sozobe wrote:Hmm. It's stupid for an alcoholic to start drinking again. It's precisely the fact that he's an adult that makes me think he shouldn't be protected. It's stupid -- why not say so?
If he's doing fine, it's stupid but he's gotten away with it... for now. If he's not doing fine, it's just plain stupid.
An alcoholic cannot help him or her self. The booze once introduced into the bloodstream has an effect upon the alcoholic which it does not have upon the non-alcoholic. Ask an alcoholic about their reaction to seeing a person only take a few sips of wine and leave the rest...the alcoholic will cite the waste and a number of other reasons why the wine should be consumed. The non-alcoholic will stare with a confused look and have no idea why it would matter if half a glass of wine is left untouched. It's not stupidity as such.
The A.M.A. refers to alcoholism as a disease and cites the following reasons:
Alcoholism, also known as "alcohol dependence," is a disease that includes four symptoms:
Craving: A strong need, or compulsion, to drink.
Loss of control: The inability to limit one's drinking on any given occasion.
Physical dependence: Withdrawal symptoms, such as nausea, sweating, shakiness, and anxiety, occur when alcohol use is stopped after a period of heavy drinking.
Tolerance: The need to drink greater amounts of alcohol in order to "get high."
If it were merely stupidity, alcoholism would cease existing.