1
   

How Monet's cataracts coloured his view of the lilies

 
 
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 10:08 am
How Monet's cataracts coloured his view of the lilies
By Jonathan Brown
Published: 16 May 2007
Independent UK

Monet's series of paintings depicting the dappled light playing across the water-lilies at his home in Giverny are considered some of the finest works by the French Impressionists.

But new research suggests the famously blurred effect achieved by the master's brush strokes may have been a literal representation of how he saw the world.

Monet's deteriorating sight, caused by the onset of cataracts, has long been the subject of speculation by art historians. A computer simulation carried out by an ophthalmologist at Stanford University has now cast new light on the state of Monet's vision and the effect it had on his work.

According to Professor Michael Marmor, the artist's failing sight was a source of frustration to him in the early decades of the 20th century. "He wrote letters to friends, [complaining] how colours were getting dull, and it was hard to tell them apart, and how he had to label tubes of paint," Professor Marmor said. "He was very vocal about how his failing eyesight was affecting him."

Monet's cataracts caused the lens of his eye to become denser and more yellowish. One immediate effect was to blur colours and reduce their intensity. "It was getting harder for him to see," Professor Marmor said. "[His eyesight] was getting blurrier, but he was probably more bothered by the progressive loss of colour vision."

The academic has illustrated how Monet's worldview changed by altering a photograph of his 1899 painting of the ornamental Japanese bridge in his garden. The adjusted photo shows that as the artist's sight got worse, so the bright, floral shades of pink and blue disappeared, leaving muddier browns, reds and yellows. The study, published in the Archives of Ophthalmology, argues that two later paintings of the bridge with strong red-orange and green-blue tones would have appeared almost identical to him.

Monet eventually had surgery in 1923 - just three years before his death from lung cancer at the age of 86. But afterwards he complained incessantly that his sight was first too yellow and then too blue. He destroyed much of the work he completed while suffering cataracts and the few pieces that survive were rescued by family or friends. When Monet eventually went back to painting, he completed the lily series that now hangs in the Orangerie.

Professor Marmor has also examined the life and work of the painter Edgar Degas, thought to have suffered from maculopathy - a condition which seriously affected his central vision. The evidence could force a dramatic reappraisal of both artists' work, he believes. "I think it points out very dramatically some physical limitations that they had, which limited their ability to paint."

But Chris Riopelle, curator of 19th-century painting at the National Gallery, said: "It does not entirely answer the questions - after surgery, Monet's style did not alter radically."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,275 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 04:54 am
I have often wondered if Goya had astigmatism...
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 05:26 am
And I, if Picasso had strabismus..
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 05:39 am
From yesterday's [London] Evening Standard (late Westend final, page 17)

http://i14.tinypic.com/6byh501.jpg
http://i12.tinypic.com/4lpwevp.jpg

http://i8.tinypic.com/6hei6mq.jpg
0 Replies
 
material girl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 05:39 am
I saw a pic in th epaper, very interesting.
Must be the only time losing your sight is of major benifit to the world of art.
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 10:48 am
El Greco certainly had quite severe astigmatism.
0 Replies
 
Vivien
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2007 04:04 pm
There's a very good book on the subject of artists and eye problems by an Opthalmologist that I read a few years ago. The World through Blunted Sight (or was it Vision?)

link

He talked about Monets vision problems - Monet was also short sighted for all his life. He was given glasses but threw them away as he hated seeing 'like Ingres' The short sightedness was what made him simplify, rather than the cataracts, which of course he only had late in life.

he destroyed a lot of paintings he'd done when his cataracts were bad - when they were operated on and he saw the paintings he'd done during that period, he hated them. Cataracts affect the way the eyes see colour and absorb (I think) blue so all his pictures done during that brief time had a strong colour cast as he overcompensated.

The author suggested reasons for lots of other quirks in artists work but wasn't dogmatic about it, merely saying it was a possibility. It was fascinating
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Jun, 2007 01:42 am
Back in the day my drawing instructor would get mad at me for not wearing my eyeglasses (I'm myopic) to draw. I'd argue with her that I was drawing what I was seeing, she wanted me to see "correctly" what I was drawing.

I should have banged her.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » How Monet's cataracts coloured his view of the lilies
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 12:22:36