormal sensitivity to noise, light, touch, and taste. very bland foods (noodles for instance) can be a lot easier on a person than some foods we might consider entirely pleasant.
also, i read a very long time ago about taste buds changing in even more dramatic ways, something that causes green vegetables to taste like sewage to children, that is resolved in adults. this may or may not be related.
of course, it's possible that autism for instance, is just being reported more and more, hence the "rise" that seems to occur. and you could just as easily say the same about the "rise" in picky eaters, now that we're online and communicating with people all over the world, more cheaply than it used to cost to call one time-zone over in the same country. every generation seems to think the one follwing it is spoiled, i think the decline of "today's youth" is one of those themes that plato lamented.
I tend to agree with you, tinygiraffe, those are all things I've said a lot. (In fact I started to jump in re: autism/ vaccines, then read the rest of your post, thankfully.)
But I really do see a startling amount of extreme pickiness among my kid's friends (she's 7). Way, WAY more than when I was a kid. Whenever we eat with other adults, we get comments about how amazing it is that she'll eat whatever is put in front of her, and complaints about the ways in which their own kids won't do any such thing. (Although, now that she's been eating lunch with her peers every day, she's gotten pickier... sigh.)
To put it another way, I definitely had friends when I was a kid who wouldn't eat broccoli, or hated liver. But they had different meals every week -- there were far more foods that they WOULD eat than that they wouldn't. I keep running into these kids who will eat, like, 5 foods total.
i'm very suspicious about the alleged vacciene connection.
fact: some of the vaccienes in question contain a mercury based preservative with 4 times the amount of mercury the epa considers "safe."
fact: treating autistic children for mercury poisoning can reduce or eliminate the autistic symptoms.
fact: it would hurt the business of the people making the preservative (and thus i *imagine,* the people making the vacciene that choose the preservative in a business decision, over other alternatives if they exist,) if the "facts" added up to causation, opening them up for a decline in business, not to mention lawsuits.
none of these facts prove causation, and maybe there isn't one. they are just evidence. there are other facts that mitigate these facts, the genetic component being one. this suggests to me a genetic dispostion triggered by environmental factors like exposure to heavy metals. i'm no expert. at this stage, i'm not sure anyone is an expert. but correlation is still important to medicine, they discovered penicillin when they realized that milk maids seemed immune to smallpox. until we drew them out, there were no other facts about it.
What vaccine causation are you talking about? I agree with you about autism (I think, you seem somewhat conflicted). I don't think it's about vaccines.
However, I DO think that kids' natural inclination towards pickiness is currently being indulged at hitherto unseen rates -- which is the subject of this thread.
nevermind, i thought we were stepping into something we both had points to make about. originally, i went farther into my own view, giving you an opportunity to make your points about it.
only this was based on us being on the same page where we weren't. in that case, rather than traipse farther into my tangent, i'd like to trace back to the larger topic at hand, by saying i think there *might be* environmental or developmental reasons kids are more picky than they used to be that have nothing to do with the parents.
then, let's get back to your perspective/theory, respectfully, because i was attempting to mitigate it, not entirely refute it.
why would parents be more inclined to indulge picky eating now than any other generation? i'm trying to get to the bottom of your argument, i assume that either (or both) of us could be right.
Several reasons:
1. Because they can. When I say "until recently" I don't mean just the last few generations. I mean back to the beginning of humankind, since the last few generations are a blip, evolutionarily-speaking. It's only recently that there was always a wide variety of easily-accessible food available.
2. Because it's easier. Parents are rushed, mealtimes are rushed, and it's more difficult to deal with a wailing child who insists that he or she won't eat ___ or will only eat ____ than just opening the fridge and presenting the desired item.
3. Because kids are being marketed to. Kids get the same "I deserve it" marketing that everyone else does, increasingly so as they become an increasingly autonomous and powerful spending bloc.
Probably more, but I need to get going...
put that way, those are all factors worth serious consideration. i wanted to point out that it might not only be the parents, although you have the advantage of listing things that might be more universal and less recent.
another thing that might be worth pointing out is an article i read in the newspaper a few years ago, that talked about wisdom teeth. the idea is that we might be evolving to eat softer foods, without any reason but the fact that we've been growing whatever we want for so long.
this idea has the same weakness mine did, versus yours, but might help expand the understanding of "picky eating" as a result of agriculture (and livestock farming) itself.
after all, hunting and gathering is eating what you have. livestock farming and agriculture are growing what you want. perhaps picky eating has deeper cultural roots than we realize? as in, maybe it's part of not living an indiginous life. in that case, all our ancestors, let alone parents, are reinforcing it.
People will often turn their noses up at anything that's different, be it a new food, new activity, new job... When they're kids, you have to teach them to have an open mind in order for them to really give it a good try. And being sensible helps. I mean, if you want your kid to try Indian food, don't give them a spicy hot curry - introduce something mild. And if they don't like it, fine, but I'd get them to try another dish. All Indian food doesn't taste the same.
When my kids didn't like something, like a vegetable, I couldn't have cared less. That's completely understandable - it's a taste or texture they don't like. They didn't have to eat it if they didn't like it. But I would not have tolerated it if they got so picky they would only eat this or that. Too bad, so sad, this is what's for dinner.
I also don't believe parents should make their kids eat everything on their plates. And this goes double if an adult is dishing out their dinner. Every day your appetite is different so you're not going to eat the same amount each meal. Maybe today you want more chicken than corn, but tomorrow you want more corn than beef.
So much is made of kids' diets these days. Actually, I think too much attention and emphasis is placed on children altogether. I think some people forget that they're part of the family, not the pinnacle of it.
tinygiraffe wrote:put that way, those are all factors worth serious consideration. i wanted to point out that it might not only be the parents, although you have the advantage of listing things that might be more universal and less recent.
another thing that might be worth pointing out is an article i read in the newspaper a few years ago, that talked about wisdom teeth. the idea is that we might be evolving to eat softer foods, without any reason but the fact that we've been growing whatever we want for so long.
this idea has the same weakness mine did, versus yours, but might help expand the understanding of "picky eating" as a result of agriculture (and livestock farming) itself.
after all, hunting and gathering is eating what you have. livestock farming and agriculture are growing what you want. perhaps picky eating has deeper cultural roots than we realize? as in, maybe it's part of not living an indiginous life. in that case, all our ancestors, let alone parents, are reinforcing it.
Well, the reason given in the article makes sense to me in terms of the predisposition -- why it becomes an issue in the first place. That once kids are ambulatory and able to grab their own food (in the hunter-gatherer sense), they're primed to be more careful and go by their parents' cues. Not just grab and eat.
I just think that the predisposition is going in weird directions now that our food situation is so different from our ancestors'. That is, the hard-wired predisposition developed from a need to protect small children from dangerous foods (poisonous, rotted, whatever). That is now far less of an issue, and we have different sets of dangers, such as obesity.
In fact, I'm reminded of the quote from Atul Gawande that I've repeated so often, "We are a species that has evolved to survive starvation, not to resist abundance." Basically, that we evolved in one set of circumstances when it comes to food, and now find ourselves in very different circumstances.