1
   

Who's Really 'Sicko'?

 
 
cjhsa
 
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 08:11 am
AT THE MOVIES

Who's Really 'Sicko'
In Canada, dogs can get a hip replacement in under a week. Humans can wait two to three years.

BY DAVID GRATZER
Thursday, June 28, 2007 12:01 a.m. EDT

TORONTO--"I haven't seen 'Sicko,' " says Avril Allen about the new Michael Moore documentary, which advocates socialized medicine for the United States. The film, which has been widely viewed on the Internet, and which will officially open in the U.S. and Canada on Friday, has been getting rave reviews. But Ms. Allen, a lawyer, has no plans to watch it. She's just too busy preparing to file suit against Ontario's provincial government about its health-care system next month.

Her client, Lindsay McCreith, would have had to wait for four months just to get an MRI, and then months more to see a neurologist for his malignant brain tumor. Instead, frustrated and ill, the retired auto-body shop owner traveled to Buffalo, N.Y., for a lifesaving surgery. Now he's suing for the right to opt out of Canada's government-run health care, which he considers dangerous.

Ms. Allen figures the lawsuit has a fighting chance: In 2005, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that "access to wait lists is not access to health care," striking down key Quebec laws that prohibited private medicine and private health insurance.

In the U.S., 83 House Democrats voted for a bill in 1993 calling for single-payer health care. That idea collapsed with HillaryCare and since then has existed on the fringes of the debate--winning praise from academics and pressure groups, but remaining largely out of the political discussion. Mr. Moore's documentary intends to change that, exposing millions to his argument that American health care is sick and socialized medicine is the cure.

It's not simply that Mr. Moore is wrong. His grand tour of public health care systems misses the big story: While he prescribes socialism, market-oriented reforms are percolating in cities from Stockholm to Saskatoon.

Mr. Moore goes to London, Ontario, where he notes that not a single patient has waited in the hospital emergency room more than 45 minutes. "It's a fabulous system," a woman explains. In Britain, he tours a hospital where patients marvel at their free care. A patient's husband explains: "It's not America." Humorously, Mr. Moore finds a cashier dispensing money to patients (for transportation). In France, a doctor explains the success of the health-care system with the old Marxist axiom: "You pay according to your means, and you receive according to your needs."

It's compelling material--I know because, born and raised in Canada, I used to believe in government-run health care. Then I was mugged by reality.





Consider, for instance, Mr. Moore's claim that ERs don't overcrowd in Canada. A Canadian government study recently found that only about half of patients are treated in a timely manner, as defined by local medical and hospital associations. "The research merely confirms anecdotal reports of interminable waits," reported a national newspaper. While people in rural areas seem to fare better, Toronto patients receive care in four hours on average; one in 10 patients waits more than a dozen hours.
This problem hit close to home last year: A relative, living in Winnipeg, nearly died of a strangulated bowel while lying on a stretcher for five hours, writhing in pain. To get the needed ultrasound, he was sent by ambulance to another hospital.

In Britain, the Department of Health recently acknowledged that one in eight patients wait more than a year for surgery. Around the time Mr. Moore was putting the finishing touches on his documentary, a hospital in Sutton Coldfield announced its new money-saving linen policy: Housekeeping will no longer change the bed sheets between patients, just turn them over. France's system failed so spectacularly in the summer heat of 2003 that 13,000 people died, largely of dehydration. Hospitals stopped answering the phones and ambulance attendants told people to fend for themselves.

With such problems, it's not surprising that people are looking for alternatives. Private clinics--some operating in a "gray zone" of the law--are now opening in Canada at a rate of about one per week.





Canadian doctors, once quiet on the issue of private health care, elected Brian Day as president of their national association. Dr. Day is a leading critic of Canadian medicare; he opened a private surgery hospital and then challenged the government to shut it down. "This is a country," Dr. Day said by way of explanation, "in which dogs can get a hip replacement in under a week and in which humans can wait two to three years."
Market reforms are catching on in Britain, too. For six decades, its socialist Labour Party scoffed at the very idea of private medicine, dismissing it as "Americanization." Today Labour favors privatization, promising to triple the number of private-sector surgical procedures provided within two years. The Labour government aspires to give patients a choice of four providers for surgeries, at least one of them private, and recently considered the contracting out of some primary-care services--perhaps even to American companies.

Other European countries follow this same path. In Sweden, after the latest privatizations, the government will contract out some 80% of Stockholm's primary care and 40% of total health services, including Stockholm's largest hospital. Beginning before the election of the new conservative chancellor, Germany enhanced insurance competition and turned state enterprises over to the private sector (including the majority of public hospitals). Even in Slovakia, a former Marxist country, privatizations are actively debated.

Under the weight of demographic shifts and strained by the limits of command-and-control economics, government-run health systems have turned out to be less than utopian. The stories are the same: dirty hospitals, poor standards and difficulty accessing modern drugs and tests.

Admittedly, the recent market reforms are gradual and controversial. But facts are facts, the reforms are real, and they represent a major trend in health care. What does Mr. Moore's documentary say about that? Nothing.

Dr. Gratzer, a practicing physician licensed in Canada and the U.S. and a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, is the author of "The Cure: How Capitalism Can Save American Health Care" (Encounter, 2006).
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 880 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 08:53 am
sicko
Whose really sicko?

You, apparently.

BBB
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 08:57 am
Another personal attack? No response to the article?

Nice....
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 09:20 am
cj, re ER access, you read recently no doubt about the woman who died screaming in agony after two days waiting in the ER waiting room in a hospital in LA? Recent surveys find we pay up to twice as much for care in the States and the quality of that care is not necessarily as high as in single-payer countries. "Sicko"'s right. It's broke. Fix it.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 09:41 am
Got a link? Was she waiting for all the illegal aliens who got priority?
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 09:51 am
No, she wasn't.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/13/health/main2923545.shtml

(depending on your AV, you'll have to temporarily enable pop-ups, since that's how CBS seems to work, or just google "woman dies in hospital waiting room")
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 09:56 am
That's a sad story, but I've said before, doctors kill far more people each year than guns do.

So, she died of a perforated bowel? It didn't say she had been shot or stabbed, just that she was vomiting blood. Interesting.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 10:05 am
A 6-12 hour wait in the ER is not unusual here. Been there, done that. At one point, following an auto accident, Bear waited a couple of hours and then went into the bathroom and was finally able to get the glass out of his eye himself.

I'm pretty much mixed on the debate. I was really upset talking to Cav about his care at the time in Canada.

I can see where limiting/ controlling costs and profits might degrade the quality of care and who enters the profession. And, I can see where some are over charging to the point of making it a hardship for many to recieve care at the hospital and insurance levels.

I've thought for a long time that there should be a limit on profits by insurance companies. What would happen if they were privately held rather than having to answer to stock holders?
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 10:52 am
What newspaper does the originating post come from?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 11:21 am
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010266
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 02:22 pm
In this area, at least, you don't go to an ER, you call the paramedics. They have to take one directly into the ER, and into a bed with immediate help from the nurses and doctors. Otherwise, I took my Mom a couple of time directly into the ER and we waited for over an hour.
0 Replies
 
Coolwhip
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 03:23 pm
cjhsa wrote:
That's a sad story, but I've said before, doctors kill far more people each year than guns do.


Guns don't kill people, doctors do.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Who's Really 'Sicko'?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 07:29:10