Hi, there Mesquite.
Thanks for the link. Boy, you really hit the nail on the head with this:
Quote:I see our current situation as eerily similar to the Vietnamization plan of Nixon.
I wish Bush wasn't from Texas - he's an embarrassment!
But enough of that.
**********************
I've been studying deism and Thomas Jefferson so I can discuss it intelligently with TKO. I was shocked to encounter the following in the course of that study:
Quote:In 1779, Jefferson prepared a draft of Virginia's criminal statute, envisaging that the punishment for sodomy should be castration. The bill read: "Whosoever shall be guilty of rape, polygamy, or sodomy with a man or woman, shall be punished; if a man, by castration, a woman, by boring through the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch in diameter at the least."
So, we have to put these things in historical context, Mesquite. In Jefferson's day, that didn't seem so extreme. That doesn't mean that modern deists, like TKO, would embrace such a thing. If christianity couldn't progress socially, while still retaining the fundamental belief system, it would now be an historical footnote rather than a living and dynamic religious force in the world.
Obviously, christianity has been used and distorted by those with evil motives, but the truth usually comes to light - although, admittedly, it may take centuries to uncover a skillful fraud (segregation, the "curse of Ham", etc). The 17th century colonists didn't read their Bibles very carefully, because it doesn't say HOW to determine who is a witch!
Capital punishment - I stated earlier that I don't think Jesus would support it, and there's no solid New Testament Scripture that does so either.
The issue of women's rights is more complicated. I have been ignoring it here, because it's such a hot button issue, but I guess I'll have to deal with it sooner or later. It's late at night, I'm tired and I don't want to make stupid statements.
Suffice it to say, that I do support the traditional roles of the sexes because I feel it's basic to the survival of the traditional family as we have known it. I think I can make a cogent case on that narrow point - however, the definition of "family" has changed and the challenge we, as christians, face is to reconcile that reality with the Bible. Thankfully, this has little to do with the core doctrine of salvation and grace through Jesus, but it is important socially.
Our churches are full of people living "alternative" lifestyles these days. We don't want to reject them or drive them away. But, we do have to stand firm on certain basic principles of Christ's ministry and Paul's Epistles. This is difficult and painful. We're still sorting it out.
I realize this is a wishy-washy, and even cowardly, reply. But I'm still doing my own soul-searching here and that's the best I can do for now.
Jack