Re: Public Nudity
happycat wrote:agrote wrote:Is there any reason why public nudity should not be allowed?
Any reason??
I think this thread pretty much covers every single reason, and then some!
Does it really? Let's have a look at the reasons...
1. children
Public nudity should not be allowed because children. Well that doesn't make grammatical sense.
2. aesthetics
People mentioned skin cancer in strange places, people with colostomy bags, cellulite, tats, moles, warts, scars, birthmarks, stretchmarks and hair.
Are these things really uglier than obesity, facial disfigurement, or poor taste in clothing? If you do seem uglier, might that not be just because we aren't used to seeing them?
3. hygeine
We might have to change our habits. We could make public nudity legal, and then make it illegal to not keep yourself clean down under. But that might not be enough... perhaps underpants would have to be compulsory (although they could just hand out paper pants on the door at cinemas etc., so that you're free to walk to and from the cinema with your bits exposed.)
4. distraction
We'd get used to it.
5. cold weather
You'd still be allowed to wear clothes if you want to!
6. issues of sexual assault
We'd have to relax our attitudes towards genital contact, or contact with breasts etc. - it would be inevitable. But it would still be fairly obvious if somebody was deliberately groping somebody, or doing something worse. I'm not sure that the line between accidental contact and abuse would be too blurry.
--------------
So it appears that there are not many reasons why public nudity should remain illegal. I certainly can't see why toplessness should be illegal. And even full frontal nudity is something that I think we could adjust to (we could wear underpants for public seating).