Sat 26 Apr, 2003 07:14 am - 10 points.
I'd give you more, but there seems to be preciously little information around on the prisoners. And Anything that can be found is generally hearsay. It's deeply worrying... (view)
Wed 23 Apr, 2003 09:27 am - when i say something debatable I try to put references in. I didn't do so when I said Iraq was armed and trained the Iraqis because I thought that was a fact everyone concedes. My books are... (view)
Wed 23 Apr, 2003 07:12 am - Perhaps Iraq and Afghanistan were test centers? To find out how to run social services and elections before applying it back home?
*hides* (view)
Wed 23 Apr, 2003 07:02 am - Ultimately I want to see the world war-free like (i believe) everyone). Lot's of different ways of going about that. One of which gives a possible criteria of the war. By invading and... (view)
Wed 23 Apr, 2003 06:44 am - http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/iraq_wmd/Iraq_Oct_2002.htm#01
Site is dated before the war, and suggests that although Saddam hasn't got nuclear capabilities, it may well have chemical... (view)
Wed 23 Apr, 2003 06:28 am - [quote="perception"]What is so infuriating about the Chomsky article is the total ommission of the actions of Russia and France in aiding the Saddam regime during the past 12 years----of... (view)
Tue 22 Apr, 2003 05:24 pm - Kara, I would have done but it was in a quick reply thing. Well, to be honest I probably wouldn't have - lazy by nature. :) (view)
Tue 22 Apr, 2003 12:54 pm - The above post was in reply to the missig one of Perc's, asking for weapons inspectors that support Scott Ritter, and saying that he'd noone has seen the guy's film (which I myself... (view)
Tue 22 Apr, 2003 12:50 pm - Sure I won't be believed, but just lost my post as I was submitting it and the list of supporters of the guy I made.
Raymond Zalinskas and Rolf Ekeus are two weapons inspectors that back the... (view)
