0
   

Utopian society: is it possible and what would it take?

 
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 07:41 am
yes, ive been begging my work to update their damn computers, i cant handle this! k/b broken, fixed, lag, fixed, now my mouse is on crack. hooray.
0 Replies
 
akaMechsmith
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 06:22 pm
Study your economics and your history my friend.

What is wrong with you paying me for something that I have and you want Question

Whether it's my time, talent, or property your desire for it imparts a certain value to it. If it has is valuable to you then conversely it must be valuable to me. Without some sort of quid pro quo why should it ever change hands Question Therefore you will be bereft of something that may have much more value to you than me :cry

Unless you allow only your side to have guns, of course Exclamation But even that didn't work out too well for Lenin and Marx, not to mention a few million Poles and Ukrainians.

The Bolshevik Revolution was probably the most vigorous attempt towards Utopia that ever was. But the Communists had to control the guns. The Hutterites, Amish, and Mennonite comunities have to use a pretty vigorous God to keep them as a community of sorts.

Sorry, humans are not necessarily as I would wish them, but thats the way they are Exclamation
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 12:45 pm
OGIONIK wrote:
So its human nature how we are living now? i dont see any relevance to the topic, if we dont have to fight to survive, we wont fight.


What makes you think that the only reason for peopl eto fight is survival? I'd guess that more wars have been foufght and people have been killed due to boredom than over any survival need.

Quote:
Also i think the barter and trade system suits humanity the best, but our systems arent designed for it so it simply fails.


This is a silly argument that defeats itself. My knowledge and labor are "bartered" for currency which I can use to "barter" for whatever I need/desire. How is "the current system" not setup for it?

People who argue against using a common currency usually do so because they don't have anything (assets, skills or knowledge) that others are willing to pay them for. If someone isn't willing to pay you using currency, what makes you think they'd be interested in what you have to offer in trade for any other item of value?
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 12:50 pm
OGIONIK wrote:
Random thoughts: were native americans a utopian society? IMO they were extremely close.(not having advanced technology doesnt affect whether or not they were a utopian society btw) they didnt "work" they just kept the requirements for staying alive met, without a real government too. And whats funny is that all we have that they didnt is things that make life easier(computers etc..), we are no more better off than they were.


Really? We're no better off??

What was the average life expectancy of the average Native American in say... 1300??? I'd have to guess that it was probably in the mid to upper 20s.

I think most people would accept that 40+ years beyond that is a rather significant improvement in their lives.
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jun, 2007 12:49 am
Utopia can't be defined, as it is different for any two individuals, or indeed, the same individual on two different days.

Freed food, huh? Imagine telling a farmer there's a glut in every crop he has planted.

If there's plenty of food for all, forever... it's gonna get kinda crowded.
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jun, 2007 01:27 am
good points.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jun, 2007 07:12 am
I can't believe you suggested that the Amerindians enjoyed a Utopian society. On the mainland of North America, yeah, the men laid around growing a spare tire around their waists, but the women worked their asses off from dawn to dusk, and from adolescence to an early death. I guess Utopia, in your view, applies only to the guys.

In the Islands of the Caribbean, the Arawak had life pretty easy--if you ignore the regular raids by the Caribs, during which time they rounded up women if they felt they wanted more, and they killed and ate as many of the men as they could get their hands on.
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jun, 2007 07:21 am
and am i to assume you are grouping all american tribes together?

O_o

i wont do that. which will make both of our arguments valid.
Yeah threads done for, utopia is impossible, because overcoming human greed is impossible.

A lot of talking for such a simple answer!
0 Replies
 
VSPrasad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Jun, 2007 09:00 pm
Ancient Europeans wrote about Ages of Man

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_Man

There are also many other references to various
types of world ages or Ages of Man in Hopi
(worlds), Mayan (suns) and other cultures of
antiquity. Giorgio de Santillana, the former
professsor of the history of science, mentions
approximately thirty ancient cultures that
believed in the concept of a series of ages and
the rise and fall of history, with alternating
Dark and Golden Ages.

More details about them is found in the Yuga concept of Hinduism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuga
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saty_Yuga

Only during Golden Age or Krita Yuga, there will be no wars
and humans live with highest peace. It is not possible to
create an Utopian society in other ages.
0 Replies
 
vikorr
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Jun, 2007 11:49 pm
Where is the meaning in life if all things are free?

And who is going to work to provide all these free things?

What value will we place on free things?

What happens when there is an ownership dispute of 'free' things?

Who is going to control the distribution of all the free things?

What happens if certain free things are in limited supply?

etc
0 Replies
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2007 10:25 am
Cyracuz wrote:
A utopian society cannot be achieved by simply providing adequately for everyone. There is no real shortage of anything, however unevenly distributed.

It does sound a cliche, but the key to a utopian society is peace on earth. And it cannot be achieved by a war to end all wars. The only way is for every last one of the individuals inhabiting this planet to look into themselves and find the seed that breeds, and then pluck it like a weed. Fear is the key. It makes us justify all sorts of terrible actions and laws that in turn create the troubles we have today.


Cyracuz:

Good points.

IMHO - the "seed that breeds" is selfishness!
0 Replies
 
vikorr
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2007 07:54 pm
Selfishness? A balanced selfishness is necessary to utopia. If you don't have any selfishness, then you don't have a sense of self, and where is the utopia in that?

Conquering unhealthy fears isn't possible either, because this type of fear is based on lack of knowledge & understanding. Our knowledge of others can never be complete, and the 'understanding' that flows from what we do 'know' is often misinterpreted by us (ie wrong), due to our differing experiences, values, character, environment, influences, norms etc. Of course we can only try our best Smile
0 Replies
 
aperson
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jul, 2007 02:24 am
Seriously???

Utopia - no place

Utopia is a perfect society - and we're always going to be want improvments.

To me the only utopia would be a single human in cryostasis looked after by a ridiculously intelligent computer sapience which is bashing up the rest of the universe.
0 Replies
 
spidergal
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jul, 2007 04:13 am
A Utopian society would require all humans to possess enormous and infallible wisdom.
0 Replies
 
vikorr
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Jul, 2007 11:55 pm
Quote:
Utopia - no place


Utopia exists in my mind from time to time.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 12:13 am
Setanta wrote:
Given that you'd have to be able to repeal human nature--no, it's not possible.


Set beat me too it.

The nature of man (violent, self-destructive) makes Utopia impossible. We would invent war in Utopia.

That we wittness so much violence and self-destrution has us wondering at Utopia.
0 Replies
 
vikorr
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 12:56 am
Quote:
The nature of man (violent, self-destructive) makes Utopia impossible.


It makes a utopian society impossible, not utopia itself.
0 Replies
 
carrie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 12:59 am
A utopian society would be everybody looking out for each other, working hard to create the society together, and getting rid of selfishness. It does not mean perfection would be achievable in my eyes but rather that we could achieve something through honesty and compassion
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 03:19 am
carrie wrote:
A utopian society would be everybody looking out for each other, working hard to create the society together, and getting rid of selfishness. It does not mean perfection would be achievable in my eyes but rather that we could achieve something through honesty and compassion
Yes, but we can't agree on what Utopia is or should be and that is were the trouble starts. For instance, Who runs Utopia and how do we run it? Do we have laws? Who makes the laws? Who enforces the laws?

The complications of Utopia put us right back where we started.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jul, 2007 03:24 am
vikorr wrote:
Quote:
The nature of man (violent, self-destructive) makes Utopia impossible.


It makes a utopian society impossible, not utopia itself.
Utopia (from Greek: no, and, place, i.e. "no place" or "place that does not exist")

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utopia
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.43 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 06:48:28