Ticomaya wrote:McTag wrote:Does anyone else feel disquiet, having concluded that our invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan was immoral and illegal as well as ill-advised and badly conducted, about the way the media are fawning all over the stupid prince?
No, McT ... only you.
Wrong as usual, Tico.
Catherine Bennett expressed it well in The Observer today:
"After all, a fortnight ago, if someone had told you that Harry, recently a world-class piss artist in a Nazi costume, unable to string more than three words together, was about to be reinvented as 'the soldier prince', a national hero endowed with the moral authority to 'show us the way', it might have sounded no less baloney than .......to reduce the nation to a condition of drooling complicity.
Something, anyway, must explain how on Thursday Harry hysteria spread within hours, from places where you expect to find headlines such as 'My War' (the Mirror) and 'One of Our Boys' (the Sun), to more royal-averse offices where layers of cynicism offered no resistance to the epidemic of simpering and fawning, twinkling and swooning.
But the grovelling has been nowhere as intense, nor as sustained as at the BBC, where royal correspondents and their editors have been determined to place their work on a scrupulously loyal, wartime footing, replacing the news for two consecutive days with illustrated accounts of the prince's adventures, delivered in a whispery, state funeral sing-song, with additional commentary from brigadiers and generals, describing the 'soldier prince' as exemplary, dedicated, distinguished, etc, etc."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/mar/02/military.monarchy