Tue 16 Jul, 2019 12:09 pm - On Golden Rice, I would encourage you to read what the International [i]Rice Research[/i] Institute says about it, rather than the World [i]Health[/i] Organisation.
IRRI are the guys who brought... (view)
Tue 16 Jul, 2019 09:49 am - [quote]What would it take for you to accept the consensus of the scientific community in a matter that doesn't fit with your political ideology?[/quote]
And what's your own answer to... (view)
Tue 16 Jul, 2019 09:24 am - You're being silly. I provided a link to a report substantiating the claim. I brought the horse to water, but it won't drink.
[quote]actually I provided a link debunking this claim... (view)
Tue 16 Jul, 2019 09:15 am - Well, if you claim that the theory that there would be no topsoil left in 60 years is ridiculous, then that's your claim, and you need to own it and will be expected to prove it. Just saying... (view)
Tue 16 Jul, 2019 09:10 am - 1. Total ideological BS. No government is opposed to olden rice is simply not good enough, as cultivars go, with yields too low to be a valid agronomic proposition. In general, the idea of... (view)
Tue 16 Jul, 2019 07:04 am - This works in theory but doesn't in practice. In reality, everybody has got an ideology, including scientists. Therefore it is materially impossible for science to be "independent of... (view)
Tue 16 Jul, 2019 06:59 am - Still, it is also bad science to reject a claim without studying it. Just because it 'sounds' superficially liberal doesn't make it untrue. In this specific case, googling where the... (view)