Is 'liking children' wrong, if you don't harm kids?

snood wrote:

I think O'Bill is in the classic situation of taking an untenable position then clinging to it out of pride, and I think Neo's comment highlights that perfectly... When it's good ole Uncle Charlie who gets caught playing touchy-feely, all that bluster about "just go kill yourself" won't be bellowed about.

Hardly. You should know me well enough by now that 'out of pride'; I would retract my statements if I thought it appropriate. The only difference family would make; is I might do the killing myself.

Really;

What if your brother came to you and said he was having sexual feelings toward his (or better, YOUR) daughter? Would you kill him for that?

What if he touched her on the behind while she was clothed?

What if he admitted he peeked at her while she was taking a bath?

Kill him for that?

I think you are full of bluster, buster.

OCCOM BILL wrote:

If you know you are the deviant monster; do us all a favor and take one for the team… do it RIGHT NOW!

I'm about to leave the house on a nice 2 week vacation, and thought I'd just jump on here to see if anything interesting was happening, while Mr. Tea makes a security check.

I listened dlowan, but I was already on that side of the fence. Good story though. I wonder if Bill thinks 18 year olds are "hot"...unless they are in a part of the world where that would make him a paedophile?

So if you are on holiday in Madagascar, and you see a girl of 16 (5 years under the age of consent), and you think she's hot...you don't think the locals have a right to call you a paedophile?

Did you listen to the interview, Bill? The guy didn't just wake up one morning lusting after 10 year olds. But you don't need to worry about grey areas, you've got all the answers already.

(I have no need to lash out at you, it isn't in any way personal. It's just your opinion I find disgusting.)

YES! I am 100% (would be a trillion % were it possible) in favor of every c**... who would molest children, given a chance, put a bullet in his own dome instead. 100%, let there be no doubt... be a hero.... Do it. Do it now...

Laws and morality both require recognition. It matters little if I thought a 16 year old girl was hot, as I wouldn't be touching her regardless of the legality.

OCCOM BILL wrote:

YES! I am 100% (would be a trillion % were it possible) in favor of every c**... who would molest children, given a chance, put a bullet in his own dome instead. 100%, let there be no doubt... be a hero.... Do it. Do it now...

I'd leave Madagascar off my holiday list if I were you, Bill, just in case. You haven't left yourself much wiggle room there.

what about my post above yours?

that's totally IN context.

it matters little if you think an underage girl is hot, since you won't be touching her.

but from what you said previously, it matters a LOT when someone thinks an underage girl is hot.

make up your mind.

. . . Quote from Chai acknowledged. . ..20 pages of this sustained idiocy. Someone who thinks about children IS NOT the same as someone WHO THINKS HE WILL HARM THEM. Get that through your thick skull arleady.

Your reasoning is crystal clear to exactly one person, evidently - that'd be you.

So, you're saying you give a pass to those who find minors sexy, but not to those who would think of molesting them?

I've seen 16 year olds that look like adults and I've seen 16 year olds that look like kids. Those who find the latter attractive are the target of my disdain. This should be beyond obvious to anyone who isn't trying to insult me as a punitive response to my visceral disgust with those who are heinously, dangerously, abnormal.