Non-Violent Resistence against injustice

"Gandhiji was in fact more revolutionary in his social and economic outlook than the so-called fire-brand revolutionaries who are out to change the world at a stroke. In his passion for egalitarianism he would yield place to none. And that is why he could say in his Constructive Programme: Its Meaning and Place:

"Economic equality is the master-key to non-violent independence…
A nonviolent system of government is clearly impossibility so long as the wide gulf between the rich and the hungry millions persists.
The contrast between the palaces of New Delhi and the miserable hovels of the poor labouring class cannot last one day in a free India in which the poor will enjoy the same power as the richest in the land.
A violent and bloody revolution is a certainty one day unless there is a voluntary abdication of riches and the power that riches give and sharing them for the common good." (p.18)

It may be worthwhile to recall what Gandhiji said:

"Whenever you are in doubt, or when the self becomes too much with you, apply the following test: recall the face of the poorest and the weakest man whom you may have seen, and ask yourself if the step you contemplate is going to be of any use to him. Will he gain anything by it? Will it restore him control over his own life and destiny? In other words, will it lead to Swaraj for the hungry and spiritually starving millions? Then you will find your doubts and … self melting away."

http://www.bestcyrano.org/THOMASPAINE/?p=200#more-200

The rich might echo Jesus: "The poor you always have among you." And fight to enforce it.

"History will have to record that the greatest tragedy
of this period of social transition
was not the strident clamor of the bad people,
but the appalling silence of the good people."

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr

4,000 Disrobed And Shackled Burmese Monks Detained By Junta, To Be "Sent Away" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

Yes Blueflame.
Both Indian Government and Dalai Lame shout with silence
Obviously because both are accustomed with injustice.

Gandhi cap still banned in jails
2 Oct 2007, 0110 hrs IST,Ananthakrishnan G,TNN
Print Save EMail Write to Editor




There couldn't be a better 'tribute' to Gandhi in times of Gandhigiri. Even in the 139th year of the Mahatma's birth, the country retains in its statutes a clause 'prohibiting' wearing the Gandhi cap, if only inside jails.

The prohibition is contained in the Punjab Jail Manual of 1916 which to date is applied for 'superintendence and management' of prisons in Delhi, Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh. Chapter 17, dealing with rules for prisoners admitted to Class A cells in the jails, it says "the wearing of political symbols such as the Gandhi cap and black pugree are (sic) strictly prohibited".

A colonial relic from the time the British tried desperately to purge nationalist upheavals, the prohibition only underlined the political significance of the Gandhi cap. Though the provision is not enforced in present-day India, the fact that it has managed to remain in the rulebook after 60 years of independence under regimes that all swore by the Mahatma is a stark reminder of how we still live with fossilised rules not of of sync with reality.

The jail manual is not anachronistic just about the Gandhi cap. It has several retrograde provisions like flogging of prisoners and allowing better facilities to European inmates.

Eyebrows have been raised before, but little has been done. The Supreme Court had expressed dismay with the manual as far back as 1978 with Justice Krishna Iyer calling for prison reforms.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Gandhi_cap_still_banned_in_jails/articleshow/2421141.cms

"Politicians inflame and manipulate the emotions
of the naive and ignorant by setting up
straw objects of hatred like religions, minorities, ethnicity, lifestyles etc.,
as Hitler's Germany,
Sharon's Israel,
Bush's America, Osama's Caliphate and
extreme Hindutva's India show. "

http://www.boloji.com/rt3/rt288.htm

They are advocates. We are leaders."


- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in regards to "Anti-war activists."


People of America, this is truly the problem with what was once a Representative Republic and now is a country run by "elected" officials who believe that they, individually and collectively, are above any accountability and are not answerable to their constituents. Our public servants erroneously believe that they are the leaders!

Ms. Pelosi made this statement to a group of reporters at a luncheon recently and she also went off on activists who have been participating in vigils outside of her chi-chi home in the Pacific Heights district of San Francisco. The people who are vigiling outside her house regularly, in a Pelosi Watch are only exercising their rights as American citizens to make their concerns known to a Rep who was elected from a district that is wholeheartedly against the occupation of Iraq and for impeaching the liars who got us into the illegal and immoral situation.

No, Ms. Pelosi, you are not a leader. You have proven time and again in what you laughably believe is a "mistake" free run as Speaker of a Democratic House that you will do anything to protect an Imperial Presidency to the detriment of this Nation and the world, particularly the people of Iraq and Afghanistan.

This Democratic Congress supported BushCo's disastrous and deadly surge; handed him over billions of their constituent's tax dollars to wage this murder; have by their silence and votes countenanced an invasion of another country; approved more restrictions on the rights of the citizenry to be protected against unreasonable search and seizure; Ms. Pelosi does not even know if "torture" (which violates international law and the 8th Amendment in our Bill of Rights) is an impeachable offense; and worst of all the impeachment clauses were taken "off the table" in an ongoing partnership with BushCo to make the office of the presidency a Congressionally protected crime conglomerate that is rapidly sending this Nation down a crap-hole of fascism. So, Congress has led us to a few things: war, poverty, oppression, unemployment, and an inexplicable continuance of the Bush Regime.

No, Ms Pelosi, you are not even a leader in the very narrowest of definitions. We do not elect our Congressional Representatives to be leaders, not to be used as willing marionettes for the war machine and other special interests that serve the elite to the detriment of the rest of us, but to represent the will of the people. We send our elected officials to DC and pay their salaries and subsidize their benefits to do the "Will of the People."

No matter how many times Ms. Pelosi and George Bush share tea and giggles and no matter how often she "prays' for him, George is not the Decider and she is only the Leader of the House of Representatives not the people. We are the sovereigns in this country and I tried to demonstrate this when I demanded a meeting with another haughty public servant: George Bush.

I cannot speak for every Democrat, Independent, Green or disenchanted Republican (and there are many) in America, but the consensus from my travels all over this country is that we put Democrats back in power in both Houses of Congress to be an opposition to the Bush Regime and to stop the annoying "bobble-headed, rubber-stamping" approval of all things criminal and murderous. We did not wish to keep heading in the same direction but desired to go another way, which would have required the Dems to finally step up and forcefully counter and stop the high crimes of BushCo. They have failed.

We are sick of excuses. We are tired of the blame being diffused on the Senate, the Blue Dog Dems, the Republicans or even, incredibly, the people of Iraq. A true leader accepts responsibility in ways that are not even dreamed of by BushCo or Congress Inc. A true leader would stand up and do what is intelligent and what is right and if he/she were a leader then people would follow. A leader does not wait idly by for a crowd of sycophants to gather around her before she does her job with integrity and courage; a leader leads the way and the Democratic Congress with an approval rating even lower than George's had better wake up to whom they need to follow: us!

We have countless examples of true leaders throughout American history and if not for them, women would not have the right to vote, much less be Speaker of the House; Black Americans would still be slaves or at the very least still drinking out of separate fountains; workers would not have the right to unionize and children would still be mining coal; we would still have troops in Southeast Asia, and we would still be under the aegis of our close Cousins in Empire: the British. Some of our courageous leaders have had to pay the ultimate price for their bravery and vision and Ms. Pelosi should be ashamed of arrogantly whining over her rubber chicken that Americans exist who want her to do her job because people are dying and lives are being ruined with her complicity.

We have the right to hold both of the political parties accountable. We not only have the right, we have the responsibility.

We not only have the right and the responsibility we have the power.
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=51&ItemID=14025

Nice!

Bookmark

I agree with the sentiment, if not the tone. I'm still hoping to see a viable third-party Presidential candidate in my lifetime and a Congress run by people who are not career politicians, but representatives of their constituency. Naive perhaps, but I've long felt that the days of the two-party system are past their prime.

JPB and Ami
I hope and wish that after this hollywood drama 2008 there will be a real democracy with high intellectual leadership.
I am fed up with this dancing dolls of the corrupt corporate controlled
L E A D E R S.
I hope there are some who think like me.
Regards and Respects