0
   

Corpocracy corrupts Democracy

 
 
Reply Tue 9 Oct, 2007 01:38 pm
The most important issue to young people in the 2008 campaign is one that no presidential candidate will discuss. In fact, even touching on this subject is taboo for anyone with aspirations to Congress or the White House. Anyone who has the temerity to mention this political third rail will almost certainly lose the campaign.

The issue is the curtailing of corporate power, and as long as corporations continue to finance major candidates, it will remain unspoken. No one running for office wants to be blacklisted by corporate lobbyists in Washington.

That's a shame, because this issue is connected to almost every other problem facing America today. As long as corporations have no incentive to avoid polluting, we will continue to poison this planet at an alarming rate, and as long as corporate lobbyists hold an inordinate amount of influence in Washington, there will be no substantive solutions to problems like income inequality or our woefully inadequate healthcare system.

The unchecked power of American corporations does not just affect America, either. It is our corporations that are exploiting developing nations by employing their people at low wages in inhuman working conditions. The environment, obviously, is a global issue. And while some may scoff at the idea of the United States waging war for economic reasons, it is difficult to ignore the mounting evidence that we invaded Iraq, at least in part, to bring profit to American oil companies and defense contractors. What country is next? Iran?

If presidential candidates were willing to treat unchecked corporate power as an actual problem, we might be able to begin considering solutions. At a start, the regulations already in place to curtail corporate power could be enforced again.

More drastic measures need to be taken as well. I would start by changing the legal definition of a corporation. Currently, a corporation is legally defined as a human being, and therefore it possesses all the liberties that go along with being a member of the human race.

That definition is clearly absurd-a corporation is little more than a profit-making machine formed by a loose collective of human beings. It is not entitled to protection under the Fourteenth Amendment, or any other amendment of the Constitution for that matter.

Public financing of campaigns is also a central part of reducing corporate power in America. While public financing's detractors argue that it is fundamentally undemocratic, it will in fact bring America closer to the democratic ideal we purport to hold so dear.

There is much about the current campaign model that is fundamentally undemocratic, but nowhere is that more true than in the field of campaign finance. It is virtually impossible to run for Congress or the White House without becoming a corporate-sponsored candidate, and corporate-sponsored candidates act more on behalf of the corporations that pay to put them in office than the actual human beings that vote for them.

Public campaign finance will fix this by leveling the playing field and ensuring that candidates are selected based on their ability to present their case, not how much money they can raise from GE or Bechtel.

Additional regulation on corporations is also a must. While this includes environmental statutes, something that nobody seems to be discussing is how to regulate corporate America's human rights abuses abroad. In other words, if Nike is abusing workers in Indonesia, what can we in the United States do to make sure that ceases?

One possible solution is economic sanctions against our own corporations. America is a massive market, and many of the worst violators of human rights are based here, although their factories may be abroad. Why not close off the American market to these companies unless they adhere to some sort of international human rights standard?

One could argue that we have a moral obligation to do something like this, but it is not entirely without its own material rewards. This is a national security issue-to many developing nations, these corporations are the face of the United States, and the more people they abuse around the world, the worse the international perception of us becomes and the more potential terrorists and anti-American sentiment we breed.

In a campaign that is more about fundraising than real issues, unchecked corporate power is the elephant in the room. We cannot rely on the candidates to raise the issue-rather, we must raise awareness among Americans in the hopes that they will force the candidates to acknowledge this central problem in our democracy.
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/10/09/4430/
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 685 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
EmilyGreen
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Oct, 2007 02:16 pm
This is definatley food for thought! Thank you.

It IS a shame that money from special interest groups (including corporations) seems to almost completely control the actions of our governing body. There's a lot of room for improvement there.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Tue 9 Oct, 2007 02:24 pm
E G
I wish and I hope that American voters think deeply before they elect a person.
With poverty one can live
but not with disgrace and banal bla bla bla.
I will revive this post till the new one get approved
by the people, for the people.
Thanks for your views
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Wed 10 Oct, 2007 03:31 pm
Too many voters see only collusion between the powerful corporate and financial special interests and legislators with the burgeoning lobbying industry making the deals that leave out ordinary citizens.

As I noted after the disastrous 2000 election "Democracy Lessons for the USA " (IPS, Nov. 2000) our rigidly-controlled two-party duopoly, largely supported by contributions from similar corporations makes third parties unviable - unless led by billionaires like Ross Perot. Both parties control the TV debates, themselves "sponsored" now by corporations, no longer the grassroots League of Women Voters. Thus all these issues are polled and spun by political insiders and converge on a narrow set of slogans that avoid most of the deep domestic crises in the US: out-of-control fiscal and trade deficits, spiraling medical costs with 46% of our people without coverage and over 90,000 deaths annually due to medical mistakes; failing schools, skyrocketing costs of college; corporations reneging on health and pension plans; outsourcing of jobs and manufacturing, stagnant wages amid soaring corporate profits and the rising revolt against illegal immigration encouraged by corporate employers seeking cheap labor.

In a multi-party democracy, most of the issues find a party and are in play. In the US two-party duopoly, they are trumped by the sensationalizing of the "war on terror," fears over personal security, trivializing of values concerning family life and patriotism. Mainstream media, owned by a few huge conglomerates geared toward mass consumerism and corporate profits are at last, being end-run by independents on the Internet and in the blogosphere. Whether they and well-motivated, honest politicians can break through in the November elections or in 2008, remains to be seen. Many fear that the dysfunctional electronic voting machines, which over 80% of US voters must use can be hacked and many do not yet have the paper ballots which some states have mandated to allow voters to verify their ballots.

Clearly, systemic reforms of the US political system are essential and go well beyond regime change:

Reforming of campaign financing to make public financing the rule.

Returning to the requirements that all media licensed to use the public's airwaves, abide by the Fairness Doctrine and the Equal Time provisions of the Communications Act of 1934.

Overhaul and standardize elections nationally, abolish the Electoral College, require all election supervisors and officials to be unaffiliated to political parties; require all voting machines be transparent to voters and provide paper ballot receipts and make voting easier - or mandatory, as in Australia.

Reforming the inequitable and overly complex federal tax code to treat work and its income more fairly vis-à-vis profits and gains from capital investments.

Reforming the banking system to increase fractional reserve requirements (to reduce reckless lending) and require the Federal Reserve (our central bank) to use all the tools it has available to cool inflation (raising fractional reserve requirements, raising margin rates on securities purchases, encouraging more credit unions, etc) rather than relying solely on raising interest rates - or lowering them to avoid recessions.

Universal health care that is standard in all other major democracies and would reduce costs substantially.

New indicators to measure ecologically sustainable, equitable progress toward human development. These must be multi-disciplinary and go beyond money-denominated indices such as GNP and GDP. Many such new indicators are available, including the United Nations Human Development Report, the Calvert-Henderson Quality of Life Indicators for the USA and the many new indices of corporate, social, environmental and ethical performance (at www.EthicalMarkets.com).

These are some of the systemic reforms the next US regime must address.
http://www.hazelhenderson.com/editorials/regime_change_in_usa.html
0 Replies
 
EmilyGreen
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Oct, 2007 05:47 am
Ramafuchs wrote:
E G
I wish and I hope that American voters think deeply before they elect a person.
With poverty one can live
but not with disgrace and banal bla bla bla.
I will revive this post till the new one get approved
by the people, for the people.
Thanks for your views


The problem is that most people vote for the person who will help them right now instead of voting for someone who will help the entire country and its future. Most people in this country are just undereducated and selfish. Hopefully that will change.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Oct, 2007 11:14 am
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Corpocracy corrupts Democracy
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/13/2024 at 05:45:44