27
   

Is there proof God exists?

 
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 09:21 am
particularly liked these two

# ARGUMENT FROM BLINDNESS (I)
(1) Atheists are spiritually blind.
(2) Therefore, God exists.

# ARGUMENT FROM BLINDNESS (II)
(1) God is love.
(2) Love is blind.
(3) Stevie Wonder is blind.
(4) Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.
(5) Therefore, God exists.
0 Replies
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 09:25 am
xingu wrote:
The point is if your an engineer and your going to design something your going to use logic, reason that is backed up by math and past structural designs that work.

Why would you not use the same for religion? Why believe in something that is so totally false that no amount of reasoning, logic or science can support it?

That's not a strawman but a simple question?


You're assuming that my friend must utilize EITHER logic (reason) or faith (emotion) when designing a bridge and/or when considering his relationship w/God. Why would you make that assertion?
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 09:37 am
xingu wrote:

You ducking and dodging again. You can't answer the question so your trying to discredit the question.



I don't have to discredit the question.

It is discredited by the very assumptions that you are using.

Science cannot prove historical events.

Squall like a mashed cat if you must, but that's the way it is.

You cannot prove scientifically what day you washed your socks last week.

Science gets a bad name because folks like you who don't understand it's limits try to apply it to everything.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 09:43 am
Let's go back a bit. We were talking about Genesis, remember?

xingu wrote:
baddog1 wrote:
xingu wrote:
What I would like to know is what his fellow engineers would say to the statement that the sun, moon and stars were created after the earth, plants and trees (Genesis 1:1-19)?

What would his engineer friends say if you told them the sun stood still in the sky for 24 hours? (Joshua 10:13)


It would be unfair for me to speak for my friends on these passages because to the best of my knowledge, we have not spoken of them.

However, given the Christian engineers that I know - I imagine they would go directly to faith.


Faith over reason?

Is that the way to design a bridge?


What does this have to do with your relationship with some God?

I go back to the question Real can't answer; were is the evidence to support the Genesis story I'm speaking of? Where is the evidence to support the Joshua story? You say your fellow engineers will rely on faith. Faith on the story being real even if it defies all science, logic and reason?

Which brings me to my question; why would this type of believer use logic and reason in their everyday life but abandond it when it comes to religion?

Are believers afraid their God will punish them if they don't believe it?

Do they think they will get a better reward if they do believe it?

If you or Real can't answer for them, and I'm sure you two must have discussed this with your fellow believers, then answer for yourselves.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 09:50 am
Real Life wrote:
Science cannot prove historical events.


Again your using twisted logic to duck and weave.

In this case science can. Washing my socks has nothing to do with the creation of the universe. It's a pity you don't understand the difference. There is a massive amount of science out there to show the Biblical accout if totally false. If you claim you know nothing of this information than your displaying your ignorance.

Now show us some evidence to support the Bible story I mentioned in Genesis and stop this nonsence about washing socks.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 09:59 am
xingu wrote:
Let's go back a bit. We were talking about Genesis, remember?.................


...........I go back to the question Real can't answer; were is the evidence to support the Genesis story I'm speaking of?


I see you're modifying your question.

Are you no longer specifying 'scientific proof' ?

Have you realized the foolishness of your previous position?
0 Replies
 
Hamal
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 09:59 am
I am also curious how one thinks that god and science are one in the same the same. This is a serious curiosity and I am not trying to be insulting. I was always under the impression that science does not even have an opinion on "god". Science does its best to explain things with what we have to work with.

The idea of a god to me means taking the leap of faith even though there is no explanation.

To me they are very different lines of thought. That is not to say I have never heard of a scientist believing in god(s) or being religious. I just thought they generally kept it separate and personal.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:00 am
xingu wrote:
There is a massive amount of science out there to show the Biblical accout if totally false.


Such as?
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:02 am
real life wrote:
xingu wrote:
Let's go back a bit. We were talking about Genesis, remember?.................


...........I go back to the question Real can't answer; were is the evidence to support the Genesis story I'm speaking of?


I see you're modifying your question.

Are you no longer specifying 'scientific proof' ?

Have you realized the foolishness of your previous position?


OH, excuse me!

Give me evidence, scienticif proof, anything reasonable.

OK?

Your pretty desperate if you have to resort to this type of tactic.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:03 am
real life wrote:
xingu wrote:
There is a massive amount of science out there to show the Biblical accout if totally false.


Such as?


Like I said, your showing your ignorance.

Do your own homework.
0 Replies
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:08 am
xingu wrote:
Let's go back a bit. We were talking about Genesis, remember?


I already answered the related question.

xingu wrote:
Which brings me to my question; why would this type of believer use logic and reason in their everyday life but abandond it when it comes to religion?


You're presenting a question with an absurd assumption!

xingu wrote:
Are believers afraid their God will punish them if they don't believe it?


If God punishes me - I'm sure I deserved it.

xingu wrote:
Do they think they will get a better reward if they do believe it?


What reward?
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:10 am
xingu wrote:
real life wrote:
xingu wrote:
Let's go back a bit. We were talking about Genesis, remember?.................


...........I go back to the question Real can't answer; were is the evidence to support the Genesis story I'm speaking of?


I see you're modifying your question.

Are you no longer specifying 'scientific proof' ?

Have you realized the foolishness of your previous position?


OH, excuse me!

Give me evidence, scienticif proof, anything reasonable.

OK?

Your pretty desperate if you have to resort to this type of tactic.


Not at all.

There is a huge difference between requiring a scientific standard and other types of proof.

Our legal system, for instance, does not require scientific proof to convict of a crime.

If you don't understand (or more likely, just won't acknowledge) this, then you give science a bad name by misapplying it.

Invoking science at every turn is foolish and pretentious. You want to sound intelligent. 'Give me the science'.

Give me a break. Laughing
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:12 am
xingu wrote:
real life wrote:
xingu wrote:
There is a massive amount of science out there to show the Biblical accout if totally false.


Such as?


Like I said, your showing your ignorance.

Do your own homework.


You made the claim.

Apparently you can't back it up.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:13 am
baddog1 wrote:
xingu wrote:
Let's go back a bit. We were talking about Genesis, remember?


I already answered the related question.

No you didn't. I asked for evidence and all you do is dodge and weave. You obviously can't support your Biblical beliefs.
xingu wrote:
Which brings me to my question; why would this type of believer use logic and reason in their everyday life but abandond it when it comes to religion?


You're presenting a question with an absurd assumption!

I'm asking a simpe question your can't answer; which is why I got the above response.

xingu wrote:
Are believers afraid their God will punish them if they don't believe it?


If God punishes me - I'm sure I deserved it.

xingu wrote:
Do they think they will get a better reward if they do believe it?


What reward?

More ignorance


Your a waste of time.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:15 am
Real Life wrote:
Invoking science at every turn is foolish and pretentious. You want to sound intelligent. 'Give me the science'.


I'd expect that from someone who holds religious nonsence over science.
0 Replies
 
Hamal
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:15 am
Wow you guys are fast. Going back to read a bit here... but on a light note this made me laugh out loud haha:

# ARGUMENT FROM BLINDNESS (II)
(1) God is love.
(2) Love is blind.
(3) Stevie Wonder is blind.
(4) Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.
(5) Therefore, God exists.
0 Replies
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:20 am
Hamal wrote:
I am also curious how one thinks that god and science are one in the same the same.


Hi hamal:

Another member pieced this absurd assertion together while ignoring a direct question.

You can read for yourself here: http://www.able2know.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=92687&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=240
0 Replies
 
Hamal
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:23 am
ahh, gotcha, going back to read there. Thanks, Baddog.
0 Replies
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:24 am
xingu wrote:
Real Life wrote:
Invoking science at every turn is foolish and pretentious. You want to sound intelligent. 'Give me the science'.


I'd expect that from someone who holds religious nonsence over science.



xingu: I started a separate thread (so as not to further derail this one) related to your (and others) assertions and invite you to participate.

http://www.able2know.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=104770
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Oct, 2007 10:27 am
xingu wrote:
Real Life wrote:
Invoking science at every turn is foolish and pretentious. You want to sound intelligent. 'Give me the science'.


I'd expect that from someone who holds religious nonsence over science.


Can you scientifically prove where you were last Tuesday?

Can you scientifically prove what you ate for dinner on Sunday?

Can you scientifically prove that your grandmother wore earrings?

You want to invoke science for everything, but you do not understand it's limits, xingu.

To you, science is god. It is omniscient and can answer all.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 6.51 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 07:31:34