Reply
Sat 31 Mar, 2007 05:11 pm
Artwork that goes for the groin
Quote:Forty years ago, a key Supreme Court case with a Kafka-esque name, United States v. Ten Erotic Paintings, put works of some of the great modern artists of Europe on trial. Seventeen years ago, an exhibit of the photographs of Robert Mapplethorpe in Cincinnati wound up getting a museum curator arrested on obscenity charges. He was later acquitted. Five years ago, U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft failed to see the irony of covering seminude art deco statues in the Justice Department ?- "Spirit of Justice" and "Majesty of Law" ?- with giant blue drapes reminiscent of burkas as American troops were fighting against the Taliban.
Now, though, more and more Americans are voting with their feet and their dollars to say they appreciate a painting that may at first look like fresh cherries but when you stare long enough, becomes an image of kinky sex.
Just such a painting was part of this month's Seattle Erotic Art Festival, considered the top such festival in the country, and one of a growing list of erotic art fairs, festivals, galleries and exhibitions spreading throughout the United States and abroad.
...
I'm not sure how to respond to this thread because I don't want to get banned!
There is some "erotic" art that I like very much but the last time I posted my favorite Paul Outerbridge photo it got pulled. I like some Maplethorpe and I love Mark's photos of the prostitutes in Bombay and I like a lot of the pin-up era Bettie Page type stuff.
Soooo.....
Boomer--
Why not post a link to the photo rather than to the painting itself?
The show is rather tame if you ask me and might have been overlooked by any authorities even in the 60's. It was in the 50's that Kienholz "Back Seat Dodge" got some flack in an L.A. exhibition. It wasn't that long before things started to lighten up and the Supreme Court finally put some kind of loosely written interpretation of what was allowed and what was not allowed -- have to search for the year.
http://www.artchive.com/artchive/K/kienholz/back_seat_dodge.jpg.html
I went to a gallery the other day in Bethnal Green, (London) and all it was was cumming willies.
There was tintin cumming, and superman, and the hulk.
I wonder what Cary Kwok's parents thought when they came and looked at the preview.
There's a not-so-fine line between "erotic," "vulgar," and "wtf?"