1
   

John Kerry Does It: Breaks the Taboo with his challenge

 
 
Reply Sun 22 Jul, 2007 09:30 am
John Kerry Does It: Breaks the Taboo, and Shoves It Back Down Their Throats
by Paul Abrams
Posted July 20, 2007

I have been hoping, pleading, wishing that the issue of the war proponents not volunteering, that not a single member of the Bush family has volunteered, would rise to the surface. I have written about it on this site, and placed ads in Crawford, TX, newspapers when the White House Press Corps was in town to watch Bush clear brush while al-Qaeda plotted.

In "Ultimate Accountability: The Conspiracy of Silence", I pointed out why, namely that politicians and the MSM had an understanding that it would not be raised. Nonetheless, this is a very potent weapon, as I could personally attest having directly asked Jeb Bush and Bill Kristol those questions standing eyeball-to-eyeball, and, in both cases, noted the red-flushing of their faces and, in the case of Kristol, shouting "why should I, why should I?";and in the case of Jeb, turning on his heels and strutting away. Charlie Rangel said he introduced the draft proposal rather than confronting the subject directly. Charlie Rose wondered why to raise it? Howard Fineman, said "yeah, right."

John Kerry has done it. On Olbermann yesterday he said, "it is about time that those promoting this war offered up their own children to fight it, and anyone who themselves are 40 and under in the Congress and the Administration"...

This was in response to the letter Hillary Clinton received from Eric Edelman, former Cheney advisor, now in the Pentagon, and, according to Turkish newspapers, the absolute worst US Ambassador to Turkey in history. Edelman wrote that Clinton's letter asking what plans the Pentagon had for withdrawing US troops was, in effect, helping our enemies.

Democrats typically would slam the Administration for such accusations, thus succumbing to their invitation to join their argument. Indeed, that is what Hillary did in her response.

John Kerry did it better. He shoved it back down their throats so that they would choke on it. He also broke the taboo on calling for those voting and promoting the war volunteering themselves and having their own children go to Iraq.

This hypocrisy is NOT the major reason we should not have invaded to begin with, nor the main reason we should withdraw all our troops. It is, however, a potent weapon because it strikes at the most "reptilian" part of our brain: their fear conflicting with and overcoming their grand ideas of remaking the world so long as someone else took the risk.

Now, John Kerry has broken the taboo. Politicians, bloggers, and MSM -- repeat, repeat, repeat, repeat, repeat.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 564 • Replies: 15
No top replies

 
Avatar ADV
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jul, 2007 11:36 am
Don't challenge the concept of civilian control of the military lightly, my friend. The road that goes down is not one the Democrats are able to travel...

Also, that said, if you want to talk about "offering up your children" to military service, isn't that up to the children involved? Once you're eighteen, the decision to enter military service is yours - you sure as heck shouldn't be press-ganged into it just because your Dad is in Congress.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jul, 2007 12:12 pm
Avatar
Avatar ADV wrote:
Don't challenge the concept of civilian control of the military lightly, my friend. The road that goes down is not one the Democrats are able to travel...

Also, that said, if you want to talk about "offering up your children" to military service, isn't that up to the children involved? Once you're eighteen, the decision to enter military service is yours - you sure as heck shouldn't be press-ganged into it just because your Dad is in Congress.


Even with the draft, the wealthy and/or connected families managed to keep their children out of the military. It's an ancient pattern, even to the point of the wealthy paying poor young men to take their place in the military.

BBB
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jul, 2007 11:00 pm
Re: Avatar
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Avatar ADV wrote:
Don't challenge the concept of civilian control of the military lightly, my friend. The road that goes down is not one the Democrats are able to travel...

Also, that said, if you want to talk about "offering up your children" to military service, isn't that up to the children involved? Once you're eighteen, the decision to enter military service is yours - you sure as heck shouldn't be press-ganged into it just because your Dad is in Congress.


Even with the draft, the wealthy and/or connected families managed to keep their children out of the military. It's an ancient pattern, even to the point of the wealthy paying poor young men to take their place in the military.

BBB


Yeah but we don't have a draft. The rich and connected don't need to do anything to keep their children out of the military if they don't want to join.

The notion that only those serving or who have served can have an opinion on war & peace is nonsense.

Further nonsense is the notion that every one who has served is anti-war.

Yes, those that have served may have a different perspective and one which which we should take seriously, but it should not be conclusive or compulsive.

Unless you served BBB, by your implied argument, you should shut your virtual trap.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 09:18 am
Finn
Finn wrote: Unless you served BBB, by your implied argument, you should shut your virtual trap.

It might help if you rewired your brain.

BBB Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 09:49 pm
Having served or not is beside the point, except when chickenhawks are able to send someone else off to fight, while they totally avoid any sort of danger their entire lives. They can ingest a fine meal in their mansion, then sit back and pick their teeth, while planning the next move, which quite possibly ends in a series of deaths and, in a place like Iraq, with no measurable success to balance the equation.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 09:57 pm
Re: Finn
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Finn wrote: Unless you served BBB, by your implied argument, you should shut your virtual trap.

It might help if you rewired your brain.

BBB Rolling Eyes
yea! Rewire your brain butterhead!
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:01 pm
dunno about breaking the taboo. People called on the administration and their kids to join in the war from the beginning. I've heard many such calls. Perhaps not from a senator, though.
0 Replies
 
BlaiseDaley
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:12 pm
Will having a draft really end the war or just send the hard luck cases, who can't find a way around having to serve, off to continue more of the same?
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:13 pm
(Hey there, Norm!)
0 Replies
 
BlaiseDaley
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:17 pm
<Howdy do, ma'am>
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:20 pm
<Swell, swell. Yourself? Gee, we're completely invisible with these brackets here!>
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jul, 2007 09:40 pm
Re: Finn
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Finn wrote: Unless you served BBB, by your implied argument, you should shut your virtual trap.

It might help if you rewired your brain.

BBB Rolling Eyes


It might, but I doubt it. Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Twisted Evil Razz Laughing Very Happy Exclamation Idea Mad (emoticon ad nauseum)

Did you serve?

If not, then, by your standard, who cares what you have to say? Cool Confused Very Happy Shocked Twisted Evil

Respond to the comment through reason and not through the emotion that the comment might invoke. If you do, the rare BBB contribution predicated on BBB thought might hold some sway. Embarrassed Cool Sad Surprised :wink:

But then again, perhaps you can find an article that you feel best responds for you. Actually this would be quite a clever approach if you could pull it off, but thus far your fabula vomitus suggests no such degree of subtlty. Cool Cool Very Happy Very Happy Laughing Laughing Twisted Evil Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad
0 Replies
 
BlaiseDaley
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jul, 2007 02:48 am
dagmaraka wrote:
<Swell, swell. Yourself? Gee, we're completely invisible with these brackets here!>



<not so loud, we might be overheard>
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jul, 2007 02:58 am
subtity?
0 Replies
 
BlaiseDaley
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jul, 2007 03:06 am
No thanks, I'm full.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » John Kerry Does It: Breaks the Taboo with his challenge
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/16/2024 at 01:03:58