cjhsa wrote:Frank, do tell how you would prove to 25 million Iraquis that they were dead, without pictures?
My guess is that you are not going to PROVE to 25 million Iraqis that those brothers are dead by exhibiting those pictues.
The pictures don't look anything like the brothers -- although I have little doubt but that they are of them.
Obviously, while in hiding -- they tried to change their appearances as much as possible -- and I don't know how it looks to you, but to me, it looks as though they did a pretty good job of it.
And quite honestly, the results of the fire-fight did little, in my estimation, to enhance the resemblance to what they looked like while alive.
Humans being what they are, there will always be doubts.
My preference would have been to simply check out the identities with DNA references -- have individuals who knew them well (and who could see through the disguise changes and fire-fight reconstruction) -- and have them identify the bodies. Then publicize the identifications as much as possible.
It would not be completely effective -- but neither are the pictures -- and it would have the advantage of being a great deal more civilized.
In any case, I seriously doubt the death of the brothers or of Saddam himself when his turn comes -- will ease tensions in Iraq. I think things will get noticably worse. We are making the the mistake of thinking that because most of the world hated them -- the Iraqis, as a whole do too.
But I suspect they will see the slaughter of the brothers -- and any of the other high officials as ARABS BEING KILLED BY SATAN. In essence, I see revenge, rather than reassurance, being the end result.
We'll see.
But I hope my explanation made my concerns more palatable to you, cjh. I accept your explanation that you are just trying to stir up conversation and debate. That's an admirable thing. I've been know to do that from time to time myself.