Homosexuality v. Christianity -- A FEW QUESTIONS:

How did cats get into all this?

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=336688#336688

Oh lord! I have killed KITTENS???!!! Oh lord! That is some photo - thankee Craven.

They're not homosexual kittens, are they?

All I can say is Cat-holics beware!

maliagar has finally resorted to name calling. He is human after all. c.i.

Maligar seems to speak at lengths without actually saying anything. Visions of the back of the Dr. Bronner soap botte come to mind.

hey i love the doc bronner labels, kept me intertainted for hours, papered an entire bathroom with them.

PS, We've known about maliagar's inability to say anything, but his ability to use the English language at that task is surprisingly unique. c.i.

There's no point in pursuing the King Kong example if you contend that God is infallible. If that is the case, then there is no parallel. So first you need to establish, by answering my question, whether there is any basis for a comparison, and then I'll take up the King Kong example again.

On the other hand, if you're simply unable or unwilling to answer my question, you should make that clear.

chicagojoe, maliagar "never" admits anything of substance, but he is playful with words. c.i.

"...maybe all those repressed Catholics had better stop playing with themselves...."

Cephus: I'm surprised to note that you're wrong this time (you're always right!) We normal people "play with" ourselves, whether we're assassinating kittens or whatever. Catholics do not play. They take it very, very seriously. And it makes it SO much harder... more difficult I mean. EVERYONE is watching. God, the saints, and worst of all Mother Mary. As you might imagine, pleasure is hard to come by for a Catholic.

Sophomoric, rhetorical and didactic meandering by a practicing sophist cannot be disguised as any kind of erudite examination of a subject. Whoever qualifies on this forum need not step forward, it is obvious who they are. And I think that just about covers it.

i bad, i not do it agin ( i had a didactic meandering once but i got lost in the allusion fields)

You haven't a didactic bone in your body and although you may meander sometimes, it's usually in good fun.

Actually, he admitted that God "took a risk" in placing the tree of the knowledge of good and evil in the middle of Eden. That was a startling admission, one that has serious implications for Maliagar's position. It is no wonder, then, that, upon belatedly recognizing the seriousness of this admission, Maliagar has been furiously backtracking. And now he is in such a logical corner that he has decided the only way to save himself is to refuse to answer one very simple question: "can God ever make a mistake?" Really, what kind of devout Christian would hesitate to provide an answer to that question?

Most christians, except maliagar, a devout catholic.

Ah yes, ad hominem attacks. The last bastion of the lost argument.

We're glad to know you're giving up.

Cephus, maliagar can't lose something never won.

Actually, he was never in the 'running.'