Apparently 1 in 12 people is gay so it puts one of his disciples in the running.
THREE PROOFS THAT JESUS WAS JEWISH:
1. He went into his father's business
2. He lived at home until the age of 33
3. He was sure his mother was a virgin, and his mother was sure he was God
Jesus (or someone else, for that matter) was gay?
Who cares?
Sheesh!
A guy who thinks Jesus is a figment of the imagination now imagines he must have been gay.
What next?
Plus, you know, he wept, and stuff.
Everyone knows real men don't even cry, much less weep.
So, like, while I'm not sure he was gay or anything he certainly was kind of a sissy or something.
Look, until you can supply me with proof that Jesus baked a bundt cake for the Pharisees (or anyone else for that matter) or made cupcakes with either pink or lavender icing on the birthday of each Disciple, I will not believe that he ever was part of queerity.
No, it ain't gonna happen.
neologist wrote:What next?
The field of possible is infinite:
Pedophile - Let the little children come to me - Mathew 4:4.
Necrophilic - he came from the dead.
Involved in bondage - The meek will inherit the earth...
Francis wrote:neologist wrote:What next?
The field of possible is infinite:
Pedophile - Let the little children come to me - Mathew 4:4.
Necrophilic - he came from the dead.
Involved in bondage - The meek will inherit the earth...
Whatever one can imagine?
neologist wrote:Francis wrote:neologist wrote:What next?
The field of possible is infinite:
Pedophile - Let the little children come to me - Mathew 4:4.
Necrophilic - he came from the dead.
Involved in bondage - The meek will inherit the earth...
Whatever one can imagine?
Well, that's what you do when you're inventing a new church, so why not?
Jesus: "Get thee behind me, Satan."
Need I say more?
He may have been gay, but he certainly wasn't a christian.
jespah wrote:According to my cousin S___, the two are not mutually exclusive.
Oh!
You may be right at that!
It's Indians, isn't it? There are no gay Indians. Someone at work assured me of this in the past week!!!
kitchenpete wrote:margo wrote:jespah wrote:According to my cousin S___, the two are not mutually exclusive.
Oh!
You may be right at that!
It's Indians, isn't it? There are no gay Indians. Someone at work assured me of this in the past week!!!
Tell that to the prince!
Yep - used The Prince as an example - but - apparently there are no gay Indians! I must have been wrong!
Jesus apparently never met the chick in the bikini that keeps showing up on the right side of A2K.
Jesus H. Christ!
This is, of course, a meaningless thread. It matters not one bit what Jesus' sexual orientation was. His social-ethical teachings are all that matter.
JLNobody wrote:This is, of course, a meaningless thread. It matters not one bit what Jesus' sexual orientation was. His social-ethical teachings are all that matter.
I beg to differ.
Since millions of Christians explain away glaring contradictions between Old and New Testaments by the "Jesus Trumps All" arguement, if Jesus really was a smoker, then it would force the Christians to send Old Testament denouncements of homosexuals to the dustbin. Jerry Falwell built a movement of hate against homosexuals by invoking the Old Testament. So, if we could unearth scriptural evidence that he liked the boys... well... it would muzzle at least a few of the right wing nuts we live on this planet with.
I see your point, but in the case of Jesus, I would confine myself to his teachings rather than his deeds. And the only way to deal with the Falwells and Robertsons is to ignore them. I would never dignify their drivel with counter agruments.
