0
   

Atheism, Agnosticism, Politics and Religion

 
 
sumac
 
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 05:14 am
Unfortunately, the article and/or topic discussed below will probably not get wide distribution throughout the Bible Belt, or within the right and religious sectors of politics. Pity. It would be interesting to read of the reactions to it.

This appeared as an Op-Ed piece in the NYT of 7/12/03 at: The Bright Stuff
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 9,423 • Replies: 136
No top replies

 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 05:37 am
Sumac- The web site for this movement is:

http://www.the-brights.net/

I don't particularly care for the word "bright" (I think that it has loaded connotations), but I think that the idea itself has a lot of merit. People with a naturalistic world view do NOT have a forum in the politiical marketplace. I think that it is laudable that people are attempting to pull people of similar thought together, especially during this time of politically spurred religiosity.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 05:52 am
Couldn't agree with your points more, Phoenix, and I will check out the website.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 05:59 am
I just joined at the website, and told them of my distaste for the term 'bright'.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 10:08 am
Hi Phoenix, I'm another atheist that detest the use of the word "bright" for anything I believe in. It shouldn't be that difficult to find another name that represents us, but "bright" is out. c.i.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 10:14 am
I'm not a joiner -- and will not join this group. But I wish them well.

In my opinion, the atheists have it much better than the agnostics.

My guess is that agnostics (people who do not know if God exists or is no gods exist) are in the majority -- but we might as well be invisible.

Agnostics, unfortunately, have a tendency to say: "To hell with both your houses" -- and sit out the acrimoneous discussions (!) between atheists and theists.

I am a very activist agnostic.

I ain't sitting on no sidelines -- and anyone using that "fence straddler" nonsense with me gets more than their money's worth before I'm through.

Like I said: Good luck to them.

I do agree that "the brights" opens them up to unnecessary laughter.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 01:59 pm
I don't know, frank -- your avatar certainly looks bright.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 03:05 pm
I just checked out the website and though I subscribe largely to the concept, I didn't sign in.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 05:58 pm
back later
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 07:11 pm
truth
The label, Brights, sounds a bit like the pretentious attitude of Mensa. I wonder if they include naturalists like zen buddhists and taoists who have nothing to do with miracles, supernaturalism, gods, and "mystical" entities.
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 10:00 pm
Well, at least they now realize that marketing their ideas under the term secular humanism is getting them nowhere.

Yet they are not dealing with the fundamental issues:

How is one's life affected by embracing their positions?

What kind of world do they envision if their views are dominant in a culture?

(Wo)man is more than the sum of her/his parts, and the evidence of the material world does not predict the gestalt of sentience, especially by their "scientific, none-supernatural" examination simple matter, less sophisticated life forms, or even the human brain.

For sentience to occur, 2 plus 2 equals 5. This is not logical, but if you are capable of reading this, you lend a proof this equation.

How do they deal with the illogic that their premise holds, that the human mind arises from nothingness?

On a political level in the West, attacks on secular humanism arise from antagonism to the heterodoxy of questioning the Judeo-Christian world-view and the morality and ethics that flow from this world-view.

Once the artifices of this world-view are undermined, what is left?

It's one thing for a 7 year old to find there is no Santa Claus; entirely another matter for human civilization to find there is no God.

"Oh that a man's reach should exceed his grasp, or what's a Heaven for?"
...Robert Browning...
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Jul, 2003 06:11 am
Lightwizard wrote:
I don't know, frank -- your avatar certainly looks bright.


It was taken on a "bright" beach. Sure has a lot of relected sunlight, doesn't it!!!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Jul, 2003 06:13 am
I joined the cub scouts, and got thrown out for jumping up and down on the den mother's sofa.

I joined the Army, no further explanation is necessary for that . . .

I have eschewed joining ever since. Goofballs such as these convince me of the wisdom of that position.
0 Replies
 
Dux
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Jul, 2003 06:30 am
I also join, but I don't know why it would cause a laugh the term bright(I don't understand many funny things in english), would someone plz care to elaborate? Confused
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Jul, 2003 06:32 am
Dux- The term "bright" is used as a synonym for "intelligent".
0 Replies
 
Dux
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Jul, 2003 06:34 am
I do know that, but still don't get why it would cause a laugh?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Jul, 2003 06:36 am
There is something inherently funny about people tooting their own horn. Using the word "brights" to describe themselves amounts to a lot of tooting on one's own horn.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Jul, 2003 06:37 am
When my step Dad used to call me "bright boy" I did not feel very special.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Jul, 2003 06:39 am
Perhaps there was a touch of sarcasm in the usage, EB?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Jul, 2003 06:44 am
edgarblythe wrote:
When my step Dad used to call me "bright boy" I did not feel very special.



My Dad use to compliment me by telling people:

My other two sons I gotta pay to get them to be good. Frank, here is good for nothing.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Atheism, Agnosticism, Politics and Religion
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/07/2025 at 09:22:40