1
   

SAFETY FROM VIOLENT DEPREDATIONS

 
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 May, 2007 12:57 am
OmSigDAVID wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Which is actually rather tame... My Russian girl friend said she was the fastest in her class at tearing down and reassembling a Kalashnikov... but she was no good at throwing the potato (grenade practice). Shocked

Which class ?
Was it child or adult ?
Don't know or remember, but the impression I got have is around 12 years old, in Soviet Ukraine.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 May, 2007 01:42 am
[quote="aidan

Quote:
Even in the absence of contact,
if a child in the audience of a movie
saw Shirley Temple, or one of the " Our Gang " kids,
maybe Spanky or Alfalfa,
who became the object of amore,
is the one in the audience a pedofile ?


Quote:
Laughing I think I'd call that a crush- wouldn't you?

Will u define your term ?


Quote:

But I'd think of it more as experimentation,
unless one child was forcing another, or manipulating a situation,
then he'd be a rapist as well.

Quote:
But I think as society views pedophilia in its criminal form the reason it is invested with so much disgust
and judgment is because of the unequal distribution of power.

OK: if a 10 year old with a knife or a gun
rapes a 21 year old movie actress,
does that make him a pedofile ?

Quote:
No, that'd make him a rapist, and not even a child rapist as the victim is an adult. (Although because he's a child maybe he'd be called a child rapist- complicated isn't it)?

Reminiscent of my ex-girlfriend, Marilyn who used to scream
when her 4 year old daughter pulled her hair, or hit her.
That was child abuse.







Quote:

But the word pedophile is so misleading.
When you hear bibliophile or Anglophile or Francophile- those all have
positive connotations in that they speak to a relationship in which the
lover of books, England, France is enacting an interest or affection for
something positively- whereas in pedophilia, it's not positive in any way-
really for either party. Although the person acting may feel fulfilled,
really with every experience s/he's sinking deeper into an unspeakably
evil morass that will only entrap him or her and make it harder and
harder for that person to lead a normal healthy life- not to mention what
it does to the child. And it's not about love at all. It's about control and sickness.

I think we should give it another name.

It sounds like it means foot lover;
( like pedestrian ).






Quote:
Quote:

An adult who is a sexual being acting out his or her sexual urges
on a child who does not have the same urges or even any understanding
of what is happening is a much more disturbing scenario than two
children of equal size, age and sexual development.

Children in elementary school
have been arrested for raping their fellow students, in school.

Quote:
Really? I believe you, but I'd be interested to read about it.
Can you cite a specific case or give details? How old was the rapist?
How old was the victim? What was the sentence for the perpetrator? That's pretty scary to think about.

I 've read about that happening a few times,
in recent decades, in the Daily News; try Google.



Quote:
We did a lot of that in school.
I saw no difference in noise between 5th graders sitting in class,
listening to the teacher, and college students or law students.

Quote:
Wow- you guys must have been some mature fifth graders. Seriously- I know I behaved very differently in my fifth grade class than in my college lectures. I even got kicked out of the classroom and had to stand outside the door in the hallway a couple of times in fifth grade (always for talking, being silly and fooling around).

At all ages in school, there was occasional cross talk.
That is to be expected; so what ?






Quote:

I can remember my fifth grade teacher (he had quite a temper)
throwing a math book and chalk and an eraser at various kids in my fifth
grade class at various times to get them to be quiet.

Someone shud have sued him for assault n battery.






Quote:
In MY observation, thay all just sit there, take notes n listen;
maybe ask a question, occasionally.
( I was full of questions, at ALL ages. )

Quote:
Sounds like a fifth grade teacher's version of utopia.

It never OCCURRED to us to do anything else.
What else is there to do, except fall asleep ?







Quote:
However, I will not venture to comment upon
the impulse control of people of ANY age.
( How old were Stalin, Hitler n Pol Pot when THAY ran amuk ? )[/b][/color]

Quote:
Did I already tell you about the radio play I heard about what might have happened if Hitler had received analysis from Freud- how world events might have been changed?

No.






Quote:
It was pretty interesting.
Isn't it interesting though how all of these people of any age lacking impulse control- particularly of violent impulses are MALES?
Seriously- I find that aspect of it fascinating. Any theories?

No.




Quote:

And I'm not talking about conquering and testosterone and the conditioning that all males receive in most societies. I'm talking about how it always seems to get more twisted in males and very seldomly does (at least not to the same extent) in females.
What do you think that's about?

I 'm sorry that I don 't have an answer.





Quote:
It has been my direct observation
that kids packing heat
( be thay handguns or shoulder weapons )
are a lot more sedate
and self-possessed than kids whom I 've seen running around
( apparently unarmed )
in public places in NY, while acting foolishly.

Quote:
Have you seen many kids packing heat?
I mean currently- in today's world- in your everyday environs?

No.
The last kid I saw packing heat in school was ME,
when I brought an M-1 Carbine in to English class
for show n tell. I field stripped it, in front of the class n got a good grade.

Competitive gunnery teams were very common in schools.
After the First World War, the Director of Civilian Marksmanship
( created by Congress )
encouraged gunnery practice for proficiency,
and sold a lot of war surplus guns.

I bought a mint condition M 1 Carbine for $20
and a .45 caliber 1911 automatic pistol for $12.







Quote:
Think back to Churchill 's stirring speech
of English resistence to any Nazi invasion,
on the beaches, and in many other places.

Is it your opinion that if your 5th graders had been in a last ditch
defense of home n family ( as actually HAPPENED, in Germany )
that thay 'd have been so undisciplined and foolish as to point
their weapons at one another, instead of the Nazis,
because of their age ?? I do not believe that thay wud.

Quote:
No, but David, that's an entirely different psychological mindset.
When you are at war and fighting a common enemy- of course you are
focused on self-preservation and the defeat of that enemy.

But in the scenario you offer, with all children being armed in self-defense
against the off-chance that one of their friends or family members or
neighbors might run amuk and show up shooting,

That caution wud have served them well
at Columbine H.S. and at Virginia Tech; saved a lot of lives
who were all KILLED BY GUN CONTROL.






Quote:

in the meantime, while they're waiting for the chance to protect themselves,
it'd seem to me that there'd be much more of a chance for those guns
to be a distraction, an alleviation of boredom, with tragic accidental results.

There is no distraction,
in that u get used to it and forget about it pretty quick.
The academic subject matter and the teacher distract u from it.

Neither is there any " waiting "
any more than a homeowner who keeps a fire extinguisher
in his house is * WAITING * for smoke n flames to break out,
or a motorist with a spare tire in his trunk is * WAITING * to get a flat.






Quote:
When German children were conscripted by Hitler
into a last ditch defense of Berlin against the commies,
there is NO historical finding of chaotic activity on their part.
Thay acted like ordinary soldiers;
i.e., thay laid down, or braced,
aimed at the communists and shot them, as well as possible.
Hitler is on film giving them a lot of Iron Crosses.

Quote:
Do you think this enhanced their childhood experience- having killed someone- for whatever reason?

No; its more like swimming for shore,
when your boat has sunk; u do what u have to do,
in the circumstances.






Quote:

Do you think that after it was all over that these children were proud of themselves for having defended the cause that they did and that one of the most evil men of the twentieth century gave them a medal for their actions? Do you think they were even aware who or what they were supporting?

Yes; thay were defending themselves,
their homes n families from communist invaders.
Thay had pretty good ideas what the Russians wud do.







Quote:

How do you think they felt when they were old enough to understand and figure out who and what they had supported?

Well, thay seem rather matter-of-fact about it,
when thay discuss it during interviews on TV.





Quote:

Do you think they told themselves they were just following orders?

No; see above, about the invading communists.




Quote:

It'd be fascinating to know how those children felt and coped with what
had been thrust upon them as children- as they grew into adults.
Any knowledge of that David?

Yes; thay r not uncommon on TV,
rendering interviews on the Military Channel,
or the History Channel. Thay r just matter-fact-about it.





Quote:
There were 2 boys, 9 year old twins in Malaya ( I believe )
whose parents were killed by invading soldiers from Thailand,
during the 1990s; thay got some automatic rifles and formed a militia,
setting up successful ambushes againt the Thais ( Siamese ),
avenging the murders of their parents.
( Thay have my respect. )

Quote:
Yes-I have the sort of temperament that I can see myself doing something like this. I read about a mother who sat in court and saw her son's abuser acquitted on a technicality and she shot him dead right in the courtroom. I have to say, I didn't blame her, and I could see myself reacting to something like that as viscerally as she did.

I saw that on TV;
defendant had taunted her.






Quote:
Quote:
Quote:

what are they arming themselves against or in preparation for?

Against the potential of the predatory violence
of criminals or animals of which we read in the newspapers.
Maybe there is no crime in the Vatican,
but America had its Cho, and England had its Jack the Ripper.

Its better to have a gun and not need it
than to need a gun and not have it.
( Ask the students at Virginia Tech. )


Quote:
You know, with this last shooting, I discovered a real change
in my focus on the cause or the possible deterrents.
I think it's too simple and really disingenuous to continue blaming incidences like these on the easy availability of guns.

Might as well blame forks n spoons for obesity
and blame umbrellas for rainstorms.








Quote:

Just as it's too easy to blame the epidemic of drug use and self-medication on the easy availability of drugs.
Our society is creating these really sick and/or sad people who either need to take drugs to make it through the day- or express their hatred and anger through violence.
It's not about guns any more for me David, although I wish it was because that'd be something concrete to pin it on- and I could have some hope that one simple change might make a difference.
Sadly, I think the problem is much more nebulous and insidious and solving it will be much more involved than simply making weapons less easily available.

There is no such thing.
It did not work in the 1920s with alcohol,
nor does it work now with marijuana, nor heroin.
The Supreme Law of the Land is Supply and Demand.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 May, 2007 01:29 pm
Quote:
Will u define your term ?

You don't know what a crush is David? An infatuation, fancy, puppy love....get the picture?

Quote:
Reminiscent of my ex-girlfriend, Marilyn who used to scream
when her 4 year old daughter pulled her hair, or hit her.
That was child abuse.

Yeah, abuse by a child.

Quote:
It sounds like it means foot lover;
( like pedestrian ).

Laughing yes- especially when we Americans spell it (or you foneticists). It's somewhat clearer when the Brits reference it with the added a.

Quote:
I can remember my fifth grade teacher (he had quite a temper)
throwing a math book and chalk and an eraser at various kids in my fifth
grade class at various times to get them to be quiet.

Someone shud have sued him for assault n battery.[/QUOTE]
I don't think he ever really hit anyone with any of those things. It was just for the shock value and emphasis. Kind of like shooting a pistol into the air.
You're big on law suits, huh? Do lawyers ever feel that our society has become suit-happy- to it's detriment?

Quote:
But in the scenario you offer, with all children being armed in self-defense
against the off-chance that one of their friends or family members or
neighbors might run amuk and show up shooting,

That caution wud have served them well
at Columbine H.S. and at Virginia Tech; saved a lot of lives
who were all KILLED BY GUN CONTROL.
[/QUOTE]
Do you think that there were other factors at play that influenced whether or not a student would come to school with a defensive weapon apart from the gun laws. I know that no matter what the gun laws were, I wouldn't have thought to bring a gun to my school. I think it would have taken a specific and unique mindset (such as yours) to have come to school prepared in that way everyday.

Quote:
Its better to have a gun and not need it
than to need a gun and not have it.
( Ask the students at Virginia Tech. )
[/quote][/QUOTE]
I'm sad to say that I've felt that way several times in the past. Once when I was walking home from a friend's house early in the evening. She offered to drive me, but it had started snowing and I wanted to walk in the snow, and it was only a mile or two, so I started walking and almost immediately this guy in a car started tailing me and talking to me through the passenger window. He asked if I wanted a ride, I said no, and he drove away and then he circled the block and came up behind me again. I just kept walking, but he did this like two or three times. Finally I hid behind a car in a driveway until he had passed and I was so scared and crying and shaking I knocked on the door of the first house that had a light on in the window and asked the woman who answered it to drive me home. She did.
I was so angry that this person made it impossible for me to even take a peaceful walk in the snow. I did wish I'd had a gun. I'd have shot that guy's tires out, and if he got out of the car and threatened me, I'd have wanted to shoot him. The problem is that even if I had had a gun, I don't know that I'd have been able to do that. And then maybe he'd get the gun and I'd be the one who would have ended up dead.
But I remember, I was so angry...it just seemed like such an infringement of my rights and freedoms. Even writing this now, all these years later it makes me angry.
Why should I (and other women and children) have to live our lives in fear? But we shouldn't have to endanger our own life or any others by carrying and shooting guns either.

We should insist on changes that would make fear and protectiveness unneccessary.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 May, 2007 04:25 pm
aidan wrote:
Quote:
Will u define your term ?

Quote:
You don't know what a crush is David?
An infatuation, fancy, puppy love....get the picture?

Does that mean that U LIKE SOMEONE ?

I love puppies; is that puppy love ?





Quote:
I can remember my fifth grade teacher (he had quite a temper)
throwing a math book and chalk and an eraser at various kids in my fifth
grade class at various times to get them to be quiet.

Someone shud have sued him for assault n battery.

Quote:
I don't think he ever really hit anyone with any of those things.
It was just for the shock value and emphasis.

OK, then forget the cause of action for battery.
At common law * ASSAULT * is putting a man of average courage
into fear of an imminent battery. He was tortiously liable for that
by hurling the missle; sue the school, too,
in respondiat superior.







Quote:

You're big on law suits, huh?

Yeah.



Quote:
Do lawyers ever feel that our society has become suit-happy- to it's detriment ?

No.







Quote:
But in the scenario you offer, with all children being armed in self-defense
against the off-chance that one of their friends or family members or
neighbors might run amuk and show up shooting,

That caution wud have served them well
at Columbine H.S. and at Virginia Tech; saved a lot of lives
who were all KILLED BY GUN CONTROL.




Quote:
Do you think that there were other factors at play that influenced
whether or not a student would come to school with a defensive weapon apart from the gun laws.

Yes: the desire for self preservation






Quote:
I know that no matter what the gun laws were,
I wouldn't have thought to bring a gun to my school.

With the fullest degree of respect and affection:
that 's like declaring that no matter what
the automotive laws require, u 'd not have thought
to put a spare tire into your trunk.
Just take it on faith,
that u won 't get any flats.











Quote:
I think it would have taken a specific and unique mindset
(such as yours) to have come to school prepared in that way everyday.

Forgive my redundance, but it IS better to have a gun and not need it
than to need a gun and not have it.

A few years ago, I took a cruise on the Queen Elizabeth II.
The captain did not expect the ship to sink.
We did not have ruff weather,
but thay made us put on the life jackets that were kept in our staterooms,
and have a life boat drill anyway.
Its the same principle.


U don 't ask your ambulance driver to turn off the siren
and stop at your insurance broker 's office on the way to the hospital.
U buy your health insurance BEFORE u feel the chest pains,
and keep up the monthly premia, all the time, just in case.










Quote:
Its better to have a gun and not need it
than to need a gun and not have it.
( Ask the students at Virginia Tech. )


Quote:
I'm sad to say that I've felt that way several times in the past. Once when I was walking home from a friend's house early in the evening. She offered to drive me, but it had started snowing and I wanted to walk in the snow, and it was only a mile or two, so I started walking and almost immediately this guy in a car started tailing me and talking to me through the passenger window. He asked if I wanted a ride, I said no, and he drove away and then he circled the block and came up behind me again.
I just kept walking, but he did this like two or three times.


It almost reminds me a little bit of Kitty Genovese
.








Quote:

Finally I hid behind a car in a driveway until he had passed and I was so scared
and crying and shaking I knocked on the door of the first house that had
a light on in the window and asked the woman who answered it to drive me home. She did.

When I was alone in Arizona,
at age 8, I felt a little uneasy,
until I got my first gun.
( Tranquility = my first gun )




Quote:

I was so angry that this person made it impossible for me to even take a peaceful walk in the snow. I did wish I'd had a gun. I'd have shot that guy's tires out, and if he got out of the car and threatened me, I'd have wanted to shoot him. The problem is that even if I had had a gun, I don't know that I'd have been able to do that.

There is a respected statistician, Gary Glick,
who has found that in America annually
2, 500, 000 times felonious predatory violence is avoided
by the imminent victim merely DISPLAYING the presence
of defensive firepower, whereupon the predator turns and runs for his life;
( in contemplation whereof, the wise are counselled to purchase silver
colored, stainless steel mirror revolvers [ preferably in .44 special ],
as an in terrorem factor )







Quote:

And then maybe he'd get the gun

U can 't let that occur.
If it starts to happen, u need to put a round into his groin.
He probably won 't like that; it will alter his vector,
and slow him down.





Quote:
and I'd be the one who would have ended up dead.

Everyone ends up dead;
u just need to do the best u can before then.








Quote:

But I remember, I was so angry...it just seemed like such an infringement of my rights and freedoms.

That 's what defensive guns r FOR.







Quote:
Even writing this now, all these years later it makes me angry.
Why should I (and other women and children)
have to live our lives in fear?

During MY childhood,
I did not have live my life in fear,
except before I took defensive preparations.






Quote:

But we shouldn't have to endanger our own life
or any others by carrying and shooting guns either.

I have carried guns and shot them many times,
but never endangered my life; one does not require the other.





Quote:

We should insist on changes that would make fear and protectiveness unneccessary.

That is not part of this reality.

Since the beginning of life on this planet,
predatory circumstances have been extant.
That is nature; the only folks who r 100% safe r in the cemetary.


U might as well relax n enjoy it;
that 's what I 'm doing.
David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 May, 2007 09:00 pm
aidan wrote:



Quote:
Its better to have a gun and not need it
than to need a gun and not have it.
( Ask the students at Virginia Tech. )

Quote:
I'm sad to say that I've felt that way several times in the past.
Once when I was walking home from a friend's house early in the evening.
She offered to drive me, but it had started snowing and I wanted to walk
in the snow, and it was only a mile or two, so I started walking and
almost immediately this guy in a car started tailing me and talking to me
through the passenger window. He asked if I wanted a ride, I said no,
and he drove away and then he circled the block and came up behind me again.

I just kept walking, but he did this like two or three times.
Finally I hid behind a car in a driveway until he had passed and I was so
scared and crying and shaking I knocked on the door of the first house
that had a light on in the window and asked the woman who answered it
to drive me home. She did.

I was so angry that this person made it impossible for me to even take a
peaceful walk in the snow. I did wish I'd had a gun. I'd have shot that
guy's tires out, and if he got out of the car and threatened me, I'd have
wanted to shoot him. The problem is that even if I had had a gun, I don't
know that I'd have been able to do that. And then maybe he'd get the
gun and I'd be the one who would have ended up dead.
But I remember, I was so angry...it just seemed like such an
infringement of my rights and freedoms.
Even writing this now, all these years later it makes me angry.

Why should I (and other women and children) have to live our lives in fear?
But we shouldn't have to endanger our own life or any others by carrying and shooting guns either.





Women take up arms
Rising number of 'security moms' get serious about safety

Sarah Langbein | Sentinel Staff Writer
Posted May 6, 2007
APOPKA -- Monday is Ladies Night, and Lorrie McNally is a regular here. So is her 62-year-old mom.

The air is thick and smoky, and the place is packed. People are forced to
shout over the boom, boom, boom.

But these women aren't clutching cocktails -- they're gripping guns.
Ladies Night at the Shoot Straight gun range means women don't pay.

McNally trains her eyes on a neon-orange target nearly 20 feet away.
She pulls the trigger 17 times, pausing only momentarily between each shot,
eyeing the spot where the slug punctures the target.

"I wouldn't want her shooting at me," her boyfriend remarked about her accuracy.

That's the fear McNally hopes to instill. Ten years ago, the Eustis woman
found herself on the other end of a gun, when she was nearly abducted in
broad daylight from a mall parking lot. Her screams saved her then, but
she vowed that next time -- should there be one -- she would not rely on
her lungs to save her.
Next time, her attackers would be looking down the barrel of her gun.

McNally, 39, represents a growing number of women who have armed themselves for personal safety.

Here in Central Florida, shooting ranges are reporting a marked increase
in the number of women taking aim, signing up for concealed-weapons
courses and making purchases. On a recent Saturday, more than 200
women attended a six-hour introductory firearms workshop
-- an event
that keeps growing each year.

Nationwide, the National Rifle Association's "Women on Target" program
has grown from 500 participants in 2000 to 6,000 this year.

"Women are the largest-growing demographic in the gun industry,"
NRA spokeswoman Ashley Varner said.


McNally practices shooting each week. The 5-foot-6-inch, 129-pound
mortgage broker slams a magazine into her 9 mm semiautomatic and
pulls the slide back, creating a ch-ch sound. She takes aim at the target
and fires away, her bracelets jingling at each pull of the trigger.

"I keep it on me wherever I go," she said when finished.

The mother of an 18-year-old son, she keeps a Springfield semiautomatic
in her purse and a Beretta pistol at home or in her glove box.

"I think it's more important for women with small children to own a gun
because you can't run when you have children," she said.

Two years ago, one in 10 of Shoot Straight's students was a woman.
Now, ladies make up about 40 percent of its gun classes, said Larry Anderson,
manager of the Shoot Straight in Apopka.

At East Orange Shooting Sports in Winter Park, the number of female
customers is up almost 25 percent over last year, manager John Ritz said.

"The ladies seemed more keyed into personal safety," Ritz said of his clients.

But, he stressed, "Having a gun on the nightstand doesn't make you any
safer just by its presence. The customer has to be educated, has to be informed."

Anderson's and Ritz's jobs put them face to face with crime victims,
the people who have been robbed, beaten and raped.

They've also met their share of so-called soccer moms who no longer are
packing only lunches -- now they want to pack heat.

Known as security moms, these women, the NRA says, are arming
themselves with weapons in the belief that they are the first line of
defense against crime, especially since the Sept. 11 attacks sent a wave
of fear into American communities.

Gunshop owners say they see an increase in sales after events such as hurricanes,
a series of unsolved rapes or an overall spike in crime, as Orlando
experienced with a record-breaking number of slayings last year.

"More people out there aren't feeling safe," Anderson said.

Industry catering to women

McNally's mother, Carol, started shooting last year, mostly at the urging
of her daughter, who is quick to preach about personal safety.

"The bad guys are out there. They do a carjacking today, and they're out
on the streets tomorrow," Carol McNally said. "I doubt that I'd ever have
to use the gun, but if anyone threatened me, my family, my kids, my
grandson, I wouldn't hesitate. I have the confidence to carry it without
feeling intimidated by it."

The gun industry is doing its part to make ownership less threatening by
creating models better fitting for women -- smaller and more contoured
to their hands. And in doing so, gun manufacturers have clued into
something else -- that there's a market for stylish and more feminine
accessories and products.

Gun manufacturer Taurus, for instance, unveiled a pink-pearl handgun,
as well as a smaller-barreled gun, which can fit more easily in purses.
There's even a range of chic holster purses that are just as fashionable
as high-end handbags. What better way to appeal to women?
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 12:55 am
Quote:
Quote:
You don't know what a crush is David?
An infatuation, fancy, puppy love....get the picture?

Does that mean that U LIKE SOMEONE ?

David you crack me up (which means: you make me laugh)
It means you're attracted to what you know of someone - at least on the surface. It differs from usual "liking" because you can like someone without also having a "crush" on them. "Crush" implies that there is just a little extra spark- there's something about them that might inspire simple "like" to continue on into "attraction" and "love."

Quote:
I love puppies; is that puppy love ?[/b]

Sure.

Quote:
Quote:
I can remember my fifth grade teacher (he had quite a temper)
throwing a math book and chalk and an eraser at various kids in my fifth
grade class at various times to get them to be quiet.

Someone shud have sued him for assault n battery.
[/QUOTE]
I would never have done that- I had a wicked crush on him Laughing - bad temper and all.
Quote:
Quote:
I don't think he ever really hit anyone with any of those things.
It was just for the shock value and emphasis.

OK, then forget the cause of action for battery.
At common law * ASSAULT * is putting a man of average courage
into fear of an imminent battery. He was tortiously liable for that
by hurling the missle; sue the school, too,
in respondiat superior.

Again, I would never have done that. I loved and was loyal to my elementary school. I still go by and visit whenever I go home. Can you believe my sixth grade teacher still works there- in the same classroom- and he still has memories of my specific sixth grade class that we talk about.
In my sixth grade class, twin brothers got in a fight (Stephen and Jason S.) and one pushed the other into the blackboard and it shattered and fell in shards all around them. Did you know that could happen to a blackboard? Anyway, no one was hurt, thank goodness- or I'm sure the school would have been sued.
But that's why I'm saying my memories of the behavior of kids in grade school seem to be very, very different from yours.

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:

You're big on law suits, huh?

Yeah.

Quote:
Do lawyers ever feel that our society has become suit-happy- to it's detriment ?

No.

Okay.

Quote:
Quote:
Do you think that there were other factors at play that influenced
whether or not a student would come to school with a defensive weapon apart from the gun laws.

Yes: the desire for self preservation

I guess that's fair to say, especially these days.

Quote:
Quote:
I know that no matter what the gun laws were,
I wouldn't have thought to bring a gun to my school.

With the fullest degree of respect and affection:
that 's like declaring that no matter what
the automotive laws require, u 'd not have thought
to put a spare tire into your trunk.
Just take it on faith,
that u won 't get any flats.

I understand what you're saying.

Quote:
Quote:
I'm sad to say that I've felt that way several times in the past. Once when I was walking home from a friend's house early in the evening. She offered to drive me, but it had started snowing and I wanted to walk in the snow, and it was only a mile or two, so I started walking and almost immediately this guy in a car started tailing me and talking to me through the passenger window. He asked if I wanted a ride, I said no, and he drove away and then he circled the block and came up behind me again.
I just kept walking, but he did this like two or three times.


It almost reminds me a little bit of Kitty Genovese
.

Well yes, except that he never got out of the car and didn't physically try to assault me in any way. He was just intimidating and threatening and made it impossible for me to function as I wished.

Quote:
Quote:

Finally I hid behind a car in a driveway until he had passed and I was so scared
and crying and shaking I knocked on the door of the first house that had
a light on in the window and asked the woman who answered it to drive me home. She did.

When I was alone in Arizona,
at age 8, I felt a little uneasy,
until I got my first gun.
( Tranquility = my first gun )

But that's because you liked guns David. I don't want to carry a gun. It would make me feel that I had capitulated in some way and had ended up letting other people manipulate and coerce me into living in a way that I didn't want to.

Quote:
Quote:

And then maybe he'd get the gun

U can 't let that occur.
If it starts to happen, u need to put a round into his groin.
He probably won 't like that; it will alter his vector,
and slow him down.

Laughing Like I said before, you're the master of understatement.
But seriously, then I'd have to live with the fact that I'd killed or maimed someone for the rest of my life.
I just don't want to be put in that position.

Quote:
Quote:
and I'd be the one who would have ended up dead.

Everyone ends up dead;
u just need to do the best u can before then.

I'm trying.

Quote:
Quote:

But I remember, I was so angry...it just seemed like such an infringement of my rights and freedoms.

That 's what defensive guns r FOR.

What if carrying a gun makes you feel just as nervous or moreso than not? You're still giving up your right to peace of mind (in whichever way you achieve it).

Quote:
Quote:
Even writing this now, all these years later it makes me angry.
Why should I (and other women and children)
have to live our lives in fear?

During MY childhood,
I did not have live my life in fear,
except before I took defensive preparations.

But again, you enjoy guns David. I don't even particularly like to look at them.

Quote:
Quote:

But we shouldn't have to endanger our own life
or any others by carrying and shooting guns either.

I have carried guns and shot them many times,
but never endangered my life; one does not require the other.

I shouldn't have to live in a society where I have to be ready to kill or maim someone else, just to safely walk down the street. That's my bottom line.

Quote:
Quote:

We should insist on changes that would make fear and protectiveness unneccessary.

That is not part of this reality.

Exactly. Not in the United States. But there are other societies where lack of fear and confidence in one's general safety is much more of a reality. What do you think makes that difference? Why can't we try to replicate whatever it is in our own country?
Quote:

U might as well relax n enjoy it;
that 's what I 'm doing.
David[/b]
[/QUOTE]

Me too, when I'm able. This is where I went yesterday:

http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k46/aidan_010/reservoir.jpg

I've walked all along that ridge in the distance- in the woods, by myself, and have never had to give even a second's thought to my own protection (aside from having a cell phone with me in case I fall and sprain my ankle or something). There's nothing to arm myself in protection against. Do you see what I'm saying David? There are places you can live where defensiveness and protection are not the overriding concern (at least for women and children) as they are in the US.

I understand your point. And I think that you're right, because I have come to the conclusion that in the US, events have shown us that being in immediate possession of a gun can be as important to ones survival, or health and safety as the availability of medical coverage and insurance.

What I'm saying is that's not the way it should be- and that if you believe that that is just the way it is in the rest of the world- you're wrong.
(No offense- but you did tell me I could tell you that you were "rong"- remember.

Are you saying we should just give up on trying to make our own society safer by doing something as logical as trying to replicate what has already been found to be effective in other societies?

Don't you feel that in the long run, living with the predators/prey mentality and acting accordingly in reality severely limits our freedoms in so many ways?

PS-Thanks for the article, but again, though I know your heart is in the right place, I don't want to spend my FREE time shooting guns and thinking about protecting myself by being able to kill or maim someone else- and I shouldn't have to- unless I want to.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 02:36 am
I forgot one more thing, (sorry). This:

Quote:
The air is thick and smoky, and the place is packed. People are forced to
shout over the boom, boom, boom.

sounds like a nightmare to me. I would no more want to spend a minute of my free time in this environment than have my teeth pulled.
And it's an infringement on my freedoms and rights and pursuit of happiness that I have to feel that it might be in my best interest to do so.

Quote:

"I keep it on me wherever I go," she said when finished.

The mother of an 18-year-old son, she keeps a Springfield semiautomatic
in her purse and a Beretta pistol at home or in her glove box.

"I think it's more important for women with small children to own a gun
because you can't run when you have children," she said.

I would have no peace of mind if I had a gun in any proximity to my children. Because even if I trusted my own children- how would I know what any of their friends would do if they happened upon a gun in my home or in my car or bag? I wouldn't.
(And I've told you about the tragedy that happened in my extended family when a small child got his hands on a gun- and my uncle and aunt were responsible and loving parents).

Quote:
"I think it's more important for women with small children to own a gun
because you can't run when you have children," she said.

This is just sad. And you're telling me that those children have no fear instilled into them when their mothers are talking like this?

Quote:
"More people out there aren't feeling safe," Anderson said.

And we can think of no other changes that might need to be made?

Quote:
They've also met their share of so-called soccer moms who no longer are
packing only lunches -- now they want to pack heat.

If this wasn't so sad- it'd be funny.

Quote:
And in doing so, gun manufacturers have clued into
something else -- that there's a market for stylish and more feminine
accessories and products.

Gun manufacturer Taurus, for instance, unveiled a pink-pearl handgun,
as well as a smaller-barreled gun, which can fit more easily in purses.
There's even a range of chic holster purses that are just as fashionable
as high-end handbags. What better way to appeal to women?

This is funny. Let's just mask the real issue by dressing it up and making it look pretty for the girls. Laughing
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 May, 2007 11:53 am
aidan wrote:
I forgot one more thing, (sorry). This:

Quote:
The air is thick and smoky, and the place is packed.
People are forced to shout over the boom, boom, boom.

Quote:
sounds like a nightmare to me.
I would no more want to spend a minute of my free time
in this environment than have my teeth pulled.

I have NOT found the air to be thick nor smoky
in any gunnery range, be it indoor nor outdoor, that I have ever used.

However, I can c the benefits of using silencers.


I wud compare it to taking a class on how best to manage
your cholesterol, for long life, or a class in safe swimming.







Quote:

And it's an infringement on my freedoms and rights
and pursuit of happiness that I have to feel
that it might be in my best interest to do so.

Your emotions r your your own private choice.
No one is coercing u into a selection of any emotion.
In any case,
your selection of emotions, has no effect on the rights
of any of your fellow citizens.





Quote:

"I keep it on me wherever I go," she said when finished.

The mother of an 18-year-old son, she keeps a Springfield semiautomatic
in her purse and a Beretta pistol at home or in her glove box.

"I think it's more important for women with small children to own a gun
because you can't run when you have children," she said.

Quote:
I would have no peace of mind if I had a gun in any proximity to my children.

According to the National Safety Council,
many, many more people die from drowning annually
than from gunfire; the latter just gets a lot more ATTENTION in the press.
How do you feel about your children being around CARS ?
Many, many multiples of deaths result from automotive accidents
than from gunfire.
Do u tell them to stay away from cars ?

Medical malpractice ? The ratio of deaths from that
to gunfire is GIGANTIC.






Quote:

Because even if I trusted my own children-
how would I know what any of their friends would do if they happened
upon a gun in my home or in my car or bag? I wouldn't.

Hence the need for hands-on education
in safe and accurate firearms handling education early
in each child 's education, along with arithmetic, geografy n fonetic spelling.
( Do thay go thru your bags ? )






Quote:
(And I've told you about the tragedy that happened in my extended family when a small child got his hands on a gun- and my uncle and aunt were responsible and loving parents).

What was that again ?





Quote:
"I think it's more important for women with small children
to own a gun because you can't run when you have children," she said.

Quote:
This is just sad. And you're telling me that those children
have no fear instilled into them when their mothers are talking like this?

At the age of 8, my own fears were quieted and nullified
when I strapped on my first gun; I have felt tranquil ever since.

I take it that when u go to bed at nite,
u have no gun around to defend yourself, if the need arises ?
Even the QUEEN OF ENGLAND,
found herself in need of personal defense
in her bedroom only a few years ago.

Do u sleep in a better state of security than she does ?




Quote:
"More people out there aren't feeling safe," Anderson said.

Quote:
And we can think of no other changes that might need to be made?

Well, how do u feel about applying Julius Caesar 's way
of disarming criminals ?



Here r David 's proposals for reduction of crime:
1. Repeal all victim disarmament laws,
so that each citizen can and will attend to his own self defense, as he sees fit,
thus restoring the status quo ante as of the early 20th Century,
both in America and in England.

2. Repeal all laws controlling what people r prohibited
from voluntarily ingesting ( addictive drugs )
thus restoring the personal freedom of the early 20th Century.
Then folks can choose to buy whatever thay wish,
at little cost, from a drug store without violently preying upon
their fellow citizens to coerce them into financially supporting
their drug habits. Those drug prices have been artificially inflated
to the FINANCIAL GLORY of illegal drug dealers, ( by law )
at the expense of public safety.
Drug laws are deeply unAmerican.

3. BANISH feloniously violent criminal recidivists
from the North American Continent; ( rather than release them back into polite society ).
Maybe we can rent space in Botany Bay;
if not, we ll find somewhere else.
America owns islands in the Aleutian chain
that r closer to Japan, than to America.




Quote:
They've also met their share of so-called soccer moms who no longer are
packing only lunches -- now they want to pack heat.

Quote:
If this wasn't so sad- it'd be funny.

When I first began to pack heat,
I WAS HAPPY; I am still happy.
Sadness had no home in MY being when I made
my first 2 inch .38 revolver my companion.






Quote:
And in doing so, gun manufacturers have clued into
something else -- that there's a market for stylish and more feminine
accessories and products.

Gun manufacturer Taurus, for instance, unveiled a pink-pearl handgun,
as well as a smaller-barreled gun, which can fit more easily in purses.
There's even a range of chic holster purses that are just as fashionable
as high-end handbags. What better way to appeal to women?

Quote:
This is funny.
Let's just mask the real issue
by dressing it up and making it look pretty for the girls. Laughing

Define the " real issue " ?
David
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 May, 2007 02:30 pm
Hey David! How are you?

Quote:
Quote:
The air is thick and smoky, and the place is packed.
People are forced to shout over the boom, boom, boom.

Quote:
sounds like a nightmare to me.
I would no more want to spend a minute of my free time
in this environment than have my teeth pulled.

I have NOT found the air to be thick nor smoky
in any gunnery range, be it indoor nor outdoor, that I have ever used.

So do you think that was just artistic license in that the author was trying to make his piece more atmospheric and so maybe he exaggerated?

Quote:
I wud compare it to taking a class on how best to manage
your cholesterol, for long life, or a class in safe swimming.

Would you really take a class in how to manage your cholesterol? I'd have to pass on that one I think. That's one instance in which I'd use Coberst's model of self-teaching/learning.

Do you think you really need a class in terms of handling firearms? If you have pretty good natural aim, don't you think you could just read the manual about the safety features and take it out into the woods and practice shooting targets? I know that's what I'd be tempted to do, so I suspect a lot of other people do that. Is a safety course mandatory when you buy a fire-arm?

Quote:
Quote:

And it's an infringement on my freedoms and rights
and pursuit of happiness that I have to feel
that it might be in my best interest to do so.

Your emotions r your your own private choice.
No one is coercing u into a selection of any emotion.
In any case,
your selection of emotions, has no effect on the rights
of any of your fellow citizens.

Of course not- unless they are the ones who are inflicting their messed up emotions on me through dangerous or deadly use of firearms.

Quote:

"I keep it on me wherever I go," she said when finished.

The mother of an 18-year-old son, she keeps a Springfield semiautomatic
in her purse and a Beretta pistol at home or in her glove box.

Quote:
"I think it's more important for women with small children to own a gun
because you can't run when you have children," she said.

Quote:
I would have no peace of mind if I had a gun in any proximity to my children.

According to the National Safety Council,
many, many more people die from drowning annually
than from gunfire; the latter just gets a lot more ATTENTION in the press.
How do you feel about your children being around CARS ?
Many, many multiples of deaths result from automotive accidents
than from gunfire.
Do u tell them to stay away from cars ?

DAVID Cars and automobiles used for daily transport are a fact of life. What I'm saying is that violence and self-protection from random acts of violence should not be. Unfortunately they are in the US- but they are NOT in other countries.

I would love you to address why you do not see it as important or even logical for us to examine what we could do in our own country to make it safer for its citizens- ASIDE and APART from arming ourselves.


Quote:
Medical malpractice ? The ratio of deaths from that
to gunfire is GIGANTIC.

Yes, and if there are all of these perils already built into our lifestyle in our country- why don't we remove those that we can?

Dysentery and malaria and starvation and AIDS are perils that run rampant in certain undeveloped or developing third world countries. But I never hear people saying- "More people die of malaria- so that means we shouldn't attempt to limit the negative impact of dysentary."

Quote:
Quote:

Because even if I trusted my own children-
how would I know what any of their friends would do if they happened
upon a gun in my home or in my car or bag? I wouldn't.

Hence the need for hands-on education
in safe and accurate firearms handling education early
in each child 's education, along with arithmetic, geografy n fonetic spelling.
( Do thay go thru your bags ? )


Listen- I've learned that even if I tell kids (in general) not to do something- I shouldn't be surprised when I've found out they've done it anyway. I'm forever saying things to my kids like, "Can you get my wallet out of my bag for me?" "Will you please go out to the car and bring me that map out of the glove compartment?"
(Just as an aside, my kids even know my password to my e-mail- I had to laugh the other day when I was reading a thread and people who are in a family together don't want each other to know what's on their e-mail. I don't have any secrets from my children- they know exactly who I am and I want them to feel comfortable that they do. How else will they be able to trust in me)?

But what that means to me as a mother- is that I have to make sure my environment is safe for my kids- in every way, but especially physically -because if a child has any level of intelligence at all- they will be curious and explore- even when they're told not to. I know this- because it's what I was constantly doing as a child.

Quote:
Quote:
(And I've told you about the tragedy that happened in my extended family when a small child got his hands on a gun- and my uncle and aunt were responsible and loving parents).

What was that again ?

My five year old cousin found his father's gun and fatally shot his two year old sister. He never got over that- he died before he was 45 years old of alcolhol fed depression.


Quote:
At the age of 8, my own fears were quieted and nullified
when I strapped on my first gun; I have felt tranquil ever since.

I'm glad it's worked so well for you- truly- I only wish everyone could find tranquility and happiness so easily.

Quote:
I take it that when u go to bed at nite,
u have no gun around to defend yourself, if the need arises ?

No gun, but the house I'm living in has a panic button which connects right to the police station. I actually pushed it a couple of months after I first moved in (I thought it was the thermostat) and a couple of bobbies were at my door in less than two or three minutes. So I'm all set.
Quote:
Even the QUEEN OF ENGLAND,
found herself in need of personal defense
in her bedroom only a few years ago.

Do u sleep in a better state of security than she does ?[/b]

I think I probably live in a safer and less crime ridden part of England than she does. Laughing

Quote:
"More people out there aren't feeling safe," Anderson said.

Quote:
And we can think of no other changes that might need to be made?

Well, how do u feel about applying Julius Caesar 's way
of disarming criminals ?

Laughing Take a guess (about how I feel about applying Julius Ceasar's way of disarming criminals)? You know what I meant. You just know it's a good question to which you don't have any answers except that it would take too much effort and change in peoples' attitudes. But I'm willing to bet, you wish it could be different too.

Quote:
Here r David 's proposals for reduction of crime:
1. Repeal all victim disarmament laws,
so that each citizen can and will attend to his own self defense, as he sees fit,
thus restoring the status quo ante as of the early 20th Century,
both in America and in England.

What about people who can't afford firearms or training? Would they still be expected to attend to their own self-defense?

Quote:
2. Repeal all laws controlling what people r prohibited
from voluntarily ingesting ( addictive drugs )
thus restoring the personal freedom of the early 20th Century.
Then folks can choose to buy whatever thay wish,
at little cost, from a drug store without violently preying upon
their fellow citizens to coerce them into financially supporting
their drug habits. Those drug prices have been artificially inflated
to the FINANCIAL GLORY of illegal drug dealers, ( by law )
at the expense of public safety.
Drug laws are deeply unAmerican.

This is a whole different issue. I'm with you to an extent, but then I see someone I really like just wasted out of their heads on one drug or another (at work) and it just strikes me of what a huge waste of human potential drug use is.
I don't want to send the message to our children that it's fine to do by making it legal and available. I'd honestly rather live with the crime.

Quote:
3. BANISH feloniously violent criminal recidivists
from the North American Continent; ( rather than release them back into polite society ).
Maybe we can rent space in Botany Bay;
if not, we ll find somewhere else.
America owns islands in the Aleutian chain
that r closer to Japan, than to America. [/b][/color]

I think this is a great idea. I'd like to go too though....maybe I could work there.


Quote:
I WAS HAPPY; I am still happy.

I can tell.
Quote:
Sadness had no home in MY being

This is a beautiful statement- I really like the way you put this. Do you write poetry David? I'd not be surprised at all...
I think this would be a beautiful first line for a poem:
SADNESS HAS NO HOME IN MY BEING....

But I'd omit this..
Quote:
Quote:
when I made
my first 2 inch .38 revolver my companion.[/b]




Quote:
Define the " real issue " ?

That we cannot be safe and truly free in our homes and in our streets.

I was reading some interesting quotes about America (as a concept). I wondered what you might think of them.

1. This nation is founded on blood like a city on swamps,
yet its dream has been beautiful and sometimes just-
that now grows brutal and heavy as a burned-out star.
(Marge Piercy)

2. O, let America be America again. The land that never has been yet-
And yet must be. (Langston Hughes)

3. America is like an unfaithful lover who promised us more than we got.
(Charlotte Bunch)

Have a nice night. Talk to you later- Rebecca
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 May, 2007 07:08 pm
Aidan wrote:
Quote:
Hey David! How are you?

Fine, thank u.
How r u ?



Quote:
Quote:
The air is thick and smoky, and the place is packed.
People are forced to shout over the boom, boom, boom.

Quote:
sounds like a nightmare to me.
I would no more want to spend a minute of my free time
in this environment than have my teeth pulled.

I have NOT found the air to be thick nor smoky
in any gunnery range, be it indoor nor outdoor, that I have ever used.

Quote:
So do you think that was just artistic license
in that the author was trying to make his piece more atmospheric
and so maybe he exaggerated?

Just a shot in the dark here,
but that 's my best guess.








Quote:
I wud compare it to taking a class on how best to manage
your cholesterol, for long life, or a class in safe swimming.

Quote:
Would you really take a class in how to manage your cholesterol?

No.
I am not sufficiently concerned about the subject matter
to do so; I 'll leave it to those who r.





Quote:

I'd have to pass on that one I think.
That's one instance in which I'd use Coberst's model of self-teaching/learning.

I don 't know Coberst, nor his model.
but I 'll defer to your judgment in this matter.







Quote:

Do you think you really need a class in terms of handling firearms?

No; I 've already had them.
Sometimes thay r enjoyable,
including hands-on training, qua defensive strategy.

Give it a shot.







Quote:

If you have pretty good natural aim,
don't you think you could just read the manual
about the safety features and take it out into the woods
and practice shooting targets?

U shud not assume
that no one with more experience
can give u some good tips.
Its not all intuitive.

Do u know where to aim ?
How to deal with recoil in your piece of choice ? ( e.g., my .44 special ? )

how fastest to re-load ?
Its important to be very familiar with your piece.

Shud u wait until u smell smoke
b4 u read the box on how to operate your fire extinguisher ?






Quote:

I know that's what I'd be tempted to do,

Shud your wisdom guide your temptations ?








Quote:

so I suspect a lot of other people do that.
Is a safety course mandatory when you buy a fire-arm?

Not in NY.
It is in some jurisdictions.





Quote:
Quote:

And it's an infringement on my freedoms and rights
and pursuit of happiness that I have to feel
that it might be in my best interest to do so.

Your emotions r your your own private choice.
No one is coercing u into a selection of any emotion.
In any case,
your selection of emotions, has no effect on the rights
of any of your fellow citizens.

Quote:
Of course not- unless they are the ones who are inflicting their messed up emotions on me
through dangerous or deadly use of firearms.

U refer to criminal depredation ?









Quote:

"I keep it on me wherever I go," she said when finished.

The mother of an 18-year-old son, she keeps a Springfield semiautomatic
in her purse and a Beretta pistol at home or in her glove box.

Quote:
"I think it's more important for women with small children to own a gun
because you can't run when you have children," she said.

Quote:
I would have no peace of mind if I had a gun in any proximity to my children.

According to the National Safety Council,
many, many more people die from drowning annually
than from gunfire; the latter just gets a lot more ATTENTION in the press.
How do you feel about your children being around CARS ?
Many, many multiples of deaths result from automotive accidents
than from gunfire.
Do u tell them to stay away from cars ?


Quote:

DAVID Cars and automobiles
used for daily transport are a fact of life. What I'm saying is that violence
and self-protection from random acts of violence should not be.
Unfortunately they are in the US- but they are NOT
in other countries.

I would love you to address why you do not see it as important or even
logical for us to examine what we could do in our own country to make it
safer for its citizens- ASIDE and APART from arming ourselves.

See below, qua repeal of unAmerican government control
of human ingestion of drugs, and BANISHMENT of violent recidivists.





Quote:
Medical malpractice ? The ratio of deaths from that
to gunfire is GIGANTIC.

Quote:
Yes, and if there are all of these perils already built into our lifestyle in our country- why don't we remove those that we can?

1. Gun control causes MORE violent crime
by making violent crime SAFER for the criminal predator
( applying O.S.H.A. to criminals ).

2. NO ONE, including NO government has any right,
nor any authority to relinquish anyone else 's right to self defense;
that is an INALIENABLE RIGHT, as Jefferson put it.







Quote:

Dysentery and malaria and starvation and AIDS are perils that run
rampant in certain undeveloped or developing third world countries. But
I never hear people saying- "More people die of malaria- so that means
we shouldn't attempt to limit the negative impact of dysentary."

Correct me if I 'm rong,
but I doubt that dysentery or malaria
involve anyone 's rights.

Self defense is an ABSOLUTE, INALIENABLE RIGHT.
That includes the right of immediate access
to emergency equipment to support that right.






Quote:
Quote:

Because even if I trusted my own children-
how would I know what any of their friends would do if they happened
upon a gun in my home or in my car or bag? I wouldn't.

Hence the need for hands-on education
in safe and accurate firearms handling education early
in each child 's education, along with arithmetic, geografy n fonetic spelling.
( Do thay go thru your bags ? )


Quote:
Listen- I've learned that even if I tell kids (in general) not to do something-
I shouldn't be surprised when I've found out they've done it anyway.
I'm forever saying things to my kids like,
"Can you get my wallet out of my bag for me?"
"Will you please go out to the car and bring me that map out of the glove compartment?"
(Just as an aside, my kids even know my password to my e-mail- I had to laugh
the other day when I was reading a thread and people who are in a
family together don't want each other to know what's on their e-mail.
I don't have any secrets from my children- they know exactly who I am
and I want them to feel comfortable that they do.
How else will they be able to trust in me)?

My answer:
If I were a father ( assuming that my child were not mentally defective )
I 'd invite my child,
very early in his or her childhood,
to learn safe n accurate gun handling practices,
INCLUDING
plenty of hands-on experience in a safe gunnery range.

When he comes upon one of my guns, or his, during the course of the day,
he 'll be very familiar with it and leave it alone,
the same as he might see his hammer and phillips screwdriver
during the day, but he leaves them alone
until its time for carpentry; he 'd have
no sick curiousity of the FORBIDDEN fruit,
because it is NOT forbidden
.
This was the extant American philosophy until around
the mid-20th Century.



Quote:

But what that means to me as a mother-
is that I have to make sure my environment is safe for my kids-
in every way, but especially physically -because if a child has any level
of intelligence at all- they will be curious and explore- even when they're
told not to. I know this- because it's what I was constantly doing as a child.

The environment wud be safe
because of the mental adjustments of your children;
the same as it was for me, in my childhood.

When your child sees his hammer in his environment,
he does NOT use it to smack anyone; he leaves it alone
unless he needs it.



Quote:
Quote:
(And I've told you about the tragedy that happened
in my extended family when a small child got his hands on a gun- and my
uncle and aunt were responsible and loving parents).

What was that again ?

Quote:
My five year old cousin found his father's gun and fatally shot his two
year old sister. He never got over that- he died before he was 45 years
old of alcolhol fed depression.

There was a NYC police officer who defended himself
from the violence of a lunatic who used something
( a garden tool ? ) as a weapon.
He shot and killed the lunatic.
He thereafter fell into great anguish resulting in his own suicide.
That 's life on this planet.







Quote:
At the age of 8, my own fears were quieted and nullified
when I strapped on my first gun; I have felt tranquil ever since.

Quote:
I'm glad it's worked so well for you- truly-
I only wish everyone could find tranquility and happiness so easily.

Thank u







Quote:
I take it that when u go to bed at nite,
u have no gun around to defend yourself, if the need arises ?

Quote:
No gun, but the house I'm living in has a panic button which connects right to the police station. I actually pushed it a couple of months after I first moved in (I thought it was the thermostat) and a couple of bobbies were at my door in less than two or three minutes. So I'm all set.

Reminds me of Nicole Simpson on that 911 tape
when O. J. was breaking down the door.







Quote:
Even the QUEEN OF ENGLAND,
found herself in need of personal defense
in her bedroom only a few years ago.

Do u sleep in a better state of security than she does ?[/b]

Quote:
I think I probably live in a safer and less crime ridden part of England than she does. Laughing

I admire your choice of residential real estate.
I might have thought that the Royal Palace wud be in a decent part of town.










Quote:
"More people out there aren't feeling safe," Anderson said.

Quote:
And we can think of no other changes that might need to be made?

Well, how do u feel about applying Julius Caesar 's way
of disarming criminals ?

Quote:
Laughing Take a guess (about how I feel about applying Julius Ceasar's way of disarming criminals)?
You know what I meant.
You just know it's a good question to which you don't have any answers
except that it would take too much effort and change in peoples' attitudes.

Brainwashing ?
Tranquilizers in the water ?






Quote:

But I'm willing to bet, you wish it could be different too.


Quote:
Here r David 's proposals for reduction of crime:
1. Repeal all victim disarmament laws,
so that each citizen can and will attend to his own self defense, as he sees fit,
thus restoring the status quo ante as of the early 20th Century,
both in America and in England.

Quote:
What about people who can't afford firearms or training?

U mean like poor people who can 't afford televisions ?
Where there is a will,
there is a way.

In the town of Kennisaw, Georgia,
any household that cannot afford a gun
is required by law
to stop by the police station and one is provided for him.
That town has a very low rate of crime.



Quote:
Would they still be expected to attend to their own self-defense?

Yes.
That was the law, in Colonial times.
It was against the law to go to work or go to church in an unarmed condition.
Apparently, thay were losing too many Christians on the way to church.











Quote:
2. Repeal all laws controlling what people r prohibited
from voluntarily ingesting ( addictive drugs )
thus restoring the personal freedom of the early 20th Century.
Then folks can choose to buy whatever thay wish,
at little cost, from a drug store without violently preying upon
their fellow citizens to coerce them into financially supporting
their drug habits. Those drug prices have been artificially inflated
to the FINANCIAL GLORY of illegal drug dealers, ( by law )
at the expense of public safety.
Drug laws are deeply unAmerican.

Quote:
This is a whole different issue.

Almost all violent crime results from addictive drugs
being overpriced because of their prohibition,
such that desperate addicts resort to crime
to coerce their to grant financial support for their habits.

In other words, GOVERNMENT ( by its anti-drug laws )
IS A CRIME FACTORY.











Quote:
I'm with you to an extent, but then I see someone I really like
just wasted out of their heads on one drug or another (at work) and it
just strikes me of what a huge waste of human potential drug use is.

I don't want to send the message to our children that it's fine to do by making it legal and available.
I'd honestly rather live with the crime.

That 's fine for YOU,
as long as someone ELSE is the crime victim,
but from the victim 's perspective
he might well honestly rather live with
the addicts paying low prices and dying young,
while the victim lives out his life unoffended, in peace n security.


It is perversely ironic
that after government CREATES the violent crime by prohibiting drugs
( thus artificially driving up blackmarket prices over 1000% ),
then it prohibits the crime victims thereof from defending themselves
from the practitioners of that crime, by trying to stop them from arming themselves in self defense,
and then it TAXES the victims to support the enforcement
of the prohibition against their self defense from the crime that it engendered.

To its CREDIT, the government of England
does not join in the infliction of this evil cycle upon the populace.
On the other hand, America DOES.
I still remember President Nixon 's
" we will not have a generation of slaves " speech in support of prohibition.
He was not a real conservative; he was a fony;
( but his opponents were worse ).





Quote:
3. BANISH feloniously violent criminal recidivists
from the North American Continent; ( rather than release them back into polite society ).
Maybe we can rent space in Botany Bay;
if not, we ll find somewhere else.
America owns islands in the Aleutian chain
that r closer to Japan, than to America. [/b][/color]

Quote:
I think this is a great idea.
I'd like to go too though....maybe I could work there.

During WWII,
the Aleutian Islands did not have a good reputation
for weather, among our troops.

U might wish to reconsider.




Quote:
I WAS HAPPY; I am still happy.

I can tell.
Quote:
Sadness had no home in MY being

Quote:
This is a beautiful statement- I really like the way you put this.

Thank u






Quote:

Do you write poetry David? I'd not be surprised at all...

No, but once in a while,
I get smacked in the head with an idea.





Quote:
I think this would be a beautiful first line for a poem:
SADNESS HAS NO HOME IN MY BEING....


But I'd omit this..
Quote:
when I made
my first 2 inch .38 revolver my companion.[/b]

That 's the FUNNEST part.


Quote:
Define the " real issue " ?

Quote:
That we cannot be safe and truly free in our homes and in our streets.


Quote:
I was reading some interesting quotes about America (as a concept).
I wondered what you might think of them.

1. This nation is founded on blood like a city on swamps,

This is true.
The red in the American Flag
represents the blood that was shed in
the preservation of our freedom.





Quote:
yet its dream has been beautiful and sometimes just-
that now grows brutal and heavy as a burned-out star.
(Marge Piercy)

Also true, with the advent of liberalism and political correctness.





Quote:

2. O, let America be America again. The land that never has been yet-
And yet must be. (Langston Hughes)

So stipulated:
let America return to the freedom and simplicity of the 1800s.






Quote:

3. America is like an unfaithful lover who promised us more than we got.
(Charlotte Bunch)

Yes; the betrayal of liberalism.

Have a nice night. Talk to you later- Rebecca
U too.
David
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2007 11:51 am
Jesus wept.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2007 03:01 pm
Then he said unto them:
" But now, he that hath a purse,
let him take it, and likewise his scrip:
and HE THAT HATH NO SWORD,
let him sell his garment AND BUY ONE. "
[emphasis added]
Luke 22:36


That principle shud be extrapolated to more modern,
less bulky, personal defensive weapons
like .44 caliber revolvers loaded with hollowpointed slugs.
David
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2007 03:07 pm
he that taketh a sword and beat into a .357 magnum shall inherit the earth (so sayeth the lord on high) I shot the sheriff but i did not shoot the deputy down)
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2007 03:12 pm
In my opinion,
a .44 special trumps a .357 magnum for getting the job done
David
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 11:28 am
Quote:
="OmSigDAVID"]Aidan wrote:
Hey David! How are you?
Fine, thank u.
How r u

Very well, thank you.

Quote:
Do u know where to aim ?
How to deal with recoil in your piece of choice ? ( e.g., my .44 special ? )

Why do you assume your .44 special would be my "piece of choice"? The only gun I've ever shot was a rifle (don't ask me what kind). I was at my Aunt Alice's farm in west Texas and we were shooting bottles. I was a pretty good aim- and I was only eleven or twelve years old and even somewhat small for a girl of that age.
I also excelled at archery, and I'm good at darts. I think I just have naturally good aim.

Quote:
Shud u wait until u smell smoke
b4 u read the box on how to operate your fire extinguisher ?
[/b]

Probably not, but that'd be pretty typical of me.
I've had fire extinguishers in every house I've ever lived in, but I've yet to read even one set of instructions.


Quote:
Shud your wisdom guide your temptations ?

Now this is a good topic for a thread. If I start a thread with this topic, will you participate, and promise not to talk about guns?


Quote:
And it's an infringement on my freedoms and rights
and pursuit of happiness that I have to feel
that it might be in my best interest to do so.

Your emotions r your your own private choice.
No one is coercing u into a selection of any emotion.
In any case,
your selection of emotions, has no effect on the rights
of any of your fellow citizens.

Quote:
Of course not- unless they are the ones who are inflicting their messed up emotions on me
through dangerous or deadly use of firearms.

U refer to criminal depredation ?[/QUOTE]
Yes.

Quote:
Self defense is an ABSOLUTE, INALIENABLE RIGHT.
That includes the right of immediate access
to emergency equipment to support that right.

You know, it's on this one point that I AGREE
with you. If no one is going to do anything to attempt to make our communities safer for citizens, I do believe they should have the right to protect themselves in whatever manner they see fit.

It's not how I believe it should be, and I wish that it was different, but I don't see anyone making any suggestions or positive actions in that direction- so I guess the only thing left to do is make sure you can save your own life when confronted by violence.

Quote:
I admire your choice of residential real estate.
I might have thought that the Royal Palace wud be in a decent part of town.

She's in London though (when she's at Buckingham Palace). I'm out in the sticks.


Quote:

Well, how do u feel about applying Julius Caesar 's way
of disarming criminals ?

Quote:
Laughing Take a guess (about how I feel about applying Julius Ceasar's way of disarming criminals)?
[/QUOTE]
By the way, that little laugher meant that I got your joke/play on words.
Quote:
You know what I meant.
You just know it's a good question to which you don't have any answers
except that it would take too much effort and change in peoples' attitudes.

Brainwashing ?
Tranquilizers in the water ?
[/quote]
See, you don't have any. I don't have any either though...


Quote:
In the town of Kennisaw, Georgia,
any household that cannot afford a gun
is required by law
to stop by the police station and one is provided for him.
That town has a very low rate of crime.[/b]

Really?


Quote:
In other words, GOVERNMENT ( by its anti-drug laws )
IS A CRIME FACTORY.[/b]

Do you think that's intentional? I'm right on the line at having become cynical enough to believe it could be.

Quote:
I'm with you to an extent, but then I see someone I really like
just wasted out of their heads on one drug or another (at work) and it
just strikes me of what a huge waste of human potential drug use is.

I don't want to send the message to our children that it's fine to do by making it legal and available.
I'd honestly rather live with the crime.

That 's fine for YOU,
as long as someone ELSE is the crime victim,
but from the victim 's perspective
he might well honestly rather live with
the addicts paying low prices and dying young,
while the victim lives out his life unoffended, in peace n security.
[/quote]
I see what you mean. Again, if we're not going to do anything to change our society in any meaningful way- that might be the only solution.
But what a bunch of quitters and settlers (as in, "settling for less"- not settlers as people who settle a country) we are if that's what we choose to do.
Have you given up on mankind, David?
Quote:

Quote:
3. BANISH feloniously violent criminal recidivists
from the North American Continent; ( rather than release them back into polite society ).
Maybe we can rent space in Botany Bay;
if not, we ll find somewhere else.
America owns islands in the Aleutian chain
that r closer to Japan, than to America. [/b][/color]

Quote:
I think this is a great idea.
I'd like to go too though....maybe I could work there.

During WWII,
the Aleutian Islands did not have a good reputation
for weather, among our troops.

U might wish to reconsider.

Thanks for the heads up Laughing .

Quote:
I think this would be a beautiful first line for a poem:
SADNESS HAS NO HOME IN MY BEING....


But I'd omit this..
Quote:
when I made
my first 2 inch .38 revolver my companion.[/b]

That 's the FUNNEST part.
[/quote]
But it'd be a serious poem. You could save the funny part for a limerick -like this or something.:
When I was a boy of just eight
I learned what it was to feel great
My piece in my holster
Tranquility bolstered
Companionship times .38


Quote:
Quote:
Define the " real issue " ?
Quote:
That we cannot be safe and truly free in our homes and in our streets.


Quote:
I was reading some interesting quotes about America (as a concept).
I wondered what you might think of them.

Quote:
Quote:

2. O, let America be America again. The land that never has been yet-
And yet must be. (Langston Hughes)

So stipulated:
let America return to the freedom and simplicity of the 1800s.

I really hate when you selectively forget how less than free America was for many of its citizens in the l800's. That's beneath you David- I believe you're more inclusively caring than that- no matter how you'd like to make yourself appear.


Later- Rebecca
PS- sorry for all the messed up quotes. I hope you could figure out who said what when, etc.
0 Replies
 
akaMechsmith
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 09:08 pm
Guns
People here have mentioned that that fifth or seventh graders are not mature enough to have control of weapons.

In the United states and most of the westernized world society has been purposely, if unintentionally "dumbing down" our children.

This is because of the requirements of our technological society. We cannot educate our children sufficiently for them to make a living during their prepubescent years. Therefore we require them to remain children till long after puberty. Children are dependent, misbehave, are irresponsible and in general require supervision until such time that society, not mother nature, requires them to "act their age".

When I was on the John F. Kennedy-Lyndon B. Johnson sponsored tour of Southeast Asia I saw many instances of children that were making adult decisions for themselves. Perhaps they were not decisions that we all could all agree with but the decisions were at least as good as some persons here would make. I don't think JFK's and LBJ's decisions were so hot either Exclamation

I also would not want to be in a U.S. fifth grade classroom today with the kids potentially armed. But when I was in the fifth grade (55 years ago) we all had knives and occasionally a kid would bring a pistol or a rifle for one reason or another.
Most of my parents generation carried rifles to school during hunting season. (rural NY State) Now our kids are too irresponsible to be entrusted that far with them.

I aver that the kids have not changed that much in a hundred years. Farmermans studies of chromosonal change can vouch for that. What has changed is our society. That has changed considerably and one consequence of our prolonging the infantile and adolescent phase of human development is that children are REQUIRED to be much less responsible than they used to be at equivalent ages.

It seems funny Crying or Very sad That in order to insure that your child gets into a good school, acts responsibly towards society, and perhaps gets a masters or a Phd you have to retard his physical and social developement considerably. Sometimes the conflict between natural requirements and societal requirements hurts.

IMO natch; This is just another instance of "Unintended Consequences".

We should be aware of it, and deal with it accordingly! Whatever that is!

David, We can't turn back the clock, Aidan, and Rebecca, governments cannot be trusted; they are run by the very type of people who have had their natures most altered and consequently have the most unresolved conflicts within themselves. This does not make for good decision making Confused
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/01/2024 at 04:00:05