1
   

Y DO SUICIDES MURDER THEIR FAMILIES ?

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jul, 2007 02:36 pm
Montana wrote:
boy, I thought this would be a decent thread, but I should have known it would turn into putting guns in cvhildrens hand, David Rolling Eyes

Anyway, I haven't read all the responses, but I think some kill the family with thoughts of "If I can't have them, no one else can either"!

I picture one spouse telling the other controlling spouse that it's over and they're leaving. Controlling spouse loses it, can't imagine living without his family, decides to takes their own life, but not without taking their family with them.

Total uncut selfishness at it's most extreme.

Hi, Montana.
Well, the thread is about murder of one 's children ( in this case 7-year-old Mr. Benoit )
so u can see how defense from murderers fits in.
Whether he 'd live or die,
depended on whether he cud successfully defend himself.
He needed good equipment for that.

Do u attribute any significance to the murderer 's putting Bibles
next to his dead wife and son ?
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jul, 2007 02:42 pm
I don't know, David. Since there were bibles left I can only guess that there are religious reasons behind that.

I've always been interested in knowing what makes people tick, but sometimes it gives me a headache.

I do have to say that I do find you to be very interesting, David.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jul, 2007 02:46 pm
boomerang wrote:
Good point.

My brother has been a soldier for 30 years and has been in combat during several wars.
He is an expert marksman.

He doesn't allow guns in his house.

Including HIS OWN GUNS ?

During my military experience,
I was very aware of many, many different opinions about many things.

Having never MET the gentleman,
I have no information on Y or how he has arrived at whatever he believes.

Did he embrace the philosophy of pacifism ?
of not defending oneself ( nor one 's family ) from violence ?

like the Amish ?



I support his right to believe whatever he chooses to believe.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jul, 2007 03:09 pm
Montana wrote:
I don't know, David. Since there were bibles left I can only guess that there are religious reasons behind that.

I've always been interested in knowing what makes people tick, but sometimes it gives me a headache.

I do have to say that I do find you to be very interesting, David.

Thank u, Montana; very kind of u.

I join in that interest of what makes people tick.

There have been times that I have yearned to be able
to unscrew the cerebral vault of someone 's head
to look down in there and see what 's going on.
David
0 Replies
 
happycat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jul, 2007 03:25 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
HAPPYCAT,
did u see my answer to u, up above ?
Did u see my questions ?
David



happycat wrote:
Quote= omsigDavid:
Quote:
Its a matter of having the presence of mind
to soundly and logically plan for possible emergenies BEFORE thay occur.


Quote:
ah, there's the rub Davey. A child of 7 cannot do that.
If you had children, or knew anything about children (other than referencing your own bizarre childhood) then you would understand that children cannot, and do not, think abstractly.

I have to disagree with u, Happycat.

I can remember back to ( and before ) age 3
and I clearly recall my uncle telling me repeatedly not to argue
with my mother. In a sarcastic and negative way,
he repeated that I 'd be priceless as a lawyer.
That practice of frequent argument was in abstract thought,
day after day. The other kids by whom I was surrounded
were not very different than I was, and thay were NOT discernibly less intelligent.
We argued about what was right and rong, a lot.
Argument in the abstract represented NO PROBLEMS for us.

Indeed, as I said previously, at age 8, I felt a little ill-at-ease
in not knowing how I 'd defend my house, if I had to.
Hence, I felt very relieved, when I won a revolver in a poker game
with other kids in the neighborhood. This all entailed abstract thought.



David

P.S.
Following up on what u deemed " creepy " thoughts of mine,
Happycat, do u consider it " creepy " that from the age of 3 until 8
( before I had possession of any functional guns )
when I saw police in the street, my eyes fell on their guns and locked on.

I used to daydream of misappropriating not just the revolver,
but the whole rig that I had seen on police and on bank guards.
In other words, between ages 3 to 8,
I used to lie in bed and think about grabbing
a police officer's gunbelt with its gun and bandolier holding ammunition.

At that age I was not obsessed with guns;
( maybe semi-obsessed ).


Yes David, I've read your posts and your questions to me. Well, the ones that I could understand. I'm still trying to figure out what a "cud" has to do with anything.
As I said before, nothing that you've posted makes any sense at all to me.
Especially the parts about what you remember from when you were age 8 and under. Maybe you've just got a vivid imagination. But, if what you say is true, it would have been a wise decision on your parent's part to invest in a child psychologist.
I've got a mental picture of Pugsly Addams.....with a .38 in his hand.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jul, 2007 03:56 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Montana wrote:
I don't know, David. Since there were bibles left I can only guess that there are religious reasons behind that.

I've always been interested in knowing what makes people tick, but sometimes it gives me a headache.

I do have to say that I do find you to be very interesting, David.

Thank u, Montana; very kind of u.

I join in that interest of what makes people tick.

There have been times that I have yearned to be able
to unscrew the cerebral vault of someone 's head
to look down in there and see what 's going on.
David


You're welcome, David.

Now I must go check on my rotisserie. They can also have a mind all of their own.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jul, 2007 05:21 pm
happycat wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
HAPPYCAT,
did u see my answer to u, up above ?
Did u see my questions ?
David



happycat wrote:
Quote= omsigDavid:
Quote:
Its a matter of having the presence of mind
to soundly and logically plan for possible emergenies BEFORE thay occur.


Quote:
ah, there's the rub Davey. A child of 7 cannot do that.
If you had children, or knew anything about children (other than referencing your own bizarre childhood) then you would understand that children cannot, and do not, think abstractly.

I have to disagree with u, Happycat.

I can remember back to ( and before ) age 3
and I clearly recall my uncle telling me repeatedly not to argue
with my mother. In a sarcastic and negative way,
he repeated that I 'd be priceless as a lawyer.
That practice of frequent argument was in abstract thought,
day after day. The other kids by whom I was surrounded
were not very different than I was, and thay were NOT discernibly less intelligent.
We argued about what was right and rong, a lot.
Argument in the abstract represented NO PROBLEMS for us.

Indeed, as I said previously, at age 8, I felt a little ill-at-ease
in not knowing how I 'd defend my house, if I had to.
Hence, I felt very relieved, when I won a revolver in a poker game
with other kids in the neighborhood. This all entailed abstract thought.



David

P.S.
Following up on what u deemed " creepy " thoughts of mine,
Happycat, do u consider it " creepy " that from the age of 3 until 8
( before I had possession of any functional guns )
when I saw police in the street, my eyes fell on their guns and locked on.

I used to daydream of misappropriating not just the revolver,
but the whole rig that I had seen on police and on bank guards.
In other words, between ages 3 to 8,
I used to lie in bed and think about grabbing
a police officer's gunbelt with its gun and bandolier holding ammunition.

At that age I was not obsessed with guns;
( maybe semi-obsessed ).


Yes David, I've read your posts and your questions to me.

Well, the ones that I could understand. I'm still trying to figure out what a "cud" has to do with anything.
As I said before, nothing that you've posted makes any sense at all to me.
Especially the parts about what you remember from when you were age 8 and under. Maybe you've just got a vivid imagination. But, if what you say is true, it would have been a wise decision on your parent's part to invest in a child psychologist.
I've got a mental picture of Pugsly Addams.....with a .38 in his hand.


Did u understand the question about the colored font ?
U did not respond to it.

I here reproduce it for u:

" 3. Happycat,
I see that u write in the color blue.
I have also used colored fonts of different sizes
in an effort to express myself more clearly.

Have u received complaints from the residents of this forum
concerning your use of color ?


I did:
Some of the members pleaded, supplicated, entreated, begged
and implored my mercy, that I stop doing it.

Therefore, I am restraining myself to some limited degree.
I think your use of blue writing is pretty, colorful and ez to read.
David "
0 Replies
 
happycat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jul, 2007 05:26 pm
David - no, I've received no complaints. I post in blue because it matches my hair (see avatar.) :wink:

Possibly you get complaints because you use a lot of internet slang (U, Y, cud, etc...) you mix font sizes and you cut and paste a lot.
Your posts are difficult to read as they're all over the page, and some people don't have the patience to try and figure it all out.

jmho
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jul, 2007 08:29 pm
Thank u, Happycat.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 10:15:38