0
   

Abortion discussion

 
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 02:03 pm
I understand boom.

I'm not saying if I'm pro-life or pro-choice, I'm just not going to go there.

It just seems adoption is rarely put forth as an option is discussions like this.

When I said thanks, I meant more for opening that vein.



I will say adamantly I am oppossed to the barbaric practice of partial birth abortions. When discussing abortions, I worry where people will eventually draw the line....first trimester, 2nd, 3rd....8 months and 14 days?

Why not call a C-section a partial abortion for all the difference in viability.

Again, I'm not comfortable in admitting if I'm Pro-lfe or Pro-choice, but this drawing mildly puts how I feel about partial birth abortions. A person could put a blanket around this baby, take it home and it would be totally fine.

http://www.standardnewswire.com/images/1178628271.jpg
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 02:07 pm
Partial birth abortion is something I cannot imagine anyone being able to do. Not even the mother, who doesn't see what's going on but the doctor who does it. What kind of person does that require??
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 02:34 pm
Coolwhip wrote:
This may sound a bit insensitive, but why should the father be forced to pay for the child for 18 years if he himself does not want it? There are a lot of cases where women tell the man they are on the pill etc. even though they are not.

I know that forcing an abortion is inhumane and out of the question, but in many ways the woman seems to have to upper hand here. Financially, that is.


Tough luck, Coolwhip! Contraception is not only for women, in case
you haven't considered this yet. If you don't protect yourself, you're in
for the money, should she get pregnant and keep the baby.
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 02:40 pm
Bella Dea wrote:
Partial birth abortion is something I cannot imagine anyone being able to do. Not even the mother, who doesn't see what's going on but the doctor who does it. What kind of person does that require??


I don't know bella, I just don't know.

I could sit here and shake my head all day in wonderment at who could do this.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 02:42 pm
Yes, Chai and Bella, I know what you're saying.

But I can't imagine being told a child I'm near delivering is anencephalic either.

Would I chose a late term abortion in that instance?

It's very possible that I would.

Are there other situations where I would consider it?

Quite possibly.

I've never had to make such a hard decision and I don't think that the women who do or the doctors that they see are monsters.
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 02:47 pm
When I was around 16 weeks, I was asked if I wanted a series of tests to determine the chances of a life threatening disease or abnormality in the baby. The doctor said in cases like this, they could terminate up to 28 weeks. 28 WEEKS! That is where I am right now!!!!

I declined.

Why? Because it wouldn't matter.

I'd rather deliver a stillborn than kill my baby.
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 02:51 pm
And just think of the people who would abort knowing that their child had downs. Is that right?

Abort because the child will be challenged and cause you a challenge?

The only test I had was to say "yes" or "no" that the pregnancy was progressing normally.

I wouldn't have bothered with the other tests to tell me if the "abnormality" was fatal of just a possibilty or just an inconvenience.

I don't judge these women for wanting an abortion....but why wait so long to have one? And if your baby is going to die anyway, why not let nature take it's course instead of being the one to murder your baby? I understand the very real emotional trauma that having a baby die in utero...but what kind of person can just say "kill it"? What can you avoid by being the one to murder your own baby?
0 Replies
 
Coolwhip
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 02:53 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
Coolwhip wrote:
This may sound a bit insensitive, but why should the father be forced to pay for the child for 18 years if he himself does not want it? There are a lot of cases where women tell the man they are on the pill etc. even though they are not.

I know that forcing an abortion is inhumane and out of the question, but in many ways the woman seems to have to upper hand here. Financially, that is.


Tough luck, Coolwhip! Contraception is not only for women, in case
you haven't considered this yet. If you don't protect yourself, you're in
for the money, should she get pregnant and keep the baby.


I think the whole idea that women "own" the child because she is the one carrying it for 9 months of her life. The man is effectively reduced to a sperm donor.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 02:54 pm
Only if he chooses to play that role, Coolwhip.
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 03:11 pm
Bella Dea wrote:
And just think of the people who would abort knowing that their child had downs. Is that right?

Abort because the child will be challenged and cause you a challenge?


I wouldn't have bothered with the other tests to tell me if the "abnormality" was fatal of just a possibilty or just an inconvenience.

....but why wait so long to have one? And if your baby is going to die anyway, why not let nature take it's course instead of being the one to murder your baby? I understand the very real emotional trauma that having a baby die in utero...but what kind of person can just say "kill it"? What can you avoid by being the one to murder your own baby?


These selected sentences say a lot of what I'm thinking.

Partial birth....birth...meaning the baby can feel what is happening to it, and has thoughts about it.

Why wait so long? That is an excellent question. Is there any condition that can only be recognized right before the baby is born?
0 Replies
 
Coolwhip
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 03:16 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
Only if he chooses to play that role, Coolwhip.


I'm not saying I don't sympathize with single mothers, because I do.
But I think there should be more equality between the sexes in this
matter, people just assume the men are heartless beings that couldn't
care less what happened to the child.

The same goes when the woman performs an abortion, she doesn't
have to consult the father. Now this is just the natural order of things
but that doesn't mean it's not hard on the father.

I realize this is sort of beond the pont, since I initially argued that the
man shouldn't have to pay child support. But my point is that the father
should have some sort of say in all of this, and not be forced to sit
on the sideline.
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 03:17 pm
So coolwhip....they shouldn't have to pay....but they should have a say?
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 03:26 pm
Coolwhip wrote:
CalamityJane wrote:
Only if he chooses to play that role, Coolwhip.


I'm not saying I don't sympathize with single mothers, because I do.
But I think there should be more equality between the sexes in this
matter, people just assume the men are heartless beings that couldn't
care less what happened to the child.

The same goes when the woman performs an abortion, she doesn't
have to consult the father. Now this is just the natural order of things
but that doesn't mean it's not hard on the father.

I realize this is sort of beond the pont, since I initially argued that the
man shouldn't have to pay child support. But my point is that the father
should have some sort of say in all of this, and not be forced to sit
on the sideline.


Well, mostly couples decide together if they opt for an abortion or
carry the baby to term. What you're basically referring to is a situation
of ONS or if the couple doesn't know each other well, and she makes
a decision that is not to his liking. Ideally, if you were close enough to
make love, you should be close enough to consider the possibilities,
in case she does get pregnant. If you have unprotected sex and do
not consider the options, you clearly are inept to make a life altering
decision either.
0 Replies
 
Coolwhip
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 03:30 pm
Chai wrote:
So coolwhip....they shouldn't have to pay....but they should have a say?


Haha, no, of course not. I just think that the current system favours the mother unreasonably, and this can seem a tad unjust to some. Perhaps the amount of money paid in child support should be determined on a case-by-case basis. Mind you, there are women out there taking advantage of the system.
0 Replies
 
Coolwhip
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 03:43 pm
CalamityJane wrote:

Well, mostly couples decide together if they opt for an abortion or
carry the baby to term. What you're basically referring to is a situation
of ONS or if the couple doesn't know each other well, and she makes
a decision that is not to his liking. Ideally, if you were close enough to
make love, you should be close enough to consider the possibilities,
in case she does get pregnant. If you have unprotected sex and do
not consider the options, you clearly are inept to make a life altering
decision either.


Perhaps I was a but unclear, because this is the situation I was referring to. My point is that the woman has the power to keep the baby, the man then unwillingly has to pay child support for the next 18 years of his life. One moment of drug-induced passion and your economy can take a serious turn for the worse. The mother, however, has weeks and months to consider what option to take. Or perhaps the father wants to keep the baby, in either case, he has no options, only responsibilities.

Don't you see an unbalance of power here?
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 03:50 pm
Coolwhip wrote:
One moment of drug-induced passion and your economy can take a serious turn for the worse.


Yes I can understand that, but my compassion is quite limited here, sorry.

Quote:
The mother, however, has weeks and months to consider what option to take.


Trust me, she won't take this decision lightly, especially if she cannot count
on the "father" to be there.

Quote:
Or perhaps the father wants to keep the baby, in either case, he has no options, only responsibilities.


He'll share the responsibilities with the mother if she decides to keep the
baby.

Quote:
Don't you see an unbalance of power here?


Frankly, no!!
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 03:51 pm
how about if the father has the total responsibility for the care of the child for nine months... now the playing field is even., Mom carried it, dad 100% took responsibility for it for an equal amount of time. then if the mother insists on having full custody she gets full responsibility. If the father has say 15% visitation then he pays 15% of the childs expenses, and gets to make 15% of the decisions throughout the childs lifetime.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 03:53 pm
in any discussion concerning abortion or parental rights a woman will always reduce a man to a sire, a sperm donor, while elevating herself to Madonna status rather than considering perhaps she might merely be an incubator and milk manufacturer.
0 Replies
 
Coolwhip
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 03:57 pm
CalamityJane wrote:

Trust me, she won't take this decision lightly, especially if she cannot count
on the "father" to be there.
!


The "father"? He is no more "father" than she is "mother".
0 Replies
 
Coolwhip
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 04:00 pm
CalamityJane wrote:

Quote:
Or perhaps the father wants to keep the baby, in either case, he has no options, only responsibilities.


He'll share the responsibilities with the mother if she decides to keep the
baby.


No, I meant if the mother wants an abortion and the father wants to keep it. The child still has dna of the father.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 09:54:23