Dang, c.i. totally beat me to the punchline....
cicerone imposter wrote:This answer reflects your level of answers to all the participants in this discussion. c.i.
And your lack of answers reflects your level...
Hey, maliagar
Your arguments are dependant of creationist nonsense. Otherwise there is nothing to support all the arguments you are making. You are getting awfully close to name calling here.
Calling one Smartblythe isn't intended to provoke?
certain aspects of religion are irking me right now.
edgarblythe wrote:Calling one Smartblythe isn't intended to provoke?
What about calling one a creationist?
Anything to avoid the topic, hey?
littlek wrote:certain aspects of religion are irking me right now.
i have not seen anything actually dealing with religion on this thread other than Husker for quite a few pages.
Um, mal, aren't you a creationist?
Read my postings, and you'll find out.
littlek wrote:Um, mal, aren't you a creationist?
Is there such a thing as avoiding the avoidance? Just wondering.....
Gosh darn it! Frank, Repeat it for him once more, will you? c.i.
Mal, couldn't you be so kind as to answer a simple yes or no question?
Mal's positions cannot rest in a void. They depend on a variation of creationism to exist at all.
Dys, the thread has been off topic for - oh, about - eighteen pages. People have forgotten there was an original question. I like it that threads do not always have every single post related to the immediate question at hand, but this length off topic shows real forbearance at the extensive hijacking.
